Paper · 2024 · Vestnik of the Russian agricultural science

Productivity and quality indicators of znatny barley when using mineral fertilizers and biological products

V. A. Svirina; V. G. Chernogaev

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Data from two years of research on the effect of microbiological fertilizers and a growth regulator on the production process of Znatny barley are presented. During the research the technologies elements for cultivating spring barley of the Znatny variety were studied using microbiological preparations Organit N, Zh, Organit P, Zh, silicon-containing growth regulator ApaSil, P, bacterial preparation Nitragin KM, SP, and varietal characteristics of the growth and development of the crop were identified. The positive effect of biological products on the yield and quality indicators of barley has been shown. According to the cultivating productivity of Znatny barley variety the variant No. 4 stood out: – N60P60K60 (background) + Vial Trio, VSK – 1.2 l/t + Tabu, VSK – 1 l/t + Organit N, F – 2 l/t + Organit P, F – 2 l/t + ApaSil, P – 0.05 kg/t – seed treatment + Organit N, F – 1 l/ha + Organit P, F – 1 l/ha + ApaSil, P – 0.05 kg/ha – foliar feeding of plants. Analysis of the yield structure showed that the number of productive stems before harvesting was 558 pcs/m2; in option No. 4 with microbiological preparations, this figure was 730 pcs/m2. Also, when using biological products there is a positive tendency to increase the length of the ear by 0.5–1.2 cm, the weight of grain per ear – by 0.08–0.16 g compared to the control. The number of grains in an ear in the control was 21.7 pieces, in option No. 4 – by 1.9 pieces. more compared to the control. In option No. 4, the weight of 1000 grains exceed the control by 1.4 g. The results obtained over two years convincingly show an increase in grain yield over the control by 0.5–1.12 t/ha or by 8.5–19.0%. The use of microbiological fertilizers increases the yield of barley in option No. 4 from 5.9 t/ha in control to a maximum value of 7.02 t/ha, or by 19% against the background of the initial use of mineral fertilizers. Net income was to 3,448 rubles/ha, conditionally.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological products had a positive effect on the yield and quality indicators of barley.

Treatment
biological productse0
Outcome
yield and quality indicatorse0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The positive effect of biological products on the yield and quality indicators of barley has been shown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variant No. 4 stood out for cultivating productivity of the Znatny barley variety.

Taxon
Znatny barleye0
Treatment
variant No. 4e0
Outcome
cultivating productivitye0
Direction
stood oute0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“According to the cultivating productivity of Znatny barley variety the variant No. 4 stood out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of productive stems before harvesting was 730 pcs/m2 in option No. 4 with microbiological preparations, versus 558 pcs/m2 before.

Treatment
option No. 4 with microbiological preparationse0
Outcome
number of productive stemse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
730 pcs/m2e0
Qualifier
558 pcs/m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of productive stems before harvesting was 558 pcs/m2; in option No. 4 with microbiological preparations, this figure was 730 pcs/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“znatny barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With biological products, ear length tended to increase by 0.5–1.2 cm.

Treatment
biological productse0
Outcome
length of the eare0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.5–1.2 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when using biological products there is a positive tendency to increase the length of the ear by 0.5–1.2 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“znatny barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With biological products, grain weight per ear increased by 0.08–0.16 g compared with the control.

Treatment
biological productse0
Outcome
weight of grain per eare0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.08–0.16 ge0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when using biological products there is a positive tendency to increase the length of the ear by 0.5–1.2 cm, the weight of grain per ear – by 0.08–0.16 g compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“znatny barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of grains per ear in option No. 4 was 1.9 more than the control, which had 21.7.

Treatment
option No. 4e0
Outcome
number of grains in an eare0
Direction
moree0
Value
1.9 piecese0
Qualifier
21.7 piecese0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of grains in an ear in the control was 21.7 pieces, in option No. 4 – by 1.9 pieces. more compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“znatny barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In option No. 4 the weight of 1000 grains exceeded the control by 1.4 g.

Treatment
option No. 4e0
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse0
Direction
exceede0
Value
1.4 ge0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In option No. 4, the weight of 1000 grains exceed the control by 1.4 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1538 · show in text ↑
t0

“znatny barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased over the control by 0.5–1.12 t/ha, or 8.5–19.0%, over two years.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.5–1.12 t/ha or by 8.5–19.0%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in grain yield over the control by 0.5–1.12 t/ha or by 8.5–19.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“znatny barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbiological fertilizers raised barley yield in option No. 4 from 5.9 t/ha in the control to a maximum of 7.02 t/ha, or by 19%, on a background of mineral fertilizers.

Treatment
microbiological fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
7.02 t/ha, or by 19%e0
Qualifier
5.9 t/ha in controle0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of microbiological fertilizers increases the yield of barley in option No. 4 from 5.9 t/ha in control to a maximum value of 7.02 t/ha, or by 19%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1824 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net income was 3,448 rubles/ha, conditionally.

Outcome
Net incomee0
Value
3,448 rubles/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net income was to 3,448 rubles/ha, conditionally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1891–1939 · show in text ↑
t0

“znatny barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.