Paper · 2024 · The Agrarian Scientific Journal

The influence of black fallow preparation methods on agrophysical properties, soil mois-ture and yield of winter wheat in the Lower Volga region

Anatoly Petrovich Solodovnikov; Vladimir Nikolaevich Maksimchuk

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The article provides two years of data on the influence of black fallow preparation methods on agrophysical properties and moisture of the soil. In spring, a non-moldboard system for the preparation of black fallow during its development soil density increases by 5.9% and water permeability reduces by 22%, in fall, during the sowing of winter wheat, it increases by 2.8 % and reduces by 24%, respectively. The use of the herbicide in black fallow with a decrease in the number of cultivations increases the density by 0.02 g/cm3 and reduces water permeability by 5.3 mm/h. In fall, during the sowing of winter wheat, the best moisture retention was after classical plowing, which exceeded the non-moldboard cultivation by 0.57% of the soil mass. Integrated weed control measures additionally retained 0.25% (35 m3/ha) of moisture compared to agricultural practices. Integrated measures to control weeds in black fallow increase the yield of winter wheat by 0.06 t/ha for non-moldboard cultivation and by 0.11 t/ha for moldboard cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-moldboard fallow preparation increased spring soil density by 5.9%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
non-moldboard systeme0
Outcome
soil densitye0
Direction
increasese0
Value
5.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spring, a non-moldboard system for the preparation of black fallow during its development soil density increases by 5.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-moldboard fallow preparation reduced spring water permeability by 22%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
non-moldboard system for the preparation of black fallowe1
Outcome
water permeabilitye0
Direction
reducese0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water permeability reduces by 22%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–306 · show in text ↑
e1

“non-moldboard system for the preparation of black fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–214 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At autumn sowing, non-moldboard preparation increased soil density by 2.8 %.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
non-moldboard system for the preparation of black fallowe2
Outcome
soil densitye1
Direction
increasese0
Value
2.8 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in fall, during the sowing of winter wheat, it increases by 2.8 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–373 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil density increases by 5.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–268 · show in text ↑
e2

“non-moldboard system for the preparation of black fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At autumn sowing, non-moldboard preparation reduced soil permeability by 24%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
non-moldboard system for the preparation of black fallowe2
Outcome
water permeabilitye1
Direction
reducese0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduces by 24%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–406 · show in text ↑
e1

“water permeability reduces by 22%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“non-moldboard system for the preparation of black fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–214 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide use with fewer cultivations increased fallow soil density by 0.02 g/cm3.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
use of the herbicide in black fallow with a decrease in the number of cultivationse0
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
increasese0
Value
0.02 g/cm3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the herbicide in black fallow with a decrease in the number of cultivations increases the density by 0.02 g/cm3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide use with fewer cultivations reduced water permeability by 5.3 mm/h.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
use of the herbicide in black fallow with a decrease in the number of cultivationse1
Outcome
water permeabilitye0
Direction
reducese0
Value
5.3 mm/he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduces water permeability by 5.3 mm/h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–573 · show in text ↑
e1

“use of the herbicide in black fallow with a decrease in the number of cultivations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Classical plowing retained 0.57% more soil moisture than non-moldboard cultivation at autumn wheat sowing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
classical plowinge0
Outcome
moisture retentione0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
0.57% of the soil masse0
Comparator
non-moldboard cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best moisture retention was after classical plowing, which exceeded the non-moldboard cultivation by 0.57% of the soil mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated weed control retained 0.25% more moisture than agricultural practices.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Integrated weed control measurese0
Outcome
moisturee0
Direction
additionally retainede0
Value
0.25% (35 m3/ha)e0
Comparator
agricultural practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integrated weed control measures additionally retained 0.25% (35 m3/ha) of moisture compared to agricultural practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated weed control increased wheat yield by 0.06 t/ha with non-moldboard cultivation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Integrated measures to control weeds in black fallowe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
yield of winter wheate0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.06 t/hae0
Qualifier
non-moldboard cultivatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integrated measures to control weeds in black fallow increase the yield of winter wheat by 0.06 t/ha for non-moldboard cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated weed control increased wheat yield by 0.11 t/ha with moldboard cultivation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Integrated measures to control weeds in black fallowe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
yield of winter wheate0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.11 t/hae0
Qualifier
moldboard cultivatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integrated measures to control weeds in black fallow increase the yield of winter wheat by 0.06 t/ha for non-moldboard cultivation and by 0.11 t/ha for moldboard cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1041 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 118 positive, 24 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

herbicide · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.