Paper · 2024 · Agricultural Systems

Nitrogen fertilizer use and climate interactions: Implications for maize yields in Kansas

Na Huang; Xiaomao Lin; Fei Lun; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

While climate change threatens maize growth and production, appropriate N fertilizer use (N) can help mitigate this threat and stabilize or improve maize yields. Accurate application of N fertilizer is of increasing interest as an adaptation measure for climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing economic returns. The objectives of this study are to: 1) clarify how maize yields respond to N fertilizer use under changes in temperature and precipitation, and 2) explore the effects of various climate conditions on N fertilizer use efficiency. We used a long-term and county-level maize N fertilizer use and climate dataset from 1981 to 2019 in Kansas to determine the impact of N fertilizer use on maize yield. We developed a panel data model with fixed effects, incorporating explanatory variables, including the interaction of growing-degree-days (GDD) with N fertilizer use (GDDit*Nit), extreme-degree-days (EDD) with N fertilizer use (EDDit*Nit), and precipitation (Precip) with N fertilizer use (Precipit*Nit), along with a non-linear N-fertilizer use term. Then, the adaptive effects of N fertilizer use on climatic risks for maize were examined and the county-level results were aggregated into the nine crop reporting districts, as defined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service. Our results show that: 1) an increase in N fertilizer use magnified the negative effects of higher EDD on maize yield but enhanced the positive effects of higher GDD and precipitation on maize yield, impacts which were increasingly evident moving from western to eastern regions across Kansas; 2) hotter environments reduced maize yield by 7% in the west; conversely, warmer and wetter environmental conditions contributed to 2.4% yield gains in the southeast; changes in N fertilizer use impacted maize yield to a lesser extent than climate changes; and 3) under the averaged climate conditions, the optimal N fertilizer rate increased from northwestern (average 50 kg N ha−1) to eastern (average 158 kg N ha−1) regions in Kansas. Our results reveal the interaction between climate and N fertilization on maize yield and clarify how the efficiency of N fertilizer use is affected by various climatic conditions. Our findings highlight the quantifiable interactions between climate and N fertilizer use when evaluating dynamic N fertilizer applications and climate change adaptations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More N fertilizer magnified the negative effect of higher EDD on maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N fertilizer usee0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
negativee0
Qualifier
higher EDDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in N fertilizer use magnified the negative effects of higher EDD on maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1473 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More N fertilizer enhanced the positive effect of higher GDD on maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N fertilizer usee0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
higher GDDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in N fertilizer use magnified the negative effects of higher EDD on maize yield but enhanced the positive effects of higher GDD and precipitation on maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More N fertilizer enhanced the positive effect of precipitation on maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N fertilizer usee0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
precipitatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in N fertilizer use magnified the negative effects of higher EDD on maize yield but enhanced the positive effects of higher GDD and precipitation on maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Climate–fertilizer interaction effects strengthened eastward across Kansas.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
impactse0
Direction
increasinglye0
Qualifier
western to eastern regionse0
Setting
Kansase0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impacts which were increasingly evident moving from western to eastern regions across Kansas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hotter environments reduced western Kansas maize yield by 7%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
hotter environmentse0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7%e0
Setting
weste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hotter environments reduced maize yield by 7% in the west”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1710 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warmer and wetter conditions increased southeast maize yield by 2.4%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
warmer and wetter environmental conditionse0
Outcome
yield gainse0
Direction
gainse0
Value
2.4%e0
Setting
southeaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“warmer and wetter environmental conditions contributed to 2.4% yield gains in the southeast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1815 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer changes affected yield less than climate changes.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
changes in N fertilizer usee0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
lessere0
Comparator
climate changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changes in N fertilizer use impacted maize yield to a lesser extent than climate changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–1905 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal N rate under average climate was 50 kg N ha−1 in northwestern Kansas.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
optimal N fertilizer ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50 kg N ha−1e0
Qualifier
averaged climate conditionse0
Setting
northwesterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the averaged climate conditions, the optimal N fertilizer rate increased from northwestern (average 50 kg N ha−1) to eastern (average 158 kg N ha−1) regions in Kansas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2086 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal N rate under average climate was 158 kg N ha−1 in eastern Kansas.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
optimal N fertilizer ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
158 kg N ha−1e0
Qualifier
averaged climate conditionse0
Setting
easterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the averaged climate conditions, the optimal N fertilizer rate increased from northwestern (average 50 kg N ha−1) to eastern (average 158 kg N ha−1) regions in Kansas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2086 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑