Paper · 2024 · Archives of Current Research International

Evaluation of Exotic Sesame Germplasm for their Resistance Against (Antigastra catalaunalis) Duponchel

N. Swetha; T. Boopathi; C. Narendra Reddy; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate 132 USDA germplasm for their resistance against sesame leaf webber A. catalaunalis. Study Design: Randomized Block Design (RBD). Methodology: Leaf webber incidence was recorded weekly in two seasons (2023, 2024) and the percent leaf damage was calculated. The data was subjected to statistical analysis. The germplasm were categorized based on the percent leaf damage in both seasons using a 1-9 scoring methodology. The combined mean analysis was also carried out, to obtain unbiased results. the germplasm were also categorized based on the combined analysis. Results: In season 1, leaf damage by sesame leaf webber ranged from 0% to 97.96%, with PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 being pest-free, while PI 170726 had the highest damage (97.96%). Germplasm were categorized as highly resistant (48), resistant (31), moderately resistant (25), susceptible (13) and highly susceptible (15). In season 2, damage ranged from 0% to 97.30%, with PI 152498, PI 158045, PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 being pest-free and PI 170726 again having the highest damage (97.30%). Germplasm were categorized as highly resistant (35), resistant (36), moderately resistant (33), susceptible (12) and highly susceptible (16). Based on combined mean value analysis, The germplasm were categorized as highly resistant (28), resistant (54), moderately resistant (21), susceptible (11), and highly susceptible (18). Conclusion: The germplasm PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 were completely free from pest damage in both seasons and also based on combined mean analysis. Thus these germplasm are highly resistant against sesame leaf webber.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season 1 leaf damage ranged from 0% to 97.96%.

Interactor
sesame leaf webbere0pest
Outcome
leaf damage by sesame leaf webbere0
Value
0% to 97.96%e0
Qualifier
season 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In season 1, leaf damage by sesame leaf webber ranged from 0% to 97.96%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 were pest-free in season 1.

Material
PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170e0
Outcome
pest-freee0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 being pest-free”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PI 170726 had 97.96% damage in season 1.

Material
PI 170726e0
Outcome
highest damagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
97.96%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PI 170726 had the highest damage (97.96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season 1 classifications numbered 48 highly resistant, 31 resistant, and 25 moderately resistant.

Outcome
highly resistant (48), resistant (31), moderately resistant (25)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highly resistant (48), resistant (31), moderately resistant (25)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season 1 classifications included 13 susceptible and 15 highly susceptible accessions.

Outcome
susceptible (13) and highly susceptible (15)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“susceptible (13) and highly susceptible (15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season 2 leaf damage ranged from 0% to 97.30%.

Outcome
damagee0
Value
0% to 97.30%e0
Qualifier
season 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In season 2, damage ranged from 0% to 97.30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five named accessions were pest-free in season 2.

Material
PI 152498, PI 158045, PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170e0
Outcome
pest-freee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PI 152498, PI 158045, PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 being pest-free”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PI 170726 again had highest damage, 97.30%, in season 2.

Material
PI 170726e0
Outcome
highest damagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
97.30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PI 170726 again having the highest damage (97.30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season 2 classifications numbered 35 highly resistant, 36 resistant, and 33 moderately resistant.

Outcome
highly resistant (35), resistant (36), moderately resistant (33)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highly resistant (35), resistant (36), moderately resistant (33)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season 2 included 12 susceptible and 16 highly susceptible accessions.

Outcome
susceptible (12) and highly susceptible (16)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“susceptible (12) and highly susceptible (16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined analysis classified 28 highly resistant, 54 resistant, and 21 moderately resistant accessions.

Outcome
highly resistant (28), resistant (54), moderately resistant (21)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highly resistant (28), resistant (54), moderately resistant (21)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined analysis classified 11 susceptible and 18 highly susceptible accessions.

Outcome
susceptible (11), and highly susceptible (18)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“susceptible (11), and highly susceptible (18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 were damage-free in both seasons and the combined analysis, and designated highly resistant.

Material
PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170e0
Outcome
completely free from pest damagee0
Qualifier
both seasons and also based on combined mean analysise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 were completely free from pest damage in both seasons and also based on combined mean analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑