Paper · 2024 · Ecology and Evolution

Plant resistance and predators influence the density dependence of herbivore survival and distribution of herbivory

Monica Paniagua Montoya; Alexander J. Forde; Brian Inouye; et al.

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant resistance and predators can influence density-dependent survivorship and growth of herbivores, and their damage to plants. Although the independent effects of plant resistance and predators on herbivores and herbivory are well known, little is known about their interactive and density-dependent effects on herbivores and the amount and distribution of damage on plants. These relationships are important for understanding how herbivore and plant populations influence each other. We used a laboratory density-manipulation experiment to determine how plant resistance (three treatments: jasmonate-insensitive, unmanipulated wild type, and jasmonate-sprayed wild-type plants) and predation (two treatments: predator or no predator) affect the survivorship and growth of an herbivore, as well as per capita damage and the distribution of damage on plants. We found evidence that the density dependence of herbivore survivorship was influenced by predators and an interactive effect of plant resistance and predation. Herbivore growth was reduced by higher plant resistance but was not density-dependent nor affected by predation. Per capita plant damage was reduced by plant resistance, predation, and herbivore density. The within-plant distribution of damage became more even with increasing herbivore density but was not affected by predation or the independent effect of plant resistance. The distribution of damage was also affected by an interaction between plant resistance and herbivore density; damage became less aggregated with density across all plant resistance treatments, but the decrease was strongest for the jasmonate-insensitive plants. These results show that predators influence herbivore density dependence, and that plant resistance can affect the impact of predators on herbivores. Though plant resistance, predation, and herbivore density all reduced per capita herbivore damage to plants, only herbivore density and plant resistance affected the distribution of damage. Distributions of herbivory can influence plant success; documenting patterns of herbivory is an under-appreciated avenue for integrating effects of plant resistance, predators, and herbivore density on plant-herbivore interactions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher plant resistance reduced herbivore growth.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
higher plant resistancee1
Interactor
Herbivoree1herbivore
Outcome
Herbivore growthe1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Herbivore growth was reduced by higher plant resistance but was not density-dependent nor affected by predation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predation did not change herbivore growth.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
predatione1
Interactor
Herbivoree1herbivore
Outcome
Herbivore growthe1
Direction
nor affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Herbivore growth was reduced by higher plant resistance but was not density-dependent nor affected by predation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbivore growth was not density-dependent.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
densitye1
Outcome
Herbivore growthe1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Verbatim

e1

“Herbivore growth was reduced by higher plant resistance but was not density-dependent nor affected by predation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predators influenced the density dependence of herbivore survivorship.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
predatorse1
Interactor
herbivoree1herbivore
Second interactor
predatorse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
density dependence of herbivore survivorshipe1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“We found evidence that the density dependence of herbivore survivorship was influenced by predators and an interactive effect of plant resistance and predation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1020 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant resistance and predation interacted in affecting density dependence of herbivore survivorship.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
plant resistance and predatione1
Outcome
density dependence of herbivore survivorshipe1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“We found evidence that the density dependence of herbivore survivorship was influenced by predators and an interactive effect of plant resistance and predation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher plant resistance reduced per capita plant damage.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
plant resistancee1
Interactor
herbivoree1herbivore
Outcome
Per capita plant damagee1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Per capita plant damage was reduced by plant resistance, predation, and herbivore density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predation reduced per capita plant damage.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
predatione1
Interactor
herbivoree1herbivore
Outcome
Per capita plant damagee1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Per capita plant damage was reduced by plant resistance, predation, and herbivore density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbivore density reduced per capita plant damage.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
herbivore densitye1
Interactor
herbivoree1herbivore
Outcome
Per capita plant damagee1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Per capita plant damage was reduced by plant resistance, predation, and herbivore density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing herbivore density made the within-plant distribution of damage more even.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
increasing herbivore densitye1
Interactor
herbivoree1herbivore
Outcome
distribution of damagee1
Direction
more evene1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The within-plant distribution of damage became more even with increasing herbivore density but was not affected by predation or the independent effect of plant resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predation did not affect the within-plant distribution of damage.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
predatione1
Outcome
distribution of damagee1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The within-plant distribution of damage became more even with increasing herbivore density but was not affected by predation or the independent effect of plant resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant resistance did not affect the within-plant distribution of damage independently of herbivore density.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
plant resistancee1
Outcome
distribution of damagee1
Direction
not affectede1
Qualifier
independent effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The within-plant distribution of damage became more even with increasing herbivore density but was not affected by predation or the independent effect of plant resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1396 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damage became less aggregated with herbivore density across all plant resistance treatments.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
herbivore densitye1
Outcome
damagee1
Direction
less aggregatede1
Qualifier
across all plant resistance treatmentse1

Verbatim

e1

“The distribution of damage was also affected by an interaction between plant resistance and herbivore density; damage became less aggregated with density across all plant resistance treatments, but the decrease was strongest for the jasmonate-insensitive plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1659 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in aggregation of damage with density was strongest for jasmonate-insensitive plants.

Taxon
plante1
Material
jasmonate-insensitivee1
Outcome
distribution of damagee1
Direction
decreasee1
Qualifier
strongeste1

Verbatim

e1

“The distribution of damage was also affected by an interaction between plant resistance and herbivore density; damage became less aggregated with density across all plant resistance treatments, but the decrease was strongest for the jasmonate-insensitive plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1659 · show in text ↑