Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Agronomy

Development of Combination Rapid Propagation Techniques for Diverse Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars in an Aeroponic System

Sovannara Moun; Supawadee Kaewrahun; Anon Janket

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cassava serves as a crucial raw material and sustenance staple in developing countries, extensively used in the production of starch, bioethanol, and various bioproducts. However, the cultivation of cassava is increasingly challenged by diseases, particularly the cassava mosaic virus. Therefore, efficient propagule systems are needed to provide disease‐free plants to sustain production. This study aimed to develop a rapid propagation method to increase the production of planting material. Various propagation media were assessed for their impact on root formation and plantlet vigour using a 3 × 4 factorial in a Randomized Complete Block Design during April 2023 to September 2023. Three cassava cultivars (KU50, RY9, and HB60) were tested against four media (distilled water, 250 mg·L −1 IBA, SAH solution, and IBA + SAH combination). Subsequently, the optimal medium was used to compare three propagation techniques (leaf bud, mini, and normal cutting) across the cassava cultivars. Aeroponic systems were then employed for further shoot multiplication, evaluating growth and survival metrics. In the first experiment, RY9 had better growth parameters, while KU50 had the highest survival rate at 82%. Applying the SAH was the optimal solution when compared to other media tested. It significantly enhanced the plantlet height (7.30 cm), survival percentage (71.61%), plantlet vigour index (1513.60), and allometric coefficient (0.55). The leaf bud technique had the highest multiplication trait values, whereas the mini‐cutting method had the highest survival rate, and normal cutting had superior performance compared to leaf bud and mini‐cutting for the plant growth parameters. Plantlets produced through mini‐cutting (93%) and leaf bud propagation (92%) had a higher survival rate than those produced using normal cutting (46%) in the aeroponic system under greenhouse conditions. The study revealed a homogeneity in growth and survival traits across the cassava cultivars evaluated in aeroponic cultivation. These findings demonstrated the potential of using leaf bud or mini‐cutting propagation techniques for multiplication in aeroponic cultivation to produce high‐quality plantlets on a large‐scale production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RY9 had better growth parameters.

Material
RY9e0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RY9 had better growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KU50 had the highest survival rate of 82%.

Material
KU50e0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
82%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KU50 had the highest survival rate at 82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SAH was the optimal medium.

Treatment
SAHe0
Outcome
optimal solutione0
Direction
optimale0
Comparator
other media testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying the SAH was the optimal solution when compared to other media tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SAH enhanced plantlet height to 7.30 cm.

Treatment
SAHe0
Outcome
plantlet heighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
7.30 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying the SAH was the optimal solution when compared to other media tested. It significantly enhanced the plantlet height (7.30 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SAH enhanced survival percentage to 71.61%.

Outcome
survival percentagee0
Value
71.61%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“survival percentage (71.61%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SAH enhanced plantlet vigour index to 1513.60.

Outcome
plantlet vigour indexe0
Value
1513.60e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plantlet vigour index (1513.60)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SAH enhanced allometric coefficient to 0.55.

Outcome
allometric coefficiente0
Value
0.55e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allometric coefficient (0.55)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf bud had the highest multiplication traits.

Treatment
leaf bud techniquee0
Outcome
multiplication trait valuese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf bud technique had the highest multiplication trait values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mini-cutting had the highest survival.

Treatment
mini‐cutting methode0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mini‐cutting method had the highest survival rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal cutting gave superior plant growth parameters.

Treatment
normal cuttinge0
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
leaf bud and mini‐cuttinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“normal cutting had superior performance compared to leaf bud and mini‐cutting for the plant growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mini-cutting plantlets survived at 93%, above normal cutting.

Treatment
mini‐cuttinge0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
93%e0
Comparator
normal cuttinge0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plantlets produced through mini‐cutting (93%) and leaf bud propagation (92%) had a higher survival rate than those produced using normal cutting (46%) in the aeroponic system under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1892 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf bud plantlets survived at 92%, above normal cutting.

Treatment
leaf bud propagatione0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
92%e0
Comparator
normal cuttinge0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plantlets produced through mini‐cutting (93%) and leaf bud propagation (92%) had a higher survival rate than those produced using normal cutting (46%) in the aeroponic system under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1892 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and survival traits were homogeneous across cultivars under aeroponics.

Outcome
growth and survival traitse0
Setting
aeroponic cultivatione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“homogeneity in growth and survival traits across the cassava cultivars evaluated in aeroponic cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1915–2020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended leaf bud or mini-cutting for large scale aeroponic propagation.

Outcome
leaf bud or mini‐cutting propagation techniquese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potential of using leaf bud or mini‐cutting propagation techniques for multiplication in aeroponic cultivation to produce high‐quality plantlets on a large‐scale production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2054–2226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–112 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.