Paper · 2024 · Journal of Scientific Research and Reports

Seasonal Patterns and Abiotic Influences on Fall Armyworm Dynamics in Chhattisgarh's Maize Agroecology

Marella Sai Manoj; Kailash Chander Sharma; R.K. Murali Baskaran

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), an invasive pest in India, exhibits variations in population dynamics and incidence levels compared to its native regions. Understanding these variations is crucial for developing effective management strategies. Given India's diverse agroecosystems and climatic conditions, continuous watch on pest dynamics is essential. In this context a fixed plot experiment for comprehensive analysis of fall armyworm population dynamics, incidence patterns across seasons, and damage potentials in the maize crop ecosystem of the Chhattisgarh plains, India was conducted across three seasons of the year 2022-23. The year-round activity of the pest and its potential to cause huge losses in the early stages of maize was reported. Specifically, the study provided insights into the comparative incidence of fall armyworm in the different maize growing seasons of the area with a maximum incidence in the rainy season (0.58 larvae/plant) followed by winter (0.56 larvae/plant) and summer (0.53 larvae/plant) seasons. Moreover, the incidence trends of fall armyworm in different growing stages of maize were analysed by considering egg laying pattern, leaf damage, larval incidence and plant damage parameters, which highlighted the plant age-dependent response of fall armyworm. The impact of various weather parameters in shaping the damage and population fluctuations was analysed, where the influence of temperature was significant. Results obtained in this study are crucial in devising ETL levels and developing integrated pest management strategies against fall armyworm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall armyworm was active year round and could cause large early maize losses.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
early stagese0
Interactor
Fall ArmywormSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
year-round activity of the peste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The year-round activity of the pest and its potential to cause huge losses in the early stages of maize was reported.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fall Armyworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall armyworm incidence was highest in the rainy season at 0.58 larvae per plant.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Fall ArmywormSpodoptera frugiperdat1pest
Outcome
incidencee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.58 larvae/plante0
Setting
rainy seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum incidence in the rainy season (0.58 larvae/plant) followed by winter (0.56 larvae/plant) and summer (0.53 larvae/plant) seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“Fall Armyworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall armyworm incidence in winter was 0.56 larvae per plant.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Fall ArmywormSpodoptera frugiperdat1pest
Outcome
incidencee0
Value
0.56 larvae/plante0
Setting
wintere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum incidence in the rainy season (0.58 larvae/plant) followed by winter (0.56 larvae/plant) and summer (0.53 larvae/plant) seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“Fall Armyworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall armyworm incidence in summer was 0.53 larvae per plant.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Fall ArmywormSpodoptera frugiperdat1pest
Outcome
incidencee0
Value
0.53 larvae/plante0
Setting
summere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum incidence in the rainy season (0.58 larvae/plant) followed by winter (0.56 larvae/plant) and summer (0.53 larvae/plant) seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“Fall Armyworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Armyworm egg laying, leaf damage, larval incidence and plant damage varied with maize age.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
plant agee0
Interactor
Fall ArmywormSpodoptera frugiperdat1pest
Outcome
leaf damage, larval incidence and plant damagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“egg laying pattern, leaf damage, larval incidence and plant damage parameters, which highlighted the plant age-dependent response of fall armyworm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“Fall Armyworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature significantly influenced armyworm damage and population fluctuations.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Fall ArmywormSpodoptera frugiperdat1pest
Outcome
damage and population fluctuationse0
Setting
temperaturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The impact of various weather parameters in shaping the damage and population fluctuations was analysed, where the influence of temperature was significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“Fall Armyworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑