Paper · 2024 · Manglar

Reservas de carbono en tres sistemas silvopastoriles de la Amazonía peruana

María Elena Díaz Pablo; Julio Cesar Alegre Orihuela; Carlos Alfredo Gómez Bravo; et al.

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Silvopastoral systems (SS) combine productivity with climate change mitigation and improve carbon (C) stocks. The objective of the research was to estimate C stocks in three silvopastoral systems of the high jungle. Three silvopastoral systems were selected for the study: Cedrelinga cateniformis (Tornillo), Eucalyptus spp. (Eucalyptus) and Inga edulis (Inga). Soil samples of 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm were collected and analyzed to determine their physical and chemical characteristics. The estimation of C reserves was carried out from biomass with allometric equations. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive analysis (means and standard deviation) and ANOVA and use of the Scott Knott test. Soil properties did not show significant differences between SS, except for P, Al and CEC. Carbon reserves were higher in the screw system and lower in the inga system. In general, C reserves in the SS were greater in the soil and represented the main C reserve, surpassing the vegetation. The results highlight the importance of soil as a carbon sink and its role in mitigating climate change.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil properties generally did not differ significantly among systems.

Outcome
Soil propertiese0
Direction
did not show significant differencese0
Qualifier
except for P, Al and CECe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil properties did not show significant differences between SS, except for P, Al and CEC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–795 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P differed among systems.

Outcome
Pe0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Soil properties did not show significant differences between SS, except for P, Al and CEC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–795 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Al differed among systems.

Outcome
Ale0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Soil properties did not show significant differences between SS, except for P, Al and CEC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–795 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil CEC differed among systems.

Outcome
CECe0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Soil properties did not show significant differences between SS, except for P, Al and CEC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–795 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon reserves were highest in the Cedrelinga system.

Taxon
Cedrelinga cateniformisCedrelinga cateniformise1
Outcome
Carbon reservese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
inga systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrelinga cateniformis
Cedrelinga cateniformis · TaxonJIRCAS · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbon reserves were higher in the screw system and lower in the inga system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–873 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cedrelinga cateniformis (Tornillo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–307 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon reserves were lower in the Inga system.

Taxon
ingaIngae0
Outcome
Carbon reservese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
screw systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inga
Inga · TaxonO Tupinólogo · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbon reserves were higher in the screw system and lower in the inga system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–873 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil held more carbon than vegetation across these systems.

Outcome
C reservese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
the vegetatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“C reserves in the SS were greater in the soil and represented the main C reserve, surpassing the vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–994 · show in text ↑