Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

French Bean Production as Influenced by Biochar and Biochar Blended Manure Application in Two Agro-Ecological Zones of Rwanda

Solange Uwingabire; Shaban Athuman Omar Chamshama; Jean Nduwamungu; et al.

17
claims
37
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biochar (B) has low nutrient content and is recalcitrant to biodegradation. Supplementing B with a fast-releasing nutrient source may improve soil fertility and physical conditions and increase crop productivity. A three-season field study was conducted on sandy loam and sandy clay loam textured soils to investigate the effect of B mixed with livestock manure (LM) on soil properties (pH, organic carbon (OC), cation exchange capacity (CEC), total Nitrogen (TN), available Phosphorus (Avail P)), and French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda. The study used a factorial randomized block design with four replications. Treatments comprised three levels of B (0, 1, and 3 t/ha) and three levels of LM (0, 1, and 3 t/ha). Biochar was used from S. sesban, G. sepium, A. angustissima, Eucalyptus, and Grevillea sp., prepared using a drum kiln, while LM was prepared using the pit method. The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Tukey (HSD) function at p < 0.05, and linear mixed-effects model were performed in R software version 4.3.3 (R Core Team, 2024). The analysis showed that the treated plots significantly increased French bean yield compared to the control plots, with the highest value found in plots treated with 3 t/ha. The combined plots showed an increased yield compared to sole Biochar or manure. The seasonal increase has been observed, with percentage increases recorded as follows: 16%, 33.56%, 173.06% in sole B plots; 40.28%, 14.43%, and 11.76% in sole LM plots and 125%, 156%, and 209.8% in B + LM plots for season 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Furthermore, the results indicated that the application of B alone or combined with LM significantly enhanced soil pH, OC, TN, avail P, and CEC with the pH ranging from 6.77 to 5.43 for B alone, 6.7–5.35 for LM alone, 8.53–6.06 for B-LM plots, and 4.34–3.78 for control plots. Applying Biochar, either alone or in combination with LM, at a low rate demonstrated positive effects on French bean yield and soil nutrients in smallholder farmers. This study encourages using natural materials such as B and LM to improve soil fertility and increase vegetable production while reducing chemical fertilizers that can cause pollution and damage the environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated plots significantly increased French bean yield compared with control plots, highest with 3 t/ha.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
treated plotse1
Outcome
French bean yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
highest value found in plots treated with 3 t/hae1
Comparator
control plotse1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“The analysis showed that the treated plots significantly increased French bean yield compared to the control plots, with the highest value found in plots treated with 3 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biochar and manure plots gave higher French bean yield than sole biochar or manure.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
combined plotse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
sole Biochar or manuree1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combined plots showed an increased yield compared to sole Biochar or manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole biochar plots increased French bean yield by 16% in season 1.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
sole Be1
Outcome
percentage increasese1
Direction
increasee1
Value
16%e1
Qualifier
season 1e1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“with percentage increases recorded as follows: 16%, 33.56%, 173.06% in sole B plots; 40.28%, 14.43%, and 11.76% in sole LM plots and 125%, 156%, and 209.8% in B + LM plots for season 1, 2, and 3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole biochar plots increased French bean yield by 33.56% in season 2.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
sole Be1
Outcome
percentage increasese1
Direction
increasee1
Value
33.56%e1
Qualifier
season 1e1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“with percentage increases recorded as follows: 16%, 33.56%, 173.06% in sole B plots; 40.28%, 14.43%, and 11.76% in sole LM plots and 125%, 156%, and 209.8% in B + LM plots for season 1, 2, and 3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole biochar plots increased French bean yield by 173.06% in season 3.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
sole Be1
Outcome
percentage increasese1
Direction
increasee1
Value
173.06%e1
Qualifier
season 1e1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“with percentage increases recorded as follows: 16%, 33.56%, 173.06% in sole B plots; 40.28%, 14.43%, and 11.76% in sole LM plots and 125%, 156%, and 209.8% in B + LM plots for season 1, 2, and 3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole manure plots increased French bean yield by 40.28% in season 1.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
sole LMe1
Outcome
percentage increasese1
Direction
increasee1
Value
40.28%e1
Qualifier
season 1e1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“with percentage increases recorded as follows: 16%, 33.56%, 173.06% in sole B plots; 40.28%, 14.43%, and 11.76% in sole LM plots and 125%, 156%, and 209.8% in B + LM plots for season 1, 2, and 3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole manure plots increased French bean yield by 14.43% in season 2.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
sole LMe1
Outcome
percentage increasese1
Direction
increasee1
Value
14.43%e1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“with percentage increases recorded as follows: 16%, 33.56%, 173.06% in sole B plots; 40.28%, 14.43%, and 11.76% in sole LM plots and 125%, 156%, and 209.8% in B + LM plots for season 1, 2, and 3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole manure plots increased French bean yield by 11.76% in season 3.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
sole LMe1
Outcome
percentage increasese1
Direction
increasee1
Value
11.76%e1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“with percentage increases recorded as follows: 16%, 33.56%, 173.06% in sole B plots; 40.28%, 14.43%, and 11.76% in sole LM plots and 125%, 156%, and 209.8% in B + LM plots for season 1, 2, and 3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar plus manure plots increased French bean yield by 125% in season 1.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
B + LMe1
Outcome
percentage increasese1
Direction
increasee1
Value
125%e1
Qualifier
season 1e1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“with percentage increases recorded as follows: 16%, 33.56%, 173.06% in sole B plots; 40.28%, 14.43%, and 11.76% in sole LM plots and 125%, 156%, and 209.8% in B + LM plots for season 1, 2, and 3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar plus manure plots increased French bean yield by 156% in season 2.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
B + LMe1
Outcome
percentage increasese1
Direction
increasee1
Value
156%e1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“with percentage increases recorded as follows: 16%, 33.56%, 173.06% in sole B plots; 40.28%, 14.43%, and 11.76% in sole LM plots and 125%, 156%, and 209.8% in B + LM plots for season 1, 2, and 3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar plus manure plots increased French bean yield by 209.8% in season 3.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
B + LMe1
Outcome
percentage increasese1
Direction
increasee1
Value
209.8%e1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“with percentage increases recorded as follows: 16%, 33.56%, 173.06% in sole B plots; 40.28%, 14.43%, and 11.76% in sole LM plots and 125%, 156%, and 209.8% in B + LM plots for season 1, 2, and 3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar alone or with manure significantly enhanced soil pH, OC and total N.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
B alone or combined with LMe1
Outcome
soil pH, OC, TNe1
Direction
enhancede1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of B alone or combined with LM significantly enhanced soil pH, OC, TN, avail P, and CEC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar alone or with manure significantly enhanced soil available P and CEC.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
B alone or combined with LMe1
Outcome
avail P, and CECe1
Direction
enhancede1
Setting
Rwandae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of B alone or combined with LM significantly enhanced soil pH, OC, TN, avail P, and CEC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1708 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH ranged from 6.77 to 5.43 under biochar alone.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
B alonee1
Outcome
pHe1
Value
6.77 to 5.43e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pH ranging from 6.77 to 5.43 for B alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1758 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH ranged from 6.7 to 5.35 under manure alone.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
LM alonee2
Outcome
pHe1
Value
6.7–5.35e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of B alone or combined with LM significantly enhanced soil pH, OC, TN, avail P, and CEC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1708 · show in text ↑
e2

“6.7–5.35 for LM alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1781 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH ranged from 8.53 to 6.06 in biochar-manure plots.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
B-LM plotse2
Outcome
pHe1
Value
8.53–6.06e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of B alone or combined with LM significantly enhanced soil pH, OC, TN, avail P, and CEC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1708 · show in text ↑
e2

“8.53–6.06 for B-LM plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1783–1807 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH ranged from 4.34 to 3.78 in control plots.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Outcome
pHe1
Value
4.34–3.78e2
Qualifier
control plotse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“French bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Rwanda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of B alone or combined with LM significantly enhanced soil pH, OC, TN, avail P, and CEC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1708 · show in text ↑
e2

“4.34–3.78 for control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1840 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.