Abstract
Abstract The success of Variable Rate Application (VRA) techniques is closely linked to the algorithm used to calculate the different fertilizer rates. In this study, we proposed an algorithm based on the integration between some estimated agronomic inputs and crop radiometric data acquired by using a multispectral sensor. Generally, VRA algorithms are evaluated by comparing the yields, but they can often be affected by factors acting in the final phase of the crop cycle and not dependent on the fertilization treatments. Therefore, we decided to compare our algorithm (ALG) versus the traditional application of fertilizer (TRD) by evaluating the crop growth 1.5 months after the fertilization time. The algorithm was tested on a sorghum crop under organic farming, managed with or without manure. The saving of N obtained with ALG was equal to 14 and 5 kg ha − 1 (-14 and − 10% for the non-manure and fertilized treatments, respectively). The NDVI values acquired after fertilization showed a remarkable reduction of relative standard deviation for ALG system (from 22 to 9% and from 34 to 14% for manured and not manured, respectively), which was not found for TRD system (from 16 to 17% and from 29 to 18% for manured and not manured, respectively). The above ground biomass produced was statistically equivalent for the two systems in the manured plots and significant higher for ALG in not-manured plots (+ 0.74 t ha − 1 of dm, equal to + 23%). Finally, the indices calculated to evaluate the Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) were consistently better in the ALG theses.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
ALG saved 14 kg ha − 1 nitrogen in non-manured sorghum plots versus TRD.
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The saving of N obtained with ALG was equal to 14 and 5 kg ha − 1 (-14 and − 10% for the non-manure and fertilized treatments, respectively)”
e1“sorghum crop”
e2“traditional application of fertilizer (TRD)”
Claim · model-written summary
ALG saved 5 kg ha − 1 nitrogen in fertilized sorghum plots versus TRD.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The saving of N obtained with ALG was equal to 14 and 5 kg ha − 1 (-14 and − 10% for the non-manure and fertilized treatments, respectively)”
e1“sorghum crop”
e2“traditional application of fertilizer (TRD)”
Claim · model-written summary
After ALG fertilization, NDVI relative standard deviation fell from 22 to 9% in manured plots.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“from 22 to 9% and from 34 to 14% for manured and not manured, respectively”
e1“sorghum crop”
e2“relative standard deviation”
e3“TRD system”
Claim · model-written summary
After ALG fertilization, NDVI relative standard deviation fell from 34 to 14% in unmanured plots.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“from 22 to 9% and from 34 to 14% for manured and not manured, respectively”
e1“sorghum crop”
e2“relative standard deviation”
e3“TRD system”
Claim · model-written summary
TRD NDVI relative standard deviation changed from 16 to 17% in manured plots.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“from 16 to 17% and from 29 to 18% for manured and not manured, respectively”
e1“sorghum crop”
e2“relative standard deviation”
Claim · model-written summary
TRD NDVI relative standard deviation changed from 29 to 18% in unmanured plots.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“from 16 to 17% and from 29 to 18% for manured and not manured, respectively”
e1“sorghum crop”
e2“relative standard deviation”
Claim · model-written summary
ALG and TRD yielded statistically equivalent aboveground biomass in manured plots.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The above ground biomass produced was statistically equivalent for the two systems in the manured plots”
e1“sorghum crop”
Claim · model-written summary
ALG yielded significantly more biomass than TRD in unmanured plots, by 0.74 t ha − 1 dry matter or 23%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant higher for ALG in not-manured plots (+ 0.74 t ha − 1 of dm, equal to + 23%)”
e1“sorghum crop”
e2“above ground biomass”
e3“traditional application of fertilizer (TRD)”
Claim · model-written summary
ALG consistently improved nitrogen use efficiency indices versus TRD.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the indices calculated to evaluate the Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) were consistently better in the ALG theses”
e1“sorghum crop”
e2“traditional application of fertilizer (TRD)”