Paper · 2024 · Plant Health Progress

Copper Efficacy Field Trials for Control of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci in Nicotiana tabacum Production

A. B. Webb; W. A. Bailey

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Since 2015, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci tox − has become the most significant foliar disease in the dark tobacco growing regions of Kentucky and Tennessee. Streptomycin sulfate, the main control mechanism that growers utilize to combat this bacterial disease, has evidence of resistance at 200 ppm. Field trials were established to evaluate the efficacy of copper-based products for control of angular leaf spot compared with streptomycin sulfate. Field trials were conducted from 2020 to 2022 at the West Farm of Murray State University in Murray, KY, to evaluate the efficacy of streptomycin sulfate, cuprous oxide, copper sulfate pentahydrate, and copper octanoate. In all years, the moderately susceptible dark tobacco variety KT D8LC was planted and inoculated with a streptomycin-sensitive isolate of P. syringae pv. tabaci. Tobacco treated with five applications of copper octanoate had a lower area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) than tobacco treated with streptomycin sulfate in 2020 and 2022. Data analysis showed that in one of the three years, tobacco treated with cuprous oxide had a higher yield compared with tobacco treated with streptomycin sulfate. Tobacco treated with cuprous oxide had a higher quality grade index compared with streptomycin sulfate in 2020. Although no treatment eliminated this bacterial disease, copper products, particularly cuprous oxide and copper octanoate, are suitable alternatives to streptomycin sulfate for management of angular leaf spot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five copper octanoate applications lowered disease progress relative to streptomycin in 2020 and 2022.

Treatment
five applications of copper octanoatee0
Outcome
area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC)e0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
2020 and 2022e0
Comparator
streptomycin sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco treated with five applications of copper octanoate had a lower area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) than tobacco treated with streptomycin sulfate in 2020 and 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuprous oxide raised tobacco yield over streptomycin in one of three years.

Treatment
cuprous oxidee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
one of the three yearse0
Comparator
streptomycin sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in one of the three years, tobacco treated with cuprous oxide had a higher yield compared with tobacco treated with streptomycin sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuprous oxide raised tobacco quality grade index versus streptomycin in 2020.

Treatment
cuprous oxidee0
Outcome
quality grade indexe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
2020e0
Comparator
streptomycin sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco treated with cuprous oxide had a higher quality grade index compared with streptomycin sulfate in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1291 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No treatment eliminated angular leaf spot.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Outcome
no treatment eliminated this bacterial diseasee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although no treatment eliminated this bacterial disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nicotiana tabacum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–96 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend cuprous oxide and copper octanoate as alternatives for angular leaf spot management.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
cuprous oxide and copper octanoatee0
Outcome
suitable alternatives to streptomycin sulfate for management of angular leaf spote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“copper products, particularly cuprous oxide and copper octanoate, are suitable alternatives to streptomycin sulfate for management of angular leaf spot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nicotiana tabacum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–96 · show in text ↑

copper atom · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.