Paper · 2024 · Pest Management Science

A rapid real‐time PCR assay for detecting Microdochium paspali causing sparse leaf patch on seashore paspalum and in environmental samples

Yixuan Kong; Peiyuan Jin; Chenchen Jia; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Sparse leaf patch (SLP) is one of the most significant diseases affecting seashore paspalum ( Paspalum vaginatum Sw.), caused by Microdochium paspali . Fast and accurate detection of this pathogen is crucial for effective disease management. However, conventional culture‐based methods are time‐consuming and often compromised by the presence of other saprophytic or endophytic fungi. RESULTS In this study, we developed a real‐time fluorescent quantitative (q)PCR method based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal RNA gene to rapidly detect and quantify M. paspali . The qPCR assay demonstrated the ability to detect all 12 tested isolates of M. paspali , with no cross‐reactions observed when tested against 30 isolates of other fungal pathogens from turfgrass samples. The detection limit of the qPCR method was as low as 3.65 × 10 2 copies μL −1 of M. paspali genomic DNA, and the entire detection process could be completed within 1 h. The fluorescence signal was detectable in the leaf tissues of seashore paspalum without apparent disease symptoms as early as 24 h postinoculation with M. paspali . Moreover, the qPCR method successfully detected M. paspali in both asymptomatic and symptomatic turfgrass samples, including leaf, stem, root and rhizosphere soil, indicating that this assay can significantly enhance the detection of M. paspali . CONCLUSION The study developed a rapid real‐time qPCR assay for the detection of M. paspali causing SLP on seashore paspalum and in environmental samples, which has important implications for early warning and management of SLP. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The assay detected all 12 tested Microdochium paspali isolates.

Taxon
seashore paspalumPaspalum vaginatumt0
Interactor
M. paspaliMicrodochium paspalie0pathogen
Outcome
detect all 12 tested isolates of M. paspalie0
Value
12e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Paspalum vaginatum
Paspalum vaginatum · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The qPCR assay demonstrated the ability to detect all 12 tested isolates of M. paspali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“seashore paspalum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–109 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The assay showed no cross-reactions with 30 other fungal isolates.

Taxon
seashore paspalumPaspalum vaginatumt0
Outcome
cross‐reactionse0
Direction
no cross‐reactionse0
Value
30 isolatese0
Comparator
other fungal pathogense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Paspalum vaginatum
Paspalum vaginatum · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“seashore paspalum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“no cross‐reactions observed when tested against 30 isolates of other fungal pathogens from turfgrass samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–819 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The qPCR detection limit was 3.65 × 10 2 copies μL −1 of pathogen DNA.

Taxon
seashore paspalumPaspalum vaginatumt0
Interactor
M. paspaliMicrodochium paspalie0pathogen
Outcome
detection limite0
Value
3.65 × 10 2 copies μL −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Paspalum vaginatum
Paspalum vaginatum · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“seashore paspalum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“The detection limit of the qPCR method was as low as 3.65 × 10 2 copies μL −1 of M. paspali genomic DNA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–923 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The detection process took within one hour.

Taxon
seashore paspalumPaspalum vaginatumt0
Outcome
detection processe0
Value
1 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Paspalum vaginatum
Paspalum vaginatum · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“seashore paspalum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“the entire detection process could be completed within 1 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–988 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fluorescence signal was detectable in asymptomatic leaves 24 hours after inoculation.

Taxon
seashore paspalumPaspalum vaginatume0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Interactor
M. paspaliMicrodochium paspalie0pathogen
Outcome
fluorescence signale0
Value
24 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Paspalum vaginatum
Paspalum vaginatum · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fluorescence signal was detectable in the leaf tissues of seashore paspalum without apparent disease symptoms as early as 24 h postinoculation with M. paspali .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1153 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The assay detected Microdochium paspali in asymptomatic and symptomatic turfgrass samples.

Taxon
seashore paspalumPaspalum vaginatumt0
Interactor
M. paspaliMicrodochium paspalie0pathogen
Outcome
detected M. paspalie0
Comparator
asymptomatic and symptomatic turfgrass samplese0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Paspalum vaginatum
Paspalum vaginatum · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“seashore paspalum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“the qPCR method successfully detected M. paspali in both asymptomatic and symptomatic turfgrass samples, including leaf, stem, root and rhizosphere soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1316 · show in text ↑