Paper · 2024 · South African Journal of Botany

Genetic diversity analysis of a germplasm collection of red sanders (Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.) using cross-species SSR, ISSR and RAPD markers

Priyanka Saxena; Litu Malik; Swapnendu Pattanaik; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Pterocarpus santalinus L.f. is an endangered tree species that is cherished worldwide for its valuable deep red-colored heartwood, which has multiple uses. This species exhibits a wide range of medicinal properties and offers immense potential for the discovery of bioactive compounds of pharmacological importance. The overharvesting of this species for heartwood has led to a gradual decline in its natural populations, thereby depleting its genetic resources and contributing to the loss of genetic diversity. Therefore, it is essential to assess genetic diversity, as such information allows for the effective conservation and utilization of genetic resources. In the present study, the genetic diversity and population structure among 40 germplasm accessions originating from 8 populations of P. santalinus were analyzed using six cross-species simple sequence repeats (SSR), 20 each of inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. SSR markers revealed higher polymorphism (100 %), followed by ISSRs (82.81 %) and RAPDs (67.50 %), across all the accessions. The mean values of the polymorphic information content (PIC), effective multiplex ratio (EMR), and marker index (MI) were higher for SSRs (0.84, 9.17, and 7.7), followed by ISSRs (0.262, 4.474, and 1.251) and RAPDs (0.204, 3.268 and 0.970, respectively), indicating the superiority of SSRs in detecting polymorphisms in red sanders. Similarly, the estimates of Nei's gene diversity (H) and Shannon's information index (I) varied across the studied accessions, with the highest values for SSRs ( H = 0.528, I = 0.923), followed by ISSRs ( H = 0.287, I = 0.428) and RAPDs ( H = 0.206, I = 0.307). However, the genetic statistic (Gst) or fixation statistic (Fst) and gene flow (Nm) values were higher for RAPDs (0.455 and 0.598) and ISSRs (0.446 and 0.620) than for SSRs (0.383 and 0.489, respectively), indicating significant genetic differentiation of the populations and moderate gene flow among the populations. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) with SSR, ISSR, and RAPD markers revealed that a greater proportion of genetic variation resided within populations (74 %, 69 %, and 66 %, respectively) than among populations (26 %, 31 %, and 34 %, respectively). Hierarchical clustering on the basis of RAPDs grouped most of the accessions according to the population of origin; however, this clustering was different for the ISSR and SSR markers. STRUCTURE analysis divided the accessions into four, two, and three groups with SSR, ISSR, and RAPD markers, respectively, with admixtures detected in all the groups pointing toward shared genetic lineages and diverse genetic ancestry among the accessions of different populations. Overall, the populations of Gumudipoondi of Tamil Nadu and K.V. Bhavi of Andhra Pradesh were genetically more diverse than other populations, as revealed by genetic diversity estimates obtained with SSR and ISSR marker systems; therefore, the accessions of these populations must be prioritized for conservation and utilization in breeding programs for genetic improvement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSR markers showed 100 % polymorphism, higher than ISSR and RAPD markers.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
polymorphisme0
Direction
highere0
Value
100 %e0
Comparator
ISSRse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSR markers revealed higher polymorphism (100 %), followed by ISSRs (82.81 %) and RAPDs (67.50 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISSR markers showed 82.81 % polymorphism.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
polymorphisme0
Value
82.81 %e0
Qualifier
ISSRse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSR markers revealed higher polymorphism (100 %), followed by ISSRs (82.81 %) and RAPDs (67.50 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD markers showed 67.50 % polymorphism.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
polymorphisme0
Value
67.50 %e0
Qualifier
RAPDse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSR markers revealed higher polymorphism (100 %), followed by ISSRs (82.81 %) and RAPDs (67.50 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSR markers had the highest mean PIC, EMR, and MI values.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
polymorphic information content (PIC), effective multiplex ratio (EMR), and marker index (MI)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.84, 9.17, and 7.7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean values of the polymorphic information content (PIC), effective multiplex ratio (EMR), and marker index (MI) were higher for SSRs (0.84, 9.17, and 7.7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISSR marker means for PIC, EMR, and MI were 0.262, 4.474, and 1.251.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
ISSRse0
Value
0.262, 4.474, and 1.251e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ISSRs (0.262, 4.474, and 1.251)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD marker means for PIC, EMR, and MI were 0.204, 3.268, and 0.970.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
RAPDse0
Value
0.204, 3.268 and 0.970e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RAPDs (0.204, 3.268 and 0.970, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSR estimates of Nei diversity and Shannon index were highest.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
Nei's gene diversity (H) and Shannon's information index (I)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
H = 0.528, I = 0.923e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the estimates of Nei's gene diversity (H) and Shannon's information index (I) varied across the studied accessions, with the highest values for SSRs ( H = 0.528, I = 0.923)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD and ISSR markers gave higher differentiation and gene flow statistics than SSR markers.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
genetic statistic (Gst) or fixation statistic (Fst) and gene flow (Nm)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SSRse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetic statistic (Gst) or fixation statistic (Fst) and gene flow (Nm) values were higher for RAPDs (0.455 and 0.598) and ISSRs (0.446 and 0.620) than for SSRs (0.383 and 0.489, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More genetic variation occurred within than among populations across all three marker systems.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
genetic variatione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
among populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greater proportion of genetic variation resided within populations (74 %, 69 %, and 66 %, respectively) than among populations (26 %, 31 %, and 34 %, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2107–2272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD clustering largely followed population of origin, unlike ISSR and SSR clustering.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
grouped most of the accessions according to the population of origine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hierarchical clustering on the basis of RAPDs grouped most of the accessions according to the population of origin; however, this clustering was different for the ISSR and SSR markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2274–2457 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STRUCTURE separated accessions into four, two, and three groups with SSR, ISSR, and RAPD markers, respectively.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
divided the accessions into four, two, and three groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“STRUCTURE analysis divided the accessions into four, two, and three groups with SSR, ISSR, and RAPD markers, respectively, with admixtures detected in all the groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2459–2624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Admixture was detected in all inferred groups.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
admixtures detected in all the groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“admixtures detected in all the groups pointing toward shared genetic lineages and diverse genetic ancestry among the accessions of different populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2587–2739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gumudipoondi and K.V. Bhavi populations were more genetically diverse than other populations.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
genetically more diversee0
Direction
more diversee0
Setting
Tamil Nadue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the populations of Gumudipoondi of Tamil Nadu and K.V. Bhavi of Andhra Pradesh were genetically more diverse than other populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2750–2881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend prioritizing Gumudipoondi and K.V. Bhavi accessions for conservation and breeding.

Taxon
Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.Pterocarpus santalinust0
Outcome
prioritized for conservation and utilization in breeding programs for genetic improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus santalinus
Pterocarpus santalinus · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the accessions of these populations must be prioritized for conservation and utilization in breeding programs for genetic improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2980–3113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–96 · show in text ↑