Paper · 2024 · Smart Agricultural Technology

Reinforcement learning-based assimilation of the WOFOST crop model

Haochong Chen; Xiangning Yuan; Jian Kang; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Crop model assimilation is a crucial technique for improving the accuracy and precision of crop models by integrating observational data and crop models. Although conventional data assimilation methods such as Kalman filtering and variational methods have been widely applied, these methods often face limitations in data quality, model bias, and high computational complexity. This study explored the potential of reinforcement learning (RL) for crop model assimilation, which has the advantage of not requiring large datasets. Based on the WOFOST crop model, two RL environments were constructed: a Daily-Data Driven approach and a Time-Series Driven approach. The Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm was used to train these environments for 100,000 iterations. The assimilation results were compared with the commonly used SUBPLEX optimization algorithm using four-year field measurement data and a public dataset with added random errors. Our results demonstrate that the Time-Series Driven RL model achieved assimilation accuracy comparable to the SUBPLEX optimization algorithm, with an average MAE of 0.65 compared to 0.76 for SUBPLEX, and a slight decrease in RMSE, while significantly reducing the computational burden by 365 times. In a multi-year stability test, the Time-Series Driven RL model and SUBPLEX had similar assimilation performance. This study demonstrates the potential of RL for crop model assimilation, providing a novel approach to overcome the limitations of conventional assimilation algorithms. The findings suggest that RL-based crop model assimilation can improve model accuracy and efficiency, with potential for practical applications in precision agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time-Series Driven RL achieved MAE 0.65 versus 0.76 for SUBPLEX.

Taxon
cropt0
Outcome
average MAEe0
Direction
comparablee0
Value
0.65e0
Qualifier
0.76e0
Comparator
SUBPLEXe0

Verbatim

e0

“Time-Series Driven RL model achieved assimilation accuracy comparable to the SUBPLEX optimization algorithm, with an average MAE of 0.65 compared to 0.76 for SUBPLEX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time-Series Driven RL slightly decreased RMSE relative to SUBPLEX.

Taxon
cropt0
Outcome
RMSEe0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
SUBPLEXe1

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0

“a slight decrease in RMSE, while significantly reducing the computational burden by 365 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1249 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to 0.76 for SUBPLEX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Time-Series Driven RL reduced computational burden by 365 times.

Taxon
cropt0
Outcome
computational burdene0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
365 timese0
Comparator
SUBPLEXe1

Verbatim

e0

“significantly reducing the computational burden by 365 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1249 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to 0.76 for SUBPLEX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time-Series Driven RL and SUBPLEX had similar performance in a multi-year stability test.

Taxon
cropt0
Outcome
assimilation performancee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
SUBPLEXe0

Verbatim

e0

“In a multi-year stability test, the Time-Series Driven RL model and SUBPLEX had similar assimilation performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑