Paper · 2024 · Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi

Evaluation of Soil Tillage and Direct Sowing Systems for Sustainable Production in Tokat Kazova in Terms of Sowing Quality

Esra Nur Gül; Engin Özgöz; Nurhan Mutlu

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the study carried out in Tokat conditions, located in the transition climate zone, the sowing quality of the second crop was determined. Conventional tillage system (M1), reduced tillage system-1 (M2), reduced tillage system-2 (M3), and direct seeding (M4) systems were compared. The sowing quality was determined according to the percentage of emerged seedlings, the quality of feed index, multiple index, mass index, planting index, yield, and sowing depth. The lowest and highest values of the percentage of emerged seedlings where soil tillage systems did not have a significant effect, were obtained in the M4 (64.53%) and M1 (76.53%) systems, respectively. Soil tillage systems significantly affected the quality of feed index and multiple index values at P

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seeding (M4) gave the lowest percentage of emerged seedlings, 64.53%, with no significant tillage effect on emergence.

Treatment
direct seeding (M4)e2
Outcome
percentage of emerged seedlingse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
64.53%e0
Comparator
Conventional tillage system (M1)e3
Setting
Tokat conditionse4

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest and highest values of the percentage of emerged seedlings where soil tillage systems did not have a significant effect, were obtained in the M4 (64.53%) and M1 (76.53%) systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–664 · show in text ↑
e2

“direct seeding (M4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–259 · show in text ↑
e3

“Conventional tillage system (M1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–172 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the study carried out in Tokat conditions, located in the transition climate zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage (M1) gave the highest percentage of emerged seedlings, 76.53%, with no significant tillage effect on emergence.

Treatment
Conventional tillage system (M1)e3
Outcome
percentage of emerged seedlingse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
76.53%e0
Comparator
direct seeding (M4)e2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest and highest values of the percentage of emerged seedlings where soil tillage systems did not have a significant effect, were obtained in the M4 (64.53%) and M1 (76.53%) systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–664 · show in text ↑
e2

“direct seeding (M4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–259 · show in text ↑
e3

“Conventional tillage system (M1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–172 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil tillage systems significantly affected the quality of feed index and multiple index values.

Treatment
Soil tillage systemse1
Outcome
quality of feed index and multiple index valuese1

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Soil tillage systems significantly affected the quality of feed index and multiple index values at P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–766 · show in text ↑