Paper · 2024 · Horticulturae

Evaluation of Novel Picolinamide Fungicides (QiI) for Controlling Cercospora beticola Sacc. in Sugar Beet

Akos F. Biró; Andy J. Leader; Andrea Hufnagl; et al.

7
claims
23
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Studies were initiated to find new effective fungicides to use under field conditions to discover novel approaches for optimizing disease management in sugar beet crops. Cercospora leaf spot (CLS), a prevalent foliar disease in sugar beet crops worldwide, is caused by the fungal pathogen Cercospora beticola Sacc. This disease has become the most prevalent pathogen in sugar beet crops across nearly all European growing regions, including Hungary. The epidemic spread of this disease can cause up to 50% yield loss. The use of fungicides has been a cornerstone in managing CLS of sugar beet due to the limited efficacy of non-chemical alternatives. However, the emergence of fungicide-resistant strains of Cercospora beticola Sacc. in recent decades has compromised the effectiveness of certain fungicides, particularly those belonging to the QoI (FRAC Group 11) and DMI (FRAC Group 3) classes. Hungary is among the many countries where resistance to these fungicides has developed due to their frequent application. Picolinamides represent a novel class of fungal respiration inhibitors targeting Complex III within the Quinoine-Inside Inhibitor (QiI) group. Two innovative fungicides from this class, fenpicoxamid and florylpicoxamid (both classified under FRAC Group 21), were evaluated for their efficacy in managing CLS of sugar beet in Hungary during the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons. Both fungicides were applied as formulated products at various application rates and demonstrated superior efficacy in controlling CLS compared to untreated control plots and the reference fungicides difenoconazole and epoxiconazole. The results consistently demonstrated that all tested application rates of fenpicoxamid and florylpicoxamid effectively controlled CLS in sugar beet, exhibiting a clear dose–response relationship. Disease severity, as measured by the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC), was significantly correlated with yield reduction but showed no significant association with root sugar content. Moreover, data from both study years indicated that picolinamide fungicides applied at a rate of 75 g ai/ha significantly outperformed difenoconazole (100 g ai/ha) in controlling the CLS of sugar beet. Additionally, higher application rates of picolinamides at 100–150 g ai/ha outperformed epoxiconazole at 125 g ai/ha in disease suppression. Fenpicoxamid is currently registered for use in cereals within Europe, and outside of Europe in Banana against Black Sigatoka (eff. Mycosphaerella fijiensis). Florylpicoxamid, while not yet registered in Europe, is undergoing approval processes in various countries worldwide for a range of crops and is continually being evaluated for potential market introduction. Additional details regarding the efficacy of florylpicoxamid against CLS in sugar beet were presented at ‘The 10th International Conference on Agricultural and Biological Sciences (ABS 2024, Győr-Hungary)’ in 2024.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picolinamide fungicides gave superior control of Cercospora leaf spot compared with untreated control plots.

Treatment
fenpicoxamid and florylpicoxamide1
Interactor
Cercospora beticolaCercospora beticolae5pathogen
Outcome
efficacy in controlling CLSe0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0
Setting
Hungarye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora beticola
Cercospora beticola · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both fungicides were applied as formulated products at various application rates and demonstrated superior efficacy in controlling CLS compared to untreated control plots and the reference fungicides difenoconazole and epoxiconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1626 · show in text ↑
e1

“all tested application rates of fenpicoxamid and florylpicoxamid effectively controlled CLS in sugar beet, exhibiting a clear dose–response relationship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1823 · show in text ↑
e5

“caused by the fungal pathogen Cercospora beticola Sacc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–313 · show in text ↑
e6

“were evaluated for their efficacy in managing CLS of sugar beet in Hungary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picolinamide fungicides were superior to the reference fungicides difenoconazole and epoxiconazole in controlling Cercospora leaf spot.

Treatment
fenpicoxamid and florylpicoxamide1
Interactor
Cercospora beticolaCercospora beticolae5pathogen
Outcome
efficacy in controlling CLSe0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
reference fungicides difenoconazole and epoxiconazolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora beticola
Cercospora beticola · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both fungicides were applied as formulated products at various application rates and demonstrated superior efficacy in controlling CLS compared to untreated control plots and the reference fungicides difenoconazole and epoxiconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1626 · show in text ↑
e1

“all tested application rates of fenpicoxamid and florylpicoxamid effectively controlled CLS in sugar beet, exhibiting a clear dose–response relationship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1823 · show in text ↑
e5

“caused by the fungal pathogen Cercospora beticola Sacc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–313 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested picolinamide application rates effectively controlled Cercospora leaf spot, with a clear dose–response relationship.

Treatment
all tested application ratese1
Interactor
Cercospora beticolaCercospora beticolae5pathogen
Outcome
clear dose–response relationshipe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora beticola
Cercospora beticola · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“all tested application rates of fenpicoxamid and florylpicoxamid effectively controlled CLS in sugar beet, exhibiting a clear dose–response relationship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1823 · show in text ↑
e5

“caused by the fungal pathogen Cercospora beticola Sacc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–313 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity (AUDPC) was significantly correlated with yield reduction in sugar beet.

Interactor
Cercospora beticolaCercospora beticolae5pathogen
Outcome
yield reductione2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora beticola
Cercospora beticola · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“Disease severity, as measured by the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC), was significantly correlated with yield reduction but showed no significant association with root sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–2020 · show in text ↑
e5

“caused by the fungal pathogen Cercospora beticola Sacc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–313 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity (AUDPC) showed no significant association with root sugar content in sugar beet.

Interactor
Cercospora beticolaCercospora beticolae5pathogen
Outcome
root sugar contente2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora beticola
Cercospora beticola · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“Disease severity, as measured by the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC), was significantly correlated with yield reduction but showed no significant association with root sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–2020 · show in text ↑
e5

“caused by the fungal pathogen Cercospora beticola Sacc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Picolinamide fungicides applied at 75 g ai/ha significantly outperformed difenoconazole at 100 g ai/ha in controlling Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet.

Treatment
picolinamide fungicides applied at a rate of 75 g ai/hae3
Interactor
Cercospora beticolaCercospora beticolae5pathogen
Outcome
controlling the CLSe3
Direction
outperformede3
Comparator
difenoconazole (100 g ai/ha)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora beticola
Cercospora beticola · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“data from both study years indicated that picolinamide fungicides applied at a rate of 75 g ai/ha significantly outperformed difenoconazole (100 g ai/ha) in controlling the CLS of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2032–2222 · show in text ↑
e5

“caused by the fungal pathogen Cercospora beticola Sacc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picolinamides applied at 100–150 g ai/ha outperformed epoxiconazole at 125 g ai/ha in disease suppression.

Treatment
picolinamides at 100–150 g ai/hae4
Outcome
disease suppressione4
Direction
outperformede4
Comparator
epoxiconazole at 125 g ai/hae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“higher application rates of picolinamides at 100–150 g ai/ha outperformed epoxiconazole at 125 g ai/ha in disease suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2238–2363 · show in text ↑

florylpicoxamid · Cercospora beticola · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fungicide · Cercospora beticola · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.