Abstract

Enhancing predictive modeling accuracy in wheat (Triticum aestivum) breeding through the integration of high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) data with genomic information is crucial for maximizing genetic gain. In this study, spanning four locations in the southeastern United States over 3 years, models to predict grain yield (GY) were investigated through different cross-validation approaches. The results demonstrate the superiority of multivariate comprehensive models that incorporate both genomic and HTP data, particularly in accurately predicting GY across diverse locations and years. These HTP-incorporating models achieve prediction accuracies ranging from 0.59 to 0.68, compared to 0.40-0.54 for genomic-only models when tested under different prediction scenarios both across years and locations. The comprehensive models exhibit superior generalization to new environments and achieve the highest accuracy when trained on diverse datasets. Predictive accuracy improves as models incorporate data from multiple years, highlighting the importance of considering temporal dynamics in modeling approaches. The study reveals that multivariate prediction outperformed genomic prediction methods in predicting lines across years and locations. The percentage of top 25% lines selected based on multivariate prediction was higher compared to genomic-only models, indicated by higher specificity, which is the proportion of correctly identified top-yielding lines that matched the observed top 25% performance across different sites and years. Additionally, the study addresses the prediction of untested locations based on other locations within the same year and in new years at previously tested locations. Findings show the comprehensive models effectively extrapolate to new environments, highlighting their potential for guiding breeding strategies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HTP and genomic models predicted yield more accurately than genomic-only models, at 0.59 to 0.68 versus 0.40-0.54.

Outcome
prediction accuraciese0
Value
0.59 to 0.68e0
Qualifier
0.40-0.54e0
Comparator
genomic-only modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These HTP-incorporating models achieve prediction accuracies ranging from 0.59 to 0.68, compared to 0.40-0.54 for genomic-only models when tested under different prediction scenarios both across years and locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing prediction accuracy of grain yield in wheat lines adapted to the southeastern United States through multivariate and multi‐environment genomic prediction models incorporating spectral and thermal information”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Comprehensive models generalized to new environments better.

Outcome
superior generalization to new environmentse0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The comprehensive models exhibit superior generalization to new environments and achieve the highest accuracy when trained on diverse datasets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing prediction accuracy of grain yield in wheat lines adapted to the southeastern United States through multivariate and multi‐environment genomic prediction models incorporating spectral and thermal information”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diverse training datasets gave comprehensive models their highest accuracy.

Outcome
accuracye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
diverse datasetse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“achieve the highest accuracy when trained on diverse datasets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing prediction accuracy of grain yield in wheat lines adapted to the southeastern United States through multivariate and multi‐environment genomic prediction models incorporating spectral and thermal information”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accuracy improved when data from multiple years were included.

Outcome
Predictive accuracye0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Predictive accuracy improves as models incorporate data from multiple years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing prediction accuracy of grain yield in wheat lines adapted to the southeastern United States through multivariate and multi‐environment genomic prediction models incorporating spectral and thermal information”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multivariate prediction outperformed genomic prediction across years and locations.

Outcome
predicting linese0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
genomic prediction methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“multivariate prediction outperformed genomic prediction methods in predicting lines across years and locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing prediction accuracy of grain yield in wheat lines adapted to the southeastern United States through multivariate and multi‐environment genomic prediction models incorporating spectral and thermal information”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multivariate prediction selected a higher proportion of observed top 25% lines than genomic-only models.

Outcome
percentage of top 25% lines selectede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
genomic-only modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of top 25% lines selected based on multivariate prediction was higher compared to genomic-only models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing prediction accuracy of grain yield in wheat lines adapted to the southeastern United States through multivariate and multi‐environment genomic prediction models incorporating spectral and thermal information”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multivariate prediction had higher specificity for top-yielding lines.

Outcome
specificitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
genomic-only modelse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indicated by higher specificity, which is the proportion of correctly identified top-yielding lines that matched the observed top 25% performance across different sites and years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing prediction accuracy of grain yield in wheat lines adapted to the southeastern United States through multivariate and multi‐environment genomic prediction models incorporating spectral and thermal information”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“These HTP-incorporating models achieve prediction accuracies ranging from 0.59 to 0.68, compared to 0.40-0.54 for genomic-only models when tested under different prediction scenarios both across years and locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–807 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Comprehensive models extrapolated effectively to new environments.

Outcome
extrapolate to new environmentse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Findings show the comprehensive models effectively extrapolate to new environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing prediction accuracy of grain yield in wheat lines adapted to the southeastern United States through multivariate and multi‐environment genomic prediction models incorporating spectral and thermal information”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑