Paper · 2024 · Environment and Ecology

Effect of Organic Weed Management Techniques on Weeds Infestation, Productivity and Profitability of Summer Blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) under Midhill Conditions of Nagaland

Anjali Taku; Lanunola Tzudir; Shivani Kumari; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during the zaid season of 2022 in black gram crop (Var PU-31) at Agronomy research farm of School of Agricultural Sciences (SAS), Nagaland University, Medziphema Campus, Nagaland. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design comprised of seven weed management treatments, viz. T1: Weedy check (Control), T2: Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS, T3: Cardboard mulching, T4: Paddy straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1, T5: Saw dust mulching @ 5 t ha-1, T6: Linseed stover mulching @ 5 t ha-1 and T7: Farmer’s practice and was replicated thrice. Weed flora observations showed that Ageratum conyzoides, Amaranthus viridis, Commelina bengalensis, Phyllanthus niruri and Mimosa pudica were dominant broad leaved weeds, Cyperus rotundus and Cyperus iria were dominant among sedges and Cynodon dactylon, Eleusine indica and Echinochloa colonum were dominant among grassy weeds in the blackgram field. The experimental results revealed that treatment with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave maximum decline in weed populations and weed dry weight which was at par with paddy straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1. Hence, hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded the highest weed control efficiency among all the treatments as well as it produced highest yield and was at par with paddy straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1. Paddy straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1 gave the highest B:C ratio (1.42) among all the treatments and thus was found to be most economically sound treatment of summer black gram among all.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several broadleaf weeds, sedges and grasses dominated the blackgram field.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Interactor
Ageratum conyzoidesAgeratum conyzoidese0weed
Outcome
dominant broad leaved weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ageratum conyzoides
Ageratum conyzoides · InteractorMinghong · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ageratum conyzoides, Amaranthus viridis, Commelina bengalensis, Phyllanthus niruri and Mimosa pudica were dominant broad leaved weeds, Cyperus rotundus and Cyperus iria were dominant among sedges and Cynodon dactylon, Eleusine indica and Echinochloa colonum were dominant among grassy weeds in the blackgram field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave the greatest decline in weed populations, comparable to paddy straw mulching.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
weed populations and weed dry weighte0
Direction
maximum declinee0
Comparator
paddy straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave maximum decline in weed populations and weed dry weight which was at par with paddy straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding gave the highest weed control efficiency among treatments.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded the highest weed control efficiency among all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding produced the highest yield, comparable to paddy straw mulching.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
paddy straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded the highest weed control efficiency among all the treatments as well as it produced highest yield and was at par with paddy straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paddy straw mulching gave the highest benefit to cost ratio, 1.42.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
Paddy straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.42e0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“Paddy straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1 gave the highest B:C ratio (1.42) among all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1405 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Paddy straw mulching was judged the most economical treatment.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
Paddy straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1e0
Outcome
most economically sound treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“Paddy straw mulching @ 5 t ha-1 gave the highest B:C ratio (1.42) among all the treatments and thus was found to be most economically sound treatment of summer black gram among all”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1495 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 66 positive, 3 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 89 positive, 6 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

organic · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.