Paper · 2024 · European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences

Productivity and Profitability Assessment of Stem Amaranth and Changes in Soil Chemical Properties under Aonla-Based Multistoried Agroforestry

Tanjina Yasmin Rita; Satya Ranjan Saha; Md. Main Uddin Miah; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Aonla based multistoried agroforestry system could be a suitable model in improving agricultural productivity and profitability, particularly for the resource-poor country like Bangladesh. However, the adoption of multistoried agroforestry is still limited and most of the fruit orchards remain underutilized throughout the year. Therefore, a field experiment was carried out to evaluate the performance of stem amaranth as a lower storey crop and assess the changes in soil chemical properties under aonla based multistoried agroforestry system (MAFs). The experiment was performed at the Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Gazipur, Bangladesh throughout the time from April 2021 to June 2021, following a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. There were four treatments as follows: T1 = Aonla + carambola + lemon + stem amaranth, T2 = Aonla + lemon + stem amaranth, T3 = Aonla + stem amaranth, and T4 = Sole stem amaranth. Results demonstrated that agroforestry systems have a significant effect on the yield of stem amaranth, where sole cropping of stem amaranth (T4) and aonla + stem amaranth (T3) provided the maximum yields. In spite of yield reduction in stem amaranth by 6.8%, 31.2%, and 41.1% under T3, T2, and T1 systems, respectively, compared to the sole cropping; agroforestry systems have proven their superiority in terms of net return and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) over the sole cropping of stem amaranth. Moreover, soil fertility parameters like organic carbon, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and exchangeable potassium were changed in a positive direction under agroforestry practices. The aforementioned findings indicate that stem amaranth cultivation with aonla based MAFs is a promising approach to enhance system’s productivity, profitability and soil fertility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole stem amaranth cropping gave a maximum stem amaranth yield.

Taxon
stem amaranthe0
Treatment
sole cropping of stem amaranth (T4)e0
Outcome
maximum yieldse0
Direction
maximume0

Verbatim

e0

“sole cropping of stem amaranth (T4) and aonla + stem amaranth (T3) provided the maximum yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1189 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aonla plus stem amaranth gave a maximum stem amaranth yield among the systems.

Taxon
stem amaranthe0
Treatment
aonla + stem amaranth (T3)e0
Outcome
maximum yieldse0
Direction
maximume0

Verbatim

e0

“sole cropping of stem amaranth (T4) and aonla + stem amaranth (T3) provided the maximum yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aonla plus stem amaranth reduced stem amaranth yield by 6.8% relative to sole cropping.

Taxon
stem amaranthe0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
6.8%e0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Verbatim

e0

“yield reduction in stem amaranth by 6.8%, 31.2%, and 41.1% under T3, T2, and T1 systems, respectively, compared to the sole cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1335 · show in text ↑
e1

“T3 = Aonla + stem amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aonla plus lemon plus stem amaranth reduced stem amaranth yield by 31.2% relative to sole cropping.

Taxon
stem amaranthe0
Treatment
T2e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
31.2%e0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Verbatim

e0

“yield reduction in stem amaranth by 6.8%, 31.2%, and 41.1% under T3, T2, and T1 systems, respectively, compared to the sole cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1335 · show in text ↑
e1

“T2 = Aonla + lemon + stem amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aonla plus carambola plus lemon plus stem amaranth reduced stem amaranth yield by 41.1% relative to sole cropping.

Taxon
stem amaranthe0
Treatment
T1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
41.1%e0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Verbatim

e0

“yield reduction in stem amaranth by 6.8%, 31.2%, and 41.1% under T3, T2, and T1 systems, respectively, compared to the sole cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1335 · show in text ↑
e1

“T1 = Aonla + carambola + lemon + stem amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agroforestry systems had higher net return and benefit-cost ratio than sole stem amaranth cropping.

Taxon
stem amaranthe0
Treatment
agroforestry systemse0
Outcome
net return and benefit-cost ratio (BCR)e0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
sole cropping of stem amaranthe0

Verbatim

e0

“agroforestry systems have proven their superiority in terms of net return and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) over the sole cropping of stem amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agroforestry practices positively changed soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and available phosphorus.

Taxon
stem amaranthe1
Treatment
agroforestry practicese0
Outcome
organic carbon, total nitrogen, available phosphoruse0
Direction
positive directione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil fertility parameters like organic carbon, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and exchangeable potassium were changed in a positive direction under agroforestry practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1668 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem amaranth cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1712–1737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agroforestry practices positively changed soil exchangeable potassium.

Taxon
stem amaranthe1
Treatment
agroforestry practicese0
Outcome
exchangeable potassiume0
Direction
positive directione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil fertility parameters like organic carbon, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and exchangeable potassium were changed in a positive direction under agroforestry practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1668 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem amaranth cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1712–1737 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered stem amaranth cultivation in aonla agroforestry promising for productivity, profitability and soil fertility.

Taxon
stem amaranthe0
Outcome
stem amaranth cultivation with aonla based MAFs is a promising approach to enhance system’s productivity, profitability and soil fertilitye0

Verbatim

e0

“stem amaranth cultivation with aonla based MAFs is a promising approach to enhance system’s productivity, profitability and soil fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1712–1850 · show in text ↑

intercropping · nutrient: content · Amaranthus caudatus (amaranth)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · yield · Amaranthus caudatus (amaranth)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.