Paper · 2024 · Forests

Mycorrhizal Diversity on Roots of Silver Birch and Hybrid Aspen in Clonal Plantations in Northern Europe, Latvia

Roberts Matisons; Zigmunds Orlovskis; Kārlis Trevors Blūms; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mycorrhizal fungi contribute to crop growth, yields, and stress tolerance. In forests, common mycorrhizal networks are suggested to function as carbon storage and to transfer substances and signals between trees, thus likely contributing to their resilience. Such properties are crucial under increasing environmental stresses, particularly for clonal forestry. However, mycorrhizal communities in relation to tree field performances have been scarcely studied. In this study, mycorrhizal communities on the roots of clones of silver birch and hybrid aspen growing in distinct trials in deep automorphous mineral soils (podzolic and fluvic) under hemiboreal conditions were assessed using internal transcribed spacer sequencing, bioinformatics, and community analysis. The mycorrhizal communities were moderately rich/diverse and were mostly formed by generalist taxa (prevailingly ectomycorrhizal) common for the region. The differences in communities among the tree clones were estimated for silver birch, while for hybrid aspen, the productivity of clones was inversely related to the richness and diversity of the communities, suggesting a top-down effect of the host. Accordingly, some mycorrhizal taxa (e.g., Hyaloscypha sp.) showed clone-specific abundances indicating a preference for a specific host. These findings prompt further functional studies and highlight the need to consider genetic differences of forest regenerative material for maximizing mycorrhizal diversity, as well as for more effective inoculation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root mycorrhizal communities were moderately rich and diverse.

Taxon
Silver Bircht0
Outcome
mycorrhizal communitiese0
Direction
moderately rich/diversee0

Verbatim

e0

“The mycorrhizal communities were moderately rich/diverse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silver Birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root mycorrhizal communities were moderately rich and diverse.

Taxon
Hybrid Aspent0
Outcome
mycorrhizal communitiese0
Direction
moderately rich/diversee0

Verbatim

e0

“The mycorrhizal communities were moderately rich/diverse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal communities were mainly generalist taxa, mostly ectomycorrhizal.

Taxon
Silver Bircht0
Outcome
generalist taxa (prevailingly ectomycorrhizal)e0

Verbatim

e0

“were mostly formed by generalist taxa (prevailingly ectomycorrhizal) common for the region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silver Birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal communities were mainly generalist taxa, mostly ectomycorrhizal.

Taxon
Hybrid Aspent0
Outcome
generalist taxa (prevailingly ectomycorrhizal)e0

Verbatim

e0

“were mostly formed by generalist taxa (prevailingly ectomycorrhizal) common for the region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver birch clones differed in mycorrhizal communities.

Taxon
Silver Bircht0
Material
tree clonese0
Outcome
differences in communitiese0

Verbatim

e0

“The differences in communities among the tree clones were estimated for silver birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silver Birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid aspen clone productivity was inversely related to mycorrhizal richness and diversity.

Taxon
Hybrid Aspent0
Material
clonese0
Outcome
productivity of clonese0
Direction
inversely relatede0

Verbatim

e0

“for hybrid aspen, the productivity of clones was inversely related to the richness and diversity of the communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some mycorrhizal taxa, including Hyaloscypha sp., showed clone specific abundance.

Taxon
Hybrid Aspent0
Interactor
Hyaloscypha sp.Hyaloscyphae0symbiont
Outcome
clone-specific abundancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hyaloscypha
Hyaloscypha · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some mycorrhizal taxa (e.g., Hyaloscypha sp.) showed clone-specific abundances indicating a preference for a specific host”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend considering genetic differences of forest regenerative material to maximize mycorrhizal diversity and improve inoculation.

Taxon
Silver Bircht0
Outcome
consider genetic differences of forest regenerative material for maximizing mycorrhizal diversitye0

Verbatim

e0

“highlight the need to consider genetic differences of forest regenerative material for maximizing mycorrhizal diversity, as well as for more effective inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silver Birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑