Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Microbiology

The impact of Ricinus straw on tomato growth and soil microbial community

Jingyu Zhang; Minghao Liu; N’da Brou Jean Landry; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Returning straw can alter the soil microbial community, reduce the occurrence of soilborne diseases, and promote plant growth. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of Ricinus straw on tomato growth and rhizosphere microbial community. We carried out microcosm experiments to investigate the effects of Ricinus straw with different dosages (0, 1, and 3%) on tomato dry biomass and rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities. The results indicated that the dry biomass of tomato seedlings with 1% addition of Ricinus straw increased by 53.98%. In addition, Ricinus straw also changed the abundance, diversities, and composition of tomato rhizosphere microbial communities. In detail, the addition of 1% Ricinus straw increased the relative abundance of putative beneficial bacteria and fungi in straw decomposition, such as Ramlibacter sp., Azohydromonas sp., Schizothecium sp., and Acaulium sp., and decreased the relative abundance of Fusarium sp. Meanwhile, Ricinus straw inhibited the growth of putative pathogenic microorganisms. The correlation analysis showed that the changes in fungal community operational taxonomic units stimulated by the addition of Ricinus straw may play a crucial positive regulatory role in tomato growth. Finally, the representative fungal strain Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici (FOL), named TF25, was isolated and cultured. We found that Ricinus straw extract inhibited the growth of TF25 in an in vitro experiment with an inhibition rate of 34.95–51.91%. Collectively, Ricinus straw promoted plant growth by changing the rhizosphere microbial community composition and inhibiting FOL growth, which provides new evidence for understanding the improvement of key microorganism composition in improving crop growth and the sustainability of agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One percent Ricinus straw increased tomato seedling dry biomass by 53.98%.

Treatment
1% addition of Ricinus strawe0
Outcome
dry biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
53.98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dry biomass of tomato seedlings with 1% addition of Ricinus straw increased by 53.98%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ricinus straw changed the abundance, diversity and composition of tomato rhizosphere microbial communities.

Treatment
Ricinus strawe0
Outcome
abundance, diversities, and composition of tomato rhizosphere microbial communitiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ricinus straw also changed the abundance, diversities, and composition of tomato rhizosphere microbial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One percent Ricinus straw increased the relative abundance of putative beneficial bacteria and fungi.

Treatment
1% Ricinus strawe0
Interactor
Ramlibacter sp.Ramlibactere0symbiont
Outcome
relative abundance of putative beneficial bacteria and fungie0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ramlibacter
Ramlibacter · InteractorLeibniz-Institut DSMZ · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of 1% Ricinus straw increased the relative abundance of putative beneficial bacteria and fungi in straw decomposition, such as Ramlibacter sp., Azohydromonas sp., Schizothecium sp., and Acaulium sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One percent Ricinus straw decreased the relative abundance of Fusarium sp.

Treatment
1% Ricinus strawe0
Interactor
Fusarium sp.Fusariume0pathogen
Outcome
relative abundance of Fusarium sp.e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of 1% Ricinus straw increased the relative abundance of putative beneficial bacteria and fungi in straw decomposition, such as Ramlibacter sp., Azohydromonas sp., Schizothecium sp., and Acaulium sp., and decreased the relative abundance of Fusarium sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ricinus straw inhibited putative pathogenic microorganisms.

Treatment
Ricinus strawe0
Outcome
growth of putative pathogenic microorganismse0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ricinus straw inhibited the growth of putative pathogenic microorganisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in fungal community operational taxonomic units may positively regulate tomato growth.

Treatment
addition of Ricinus strawe0
Outcome
tomato growthe0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
maye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changes in fungal community operational taxonomic units stimulated by the addition of Ricinus straw may play a crucial positive regulatory role in tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1247 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal strain FOL TF25 was isolated and cultured.

Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. LycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici (FOL), named TF25, was isolated and culturede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the representative fungal strain Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici (FOL), named TF25, was isolated and cultured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ricinus straw extract inhibited FOL TF25 growth in vitro by 34.95–51.91%.

Treatment
Ricinus straw extracte0
Interactor
TF25e0pathogen
Outcome
growth of TF25e0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
34.95–51.91%e0
Setting
in vitroe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ricinus straw extract inhibited the growth of TF25 in an in vitro experiment with an inhibition rate of 34.95–51.91%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute promoted tomato growth to changed rhizosphere communities and inhibited FOL growth.

Treatment
Ricinus strawe0
Interactor
FOLe0pathogen
Outcome
plant growthe0
Qualifier
changing the rhizosphere microbial community composition and inhibiting FOL growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ricinus straw promoted plant growth by changing the rhizosphere microbial community composition and inhibiting FOL growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1642 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.