Paper · 2024 · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International

Influence of Fertigation Levels and Drip Irrigation on Yield and Quality of Summer Watermelon under with Mulch and without Mulch Conditions

Rani Bathula; Uma Devi; Madhavi; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trial was carried out during summer season at Water Technology Center fields, College Farm, PJTSAU, Hyderabad, Telangana to study the individual and combined effect of fertigation levels, mulch and drip irrigation levels on performance of watermelon for two consecutive years 2020-21 & 2021-22. The experiment consisted of 12 treatment combinations of three fertigation levels (F75, F100 & F125) & two drip irrigation levels (I0.8 & I1.0) imposed under factorial combination of with mulch (M1) and no mulch (M0). Among the fertigation levels, The F125 has recorded the highest fresh fruit yield (48.52 t ha-1), TSS (11.55 %) and lycopene content (0.68 mg 100 g-1 of sample) over F100 & F75 in the pooled data. Mulch has shown significant influence on fresh fruit yield and quality of watermelon. The M1 has registered higher fresh fruit yield (59.04 t ha-1), TSS (12.10 %) and lycopene content (0.76 mg 100 g-1 of sample) as compared to non-mulching treatment. On another hand drip irrigation levels did not shows significant effect on yield and quality of the watermelon during both the year (2020-21 and 2021-22).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F125 gave the highest fresh fruit yield, 48.52 t ha-1, compared with F100 and F75.

Taxon
Summer WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
F125e0
Outcome
fresh fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
48.52 t ha-1e0
Comparator
F100 & F75e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The F125 has recorded the highest fresh fruit yield (48.52 t ha-1), TSS (11.55 %) and lycopene content (0.68 mg 100 g-1 of sample) over F100 & F75”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F125 gave the highest TSS, 11.55 %, compared with F100 and F75.

Taxon
Summer WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
F125e0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.55 %e0
Comparator
F100 & F75e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The F125 has recorded the highest fresh fruit yield (48.52 t ha-1), TSS (11.55 %) and lycopene content (0.68 mg 100 g-1 of sample) over F100 & F75”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F125 gave the highest lycopene content, 0.68 mg 100 g-1 of sample, compared with F100 and F75.

Taxon
Summer WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
F125e0
Outcome
lycopene contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.68 mg 100 g-1 of samplee0
Comparator
F100 & F75e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The F125 has recorded the highest fresh fruit yield (48.52 t ha-1), TSS (11.55 %) and lycopene content (0.68 mg 100 g-1 of sample) over F100 & F75”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch M1 gave higher fresh fruit yield, 59.04 t ha-1, than no mulch.

Taxon
Summer WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
M1e0
Outcome
fresh fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
59.04 t ha-1e0
Comparator
non-mulching treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The M1 has registered higher fresh fruit yield (59.04 t ha-1), TSS (12.10 %) and lycopene content (0.76 mg 100 g-1 of sample) as compared to non-mulching treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch M1 gave higher TSS, 12.10 %, than no mulch.

Taxon
Summer WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
M1e0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.10 %e0
Comparator
non-mulching treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The M1 has registered higher fresh fruit yield (59.04 t ha-1), TSS (12.10 %) and lycopene content (0.76 mg 100 g-1 of sample) as compared to non-mulching treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch M1 gave higher lycopene content, 0.76 mg 100 g-1 of sample, than no mulch.

Taxon
Summer WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
M1e0
Outcome
lycopene contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.76 mg 100 g-1 of samplee0
Comparator
non-mulching treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The M1 has registered higher fresh fruit yield (59.04 t ha-1), TSS (12.10 %) and lycopene content (0.76 mg 100 g-1 of sample) as compared to non-mulching treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation levels showed no significant effect on watermelon yield and quality in either year.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
drip irrigation levelse0
Outcome
yield and qualitye0
Qualifier
during both the year (2020-21 and 2021-22)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip irrigation levels did not shows significant effect on yield and quality of the watermelon during both the year (2020-21 and 2021-22)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1122 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: general · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.