Paper · 2024 · Crop Science

Promoting rapeseed yield: Improving canopy structure and formation of large pod via adjusting planting density

Long Wang; Yiyang Li; Chen Qian; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Increasing planting density is a common practice to enhance rapeseed ( Brassica napus L.) yield via an increase in pod quantity. However, excessive density may lead to a deterioration in pod quality. Therefore, we hypothesized that improving pod quality based on a certain level of pod quantity could further increase seed yield. A randomized block experiment was conducted with five density levels (2.4, 3.6, 4.8, 6.0, and 7.2 × 10 5 plants ha −1 , referred to as D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5) using two hybrid varieties of Qinyou10 and Ningza1838. The plot seed yield reached the maximum value in D2 or D3, and there was no significant difference between these two density levels. An increase in planting density resulted in a decrease in canopy thickness, but an increase in lodging angle and pod density. According to the number of seeds per pod, the pods were categorized into low‐productive pod (≤14), middle‐productive pod (15‒17), and high‐productive pod (≥18). The number of high‐productive pod in D2 and D3 ranged from 48.15 × 10 6 to 54.22 × 10 6 ha −1 , accounting for 53.76%‒63.28% of the total pod number and 76.89%‒82.83% of the total seed yield. With the planting density increasing from D3 to D5, there was a significant transition from high‐productive pod to middle‐productive and low‐productive pods, causing a decrease in seed yield. Therefore, when the seed yield was targeted as 4500 kg ha −1 , the suitable planting density ranged from 3.6 × 10 5 to 4.8 × 10 5 plants ha −1 , and the optimal number of pods in population ranged from 83.0 × 10 6 to 94.0 × 10 6 ha −1 , and the quantity proportion of high‐productive pod maintained >50%. This study provides a guide for high‐yield cultivation of rapeseed in China and presents a novel approach to promoting a potential yield of rapeseed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plot seed yield peaked at D2 or D3.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
D2 or D3e0
Outcome
plot seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Verbatim

e0

“The plot seed yield reached the maximum value in D2 or D3, and there was no significant difference between these two density levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plot seed yield did not significantly differ between D2 and D3.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
D2e0
Outcome
plot seed yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
D3e0

Verbatim

e0

“The plot seed yield reached the maximum value in D2 or D3, and there was no significant difference between these two density levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher planting density changed canopy thickness in the stated direction.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
canopy thicknesse0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in planting density resulted in a decrease in canopy thickness, but an increase in lodging angle and pod density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher planting density changed lodging angle in the stated direction.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
lodging anglee0
Direction
increasee0

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in planting density resulted in a decrease in canopy thickness, but an increase in lodging angle and pod density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher planting density changed pod density in the stated direction.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
pod densitye0
Direction
increasee0

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in planting density resulted in a decrease in canopy thickness, but an increase in lodging angle and pod density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At D2 and D3, high productive pods accounted for 48.15 × 10 6 to 54.22 × 10 6 ha −1 of number of high‐productive pod.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Organ / stage
high‐productive pode0
Treatment
D2 and D3e0
Outcome
number of high‐productive pode0
Value
48.15 × 10 6 to 54.22 × 10 6 ha −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The number of high‐productive pod in D2 and D3 ranged from 48.15 × 10 6 to 54.22 × 10 6 ha −1 , accounting for 53.76%‒63.28% of the total pod number and 76.89%‒82.83% of the total seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At D2 and D3, high productive pods accounted for 53.76%‒63.28% of total pod number.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Organ / stage
high‐productive pode0
Treatment
D2 and D3e0
Outcome
total pod numbere0
Value
53.76%‒63.28%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The number of high‐productive pod in D2 and D3 ranged from 48.15 × 10 6 to 54.22 × 10 6 ha −1 , accounting for 53.76%‒63.28% of the total pod number and 76.89%‒82.83% of the total seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At D2 and D3, high productive pods accounted for 76.89%‒82.83% of total seed yield.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Organ / stage
high‐productive pode0
Treatment
D2 and D3e0
Outcome
total seed yielde0
Value
76.89%‒82.83%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The number of high‐productive pod in D2 and D3 ranged from 48.15 × 10 6 to 54.22 × 10 6 ha −1 , accounting for 53.76%‒63.28% of the total pod number and 76.89%‒82.83% of the total seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density from D3 to D5 shifted pods from high to middle and low productive classes.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
planting density increasing from D3 to D5e0
Outcome
transition from high‐productive pod to middle‐productive and low‐productive podse0
Direction
transitione0
Comparator
D3e0

Verbatim

e0

“With the planting density increasing from D3 to D5, there was a significant transition from high‐productive pod to middle‐productive and low‐productive pods, causing a decrease in seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shift in pod classes with density from D3 to D5 decreased seed yield.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
planting density increasing from D3 to D5e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
transition from high‐productive pod to middle‐productive and low‐productive podse0

Verbatim

e0

“With the planting density increasing from D3 to D5, there was a significant transition from high‐productive pod to middle‐productive and low‐productive pods, causing a decrease in seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For a 4500 kg ha −1 yield target, authors recommend suitable planting density of 3.6 × 10 5 to 4.8 × 10 5 plants ha −1.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Outcome
suitable planting densitye0
Value
3.6 × 10 5 to 4.8 × 10 5 plants ha −1e0
Qualifier
seed yield was targeted as 4500 kg ha −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, when the seed yield was targeted as 4500 kg ha −1 , the suitable planting density ranged from 3.6 × 10 5 to 4.8 × 10 5 plants ha −1 , and the optimal number of pods in population ranged from 83.0 × 10 6 to 94.0 × 10 6 ha −1 , and the quantity proportion of high‐productive pod maintained >50%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For a 4500 kg ha −1 yield target, authors recommend optimal number of pods in population of 83.0 × 10 6 to 94.0 × 10 6 ha −1.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Outcome
optimal number of pods in populatione0
Value
83.0 × 10 6 to 94.0 × 10 6 ha −1e0
Qualifier
seed yield was targeted as 4500 kg ha −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, when the seed yield was targeted as 4500 kg ha −1 , the suitable planting density ranged from 3.6 × 10 5 to 4.8 × 10 5 plants ha −1 , and the optimal number of pods in population ranged from 83.0 × 10 6 to 94.0 × 10 6 ha −1 , and the quantity proportion of high‐productive pod maintained >50%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For a 4500 kg ha −1 yield target, authors recommend quantity proportion of high‐productive pod of >50%.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Outcome
quantity proportion of high‐productive pode0
Value
>50%e0
Qualifier
seed yield was targeted as 4500 kg ha −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, when the seed yield was targeted as 4500 kg ha −1 , the suitable planting density ranged from 3.6 × 10 5 to 4.8 × 10 5 plants ha −1 , and the optimal number of pods in population ranged from 83.0 × 10 6 to 94.0 × 10 6 ha −1 , and the quantity proportion of high‐productive pod maintained >50%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑