Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Performance evaluation of UAV sprayer on cotton crop

RG Ingle; AK Kamble; SH Thakare; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Insecticide applications are an essential aspect of agriculture to control pests and diseases. Traditional pest control methods are time-consuming, and exposure to chemicals causes serious health problems, such as cancer, breathing difficulties, and damage to the nervous system of human beings. The present study focused on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer for insecticide application on cotton crops. The UAV sprayer was evaluated in a cotton field at 3 levels of flight height (1.5, 2.0, 2.5 m) and flight speeds (4.0, 4.5, 5.0 m/s) for effective spray distribution. The optimized operational parameters of flight speed of 4.0 m/s and flight height of 1.5 m were suggested by Design expert. The UAV was capable of spraying the liquid at the top, middle, and bottom positions of leaves satisfactorily. The VMD observed to increase with an increase in flight height and a decrease in flight speed. A similar trend was observed for NMD also. The droplet size (VMD) of cotton crop varied from 444 to 353.11 μm, and NMD varied from 49.33 to 95 μm. The droplet density decreases as flight height and flight speed increase, and the droplet density varied from 198.22 to 353.33 droplets/cm2. The reduction in the whitefly population was found to be 73.52%, and an 88.58% reduction in the pink bollworm larvae population was found in the cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A flight speed of 4.0 m/s and height of 1.5 m were suggested as optimized settings.

Outcome
optimized operational parameterse0
Value
4.0 m/se0
Qualifier
flight height of 1.5 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimized operational parameters of flight speed of 4.0 m/s and flight height of 1.5 m were suggested by Design expert.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The UAV sprayed cotton leaves satisfactorily at top, middle, and bottom positions.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
spraying the liquid at the top, middle, and bottom positions of leaves satisfactorilye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The UAV was capable of spraying the liquid at the top, middle, and bottom positions of leaves satisfactorily.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volume median diameter increased as flight height increased.

Treatment
flight heighte0
Outcome
VMDe0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The VMD observed to increase with an increase in flight height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volume median diameter increased as flight speed decreased.

Treatment
flight speede0
Outcome
VMDe0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The VMD observed to increase with an increase in flight height and a decrease in flight speed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number median diameter followed the same trend as volume median diameter across flight settings.

Treatment
flight heighte1
Outcome
NMDe0
Direction
increasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar trend was observed for NMD also.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–949 · show in text ↑
e1

“The VMD observed to increase with an increase in flight height and a decrease in flight speed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton spray droplet VMD varied from 444 to 353.11 μm.

Outcome
droplet size (VMD)e0
Direction
variede0
Value
444 to 353.11 μme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The droplet size (VMD) of cotton crop varied from 444 to 353.11 μm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton spray droplet NMD varied from 49.33 to 95 μm.

Outcome
NMDe0
Direction
variede0
Value
49.33 to 95 μme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NMD varied from 49.33 to 95 μm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Droplet density decreased with increasing flight height.

Treatment
flight heighte0
Outcome
droplet densitye0
Direction
decreasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The droplet density decreases as flight height and flight speed increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Droplet density decreased with increasing flight speed.

Treatment
flight speede0
Outcome
droplet densitye0
Direction
decreasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The droplet density decreases as flight height and flight speed increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Droplet density varied from 198.22 to 353.33 droplets/cm2.

Outcome
droplet densitye0
Value
198.22 to 353.33 droplets/cm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the droplet density varied from 198.22 to 353.33 droplets/cm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitefly population in cotton was reduced by 73.52%.

Treatment
insecticide applicatione1
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whitefly populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
73.52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in the whitefly population was found to be 73.52%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1258 · show in text ↑
e1

“The present study focused on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer for insecticide application on cotton crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pink bollworm larvae population in cotton was reduced by 88.58%.

Treatment
insecticide applicatione1
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
Outcome
pink bollworm larvae populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
88.58%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an 88.58% reduction in the pink bollworm larvae population was found in the cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1346 · show in text ↑
e1

“The present study focused on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer for insecticide application on cotton crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–410 · show in text ↑

insecticide · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

76 papers: 51 positive, 25 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

insecticide · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.