Paper · 2024 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Influence of organic sources of nutrient on mungbean performance in South-eastern Rajasthan

Rajendra Kumar Yadav; YONIKA SAINI; B.S. MEENA; et al.

14
claims
61
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the Kharif seasons of 2022 and 2023 at the organic farming block of the Agricultural Research Station, Ummedganj, Agriculture University, Kota (Rajasthan), to study the effects of organic sources of nutrient on mungbean growth and yield in the mungbean-wheat cropping system of southeastern Rajasthan. The experiment included eight treatments: T1 , Absolute control; T2 , 100% N by farm yard manure (FYM) + cow urine @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 days after sowing (DAS); T3, 100% N by FYM + panchagavya @ 5% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS; T4 , 75% N by FYM + 25% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS; T5 , 50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS; T6 , 75% N by FYM + jeevamrut @ 500 liters/ha at sowing + vermiwash @ 5% spray @ 15, 30, and 45 DAS; T7 , 100% N by FYM + NPK consortia of biofertilizers + Zinc solubilising bacteria (ZSB) each @ 62.5 ml/kg seed inoculation + amrita sanjeevani @ 500 liters/ha at sowing, 15 and 30 DAS and 75% N by FYM + NPK consortia of biofertilizers @ 62.5 ml/kg seed inoculation + sasyagavya @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS (T8 ). The treatments were arranged in a randomized block design with 3 replications. The 2-years pooled results showed that the treatment T5 produced significantly higher values for plant height (54.62 cm), number of branches/plant (9.65), total number of effective nodules/plant (31.65), fresh and dry weight of root nodules/plant (119.94 mg and 23.98 mg, respectively), number of pods/plant (26.28), number of seeds/pod (9.39), pod length (8.17 cm), test weight (34.99 g), seed yield (1242 kg/ha), and straw yield (2,204 kg/ha) compared to the absolute control. These results were statistically on par with the T3 and T7 treatments, and the seed yield was found at par with T3 in the pooled analysis. Hence, the application of 50% N by FYM and 50% N by vermicompost, along with vermiwash spray, is highly effective mungbean yield in the South Eastern Rajasthan for enhancing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased mungbean plant height to 54.62 cm relative to absolute control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DASe1
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
highere3
Value
54.62 cme2
Comparator
absolute controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“plant height (54.62 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1375 · show in text ↑
e3

“produced significantly higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1347 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared to the absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased branches per mungbean plant to 9.65 relative to absolute control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DASe1
Outcome
number of branches/plante2
Direction
highere3
Value
9.65e2
Comparator
absolute controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of branches/plant (9.65)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1408 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1347 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared to the absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased effective nodules per mungbean plant to 31.65 relative to absolute control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DASe1
Outcome
total number of effective nodules/plante2
Direction
highere3
Value
31.65e2
Comparator
absolute controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“total number of effective nodules/plant (31.65)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1457 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1347 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared to the absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased fresh root nodule weight per mungbean plant to 119.94 mg relative to absolute control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DASe1
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of root nodules/plante2
Direction
highere3
Value
119.94 mge2
Comparator
absolute controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“fresh and dry weight of root nodules/plant (119.94 mg and 23.98 mg, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1540 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1347 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared to the absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased dry root nodule weight per mungbean plant to 23.98 mg relative to absolute control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DASe1
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of root nodules/plante2
Direction
highere3
Value
23.98 mge2
Comparator
absolute controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“fresh and dry weight of root nodules/plant (119.94 mg and 23.98 mg, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1540 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1347 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared to the absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased mungbean pods per plant to 26.28 relative to absolute control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DASe1
Outcome
number of pods/plante2
Direction
highere3
Value
26.28e2
Comparator
absolute controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of pods/plant (26.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1570 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1347 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared to the absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased mungbean seeds per pod to 9.39 relative to absolute control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DASe1
Outcome
number of seeds/pode2
Direction
highere3
Value
9.39e2
Comparator
absolute controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of seeds/pod (9.39)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1598 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1347 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared to the absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased mungbean pod length to 8.17 cm relative to absolute control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DASe1
Outcome
pod lengthe2
Direction
highere3
Value
8.17 cme2
Comparator
absolute controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“pod length (8.17 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1620 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1347 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared to the absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased mungbean test weight to 34.99 g relative to absolute control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DASe1
Outcome
test weighte2
Direction
highere3
Value
34.99 ge2
Comparator
absolute controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“test weight (34.99 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1643 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1347 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared to the absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased mungbean seed yield to 1242 kg/ha relative to absolute control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DASe1
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
highere3
Value
1242 kg/hae2
Comparator
absolute controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed yield (1242 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1668 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1347 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared to the absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased mungbean straw yield to 2,204 kg/ha relative to absolute control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DASe1
Outcome
straw yielde2
Direction
highere3
Value
2,204 kg/hae2
Comparator
absolute controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% N by FYM + 50% N by vermicompost + vermiwash @ 10% spray at 15, 30, and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“straw yield (2,204 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1699 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1347 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared to the absolute control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1732 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 results were statistically on par with T3 and T7.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
statistically on pare1
Comparator
T3 and T7 treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“These results were statistically on par with the T3 and T7 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1803 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 seed yield was on par with T3 in pooled analysis.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
T3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“the seed yield was found at par with T3 in the pooled analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–1871 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the T5 nutrient combination for enhancing mungbean yield in South Eastern Rajasthan.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
application of 50% N by FYM and 50% N by vermicompost, along with vermiwash spraye1
Setting
South Eastern Rajasthane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mungbean growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hence, the application of 50% N by FYM and 50% N by vermicompost, along with vermiwash spray, is highly effective mungbean yield in the South Eastern Rajasthan for enhancing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–2047 · show in text ↑

application · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 40 positive, 1 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 67 positive, 2 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 94 positive, 4 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

application · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.