Paper · 2024 · Italian Journal of Agrometeorology

Irrigation strategies of sugarcane seedlings from micropropagation and biofactory methods

José Guilherme Victorelli Scanavini; Rubens Duarte Coelho; Timóteo Herculino da Silva Barros; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The sugarcane industry has been suffering from unstable productivity on commercial fields. The major factors causing this problem are mechanized harvesting damage to cane clumps in the field and the slow process of releasing and adopting new sugarcane cultivars. By utilizing new micropropagation processes involving the extraction of apical meristem from new cultivars and biofactory methods for multiplying the material, it is possible to produce an extraordinary number of sugarcane seedlings to provide nurseries rapidly with new cultivars for planting on commercial fields. The goal of this study was to evaluate several irrigation strategies (IS) to determine the best one for supplying the biofactory sugarcane seedlings water requirements, under conditions of different volumes of substrate (VS): 56, 73, 93 and 125 cm³. The irrigation management experiment comprised eight IS based on different periods of accumulated reference evapotranspiration (ETo). We found that the irrigation application must occur at intervals below 30 mm of accumulated ETo. IS1 (maintenance of soil moisture at field capacity) results in a larger number of tillers, longer extension of the primary stalks, and enhanced dry matter (DM) yield independent of VS. The VS factor accounted for statistical differences in sugarcane survival rate and morphological characteristics, but only for low initial soil moisture conditions. The intermediate VS of 73 cm3 was the best option for plants to thrive in the field; larger VS (93 and 125 cm3) produced young plants with many leaves, which transpire a lot in the field, increasing the chances of early death under water stress after planting; the smaller VS (56 cm3) resulted in young plants with small root systems and minimal water reservoirs, resulting in lower survival under drought conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation should be applied at accumulated reference evapotranspiration intervals below 30 mm.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
irrigation application must occur at intervals below 30 mm of accumulated EToe0
Value
30 mme0

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation application must occur at intervals below 30 mm of accumulated ETo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field capacity irrigation increased tiller number and primary stalk extension.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
IS1 (maintenance of soil moisture at field capacity)e0
Outcome
larger number of tillers, longer extension of the primary stalkse0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“IS1 (maintenance of soil moisture at field capacity) results in a larger number of tillers, longer extension of the primary stalks, and enhanced dry matter (DM) yield independent of VS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field capacity irrigation enhanced dry matter yield regardless of substrate volume.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
IS1 (maintenance of soil moisture at field capacity)e0
Outcome
dry matter (DM) yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
independent of VSe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“IS1 (maintenance of soil moisture at field capacity) results in a larger number of tillers, longer extension of the primary stalks, and enhanced dry matter (DM) yield independent of VS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–34 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrate volume affected survival and morphology only under low initial soil moisture.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
VS factore0
Outcome
survival rate and morphological characteristicse0
Qualifier
only for low initial soil moisture conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The VS factor accounted for statistical differences in sugarcane survival rate and morphological characteristics, but only for low initial soil moisture conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1409 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermediate substrate volume of 73 cm3 was best for field establishment.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
best option for plants to thrive in the fielde0
Value
73 cm3e0
Setting
fielde0

Verbatim

e0

“The intermediate VS of 73 cm3 was the best option for plants to thrive in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–34 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger substrate volumes produced leafy seedlings with high transpiration and increased early death risk under water stress.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
larger VS (93 and 125 cm3)e0
Outcome
increasing the chances of early death under water stress after plantinge0
Direction
increasinge0
Setting
fielde0

Verbatim

e0

“larger VS (93 and 125 cm3) produced young plants with many leaves, which transpire a lot in the field, increasing the chances of early death under water stress after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–34 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small substrate volume produced small roots and water reservoirs, lowering drought survival.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
smaller VS (56 cm3)e0
Outcome
survival under drought conditionse0
Direction
lowere0

Verbatim

e0

“the smaller VS (56 cm3) resulted in young plants with small root systems and minimal water reservoirs, resulting in lower survival under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1827 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–34 · show in text ↑

soil water · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

soil water · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.