Paper · 2025 · Remote Sensing

Detection of Invasive Species (Siam Weed) Using Drone-Based Imaging and YOLO Deep Learning Model

Deepak Gautam; Zulfadli Mawardi; Louis Elliott; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study explores the efficacy of drone-acquired RGB images and the YOLO model in detecting the invasive species Siam weed (Chromolaena odorata) in natural environments. Siam weed is a perennial scrambling shrub from tropical and sub-tropical America that is invasive outside its native range, causing substantial environmental and economic impacts across Asia, Africa, and Oceania. First detected in Australia in northern Queensland in 1994 and later in the Northern Territory in 2019, there is an urgent need to determine the extent of its incursion across vast, rugged areas of both jurisdictions and a need for distribution mapping at a catchment scale. This study tests drone-based RGB imaging to train a deep learning model that contributes to the goal of surveying non-native vegetation at a catchment scale. We specifically examined the effects of input training images, solar illumination, and model complexity on the model’s detection performance and investigated the sources of false positives. Drone-based RGB images were acquired from four sites in the Townsville region of Queensland to train and test a deep learning model (YOLOv5). Validation was performed through expert visual interpretation of the detection results in image tiles. The YOLOv5 model demonstrated over 0.85 in its F1-Score, which improved to over 0.95 with improved exposure to the images. A reliable detection model was found to be sufficiently trained with approximately 1000 image tiles, with additional images offering marginal improvement. Increased model complexity did not notably enhance model performance, indicating that a smaller model was adequate. False positives often originated from foliage and bark under high solar illumination, and low exposure images reduced these errors considerably. The study demonstrates the feasibility of using YOLO models to detect invasive species in natural landscapes, providing a safe alternative to the current method involving human spotters in helicopters. Future research will focus on developing tools to merge duplicates, gather georeference data, and report detections from large image datasets more efficiently, providing valuable insights for practical applications in environmental management at the catchment scale.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YOLOv5 achieved an F1 score above 0.85 for Siam weed detection.

Taxon
Siam Weedt0
Outcome
F1-Scoree0
Value
over 0.85e0

Verbatim

e0

“The YOLOv5 model demonstrated over 0.85 in its F1-Score”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“Siam Weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved image exposure raised the detection F1 score above 0.95.

Taxon
Siam Weedt0
Treatment
improved exposure to the imagese0
Outcome
improvede0
Value
over 0.95e0

Verbatim

e0

“which improved to over 0.95 with improved exposure to the images”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Siam Weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Approximately 1000 image tiles trained a reliable detection model; additional tiles gave marginal improvement.

Taxon
Siam Weedt0
Outcome
reliable detection modele0
Value
approximately 1000 image tilese0
Qualifier
additional images offering marginal improvemente0

Verbatim

e0

“A reliable detection model was found to be sufficiently trained with approximately 1000 image tiles, with additional images offering marginal improvement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“Siam Weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater model complexity did not notably improve detection performance.

Taxon
Siam Weedt0
Outcome
model performancee0
Direction
did not notably enhancee0
Comparator
Increased model complexitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Increased model complexity did not notably enhance model performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Siam Weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage and bark under high solar illumination often caused false positives.

Taxon
Siam Weedt0
Outcome
False positivese0
Qualifier
high solar illuminatione0
Comparator
foliage and barke0

Verbatim

e0

“False positives often originated from foliage and bark under high solar illumination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Siam Weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low exposure images considerably reduced false positives.

Taxon
Siam Weedt0
Outcome
these errorse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
low exposure imagese0

Verbatim

e0

“low exposure images reduced these errors considerably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Siam Weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑