Paper · 2025 · Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

Stripe rust of winter wheat in western Canada mitigated with spring- but not fall-applied foliar fungicide

Keiko Nabetani; Juan Lobo; Ken Coles; et al.

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Winter wheat production in Canada is approximately 5% of all the wheat seeded in Canada; however, it has important economic and agronomic benefits for growers. Stripe rust of wheat, caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici Eriks. occurs across western Canada in many years; as a result, it is prudent to evaluate strategies to control stripe rust in winter wheat. The objective of this project was to evaluate the effects of fall and spring fungicide application (metconazole and pyraclostrobin) on stripe rust, as well as leaf spot severity, and impact on yield and quality of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The effect of fungicide application in the fall, in the spring, or both, on four winter wheat cultivars varying in resistance to these diseases was evaluated at 11 site-years in Alberta and Saskatchewan for four growing seasons from 2013 to 2017. Stripe rust severity on the susceptible cultivars, ‘AC Bellatrix’ and ‘CDC Osprey’, and leaf spot severity on these cultivars and ‘Radiant’, was reduced by single spring or dual (fall and spring) applications, but not by fall application alone when disease severity was high. Single spring and dual fungicide applications to ‘AC Bellatrix’ maintained yield potential by 16.9–229.5% compared to the unsprayed treatment. Grain quality was also maintained by the same treatments at some site-years. During the study, virulence of the natural Pst population on ‘Radiant’ with the Yr10 resistance gene was differentially expressed among sites and therefore yield response to fungicide varied. The stripe rust resistant cultivar ‘Moats’ did not benefit from fungicide application at any timing. Single fall fungicide application had no effect on disease severity of any of the cultivars at any site-years, although it had minor effects on yield or grain quality of ‘AC Bellatrix’ at a few site-years. Multiple fungicide applications, in fall and again in spring, did not offer additional benefits to a single spring application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring or dual fungicide application reduced Stripe rust severity in ‘AC Bellatrix’ when disease severity was high.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘AC Bellatrix’e0
Treatment
single spring or dual (fall and spring) applicationse0
Outcome
Stripe rust severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
when disease severity was highe0
Comparator
fall application alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stripe rust severity on the susceptible cultivars, ‘AC Bellatrix’ and ‘CDC Osprey’, and leaf spot severity on these cultivars and ‘Radiant’, was reduced by single spring or dual (fall and spring) applications, but not by fall application alone when disease severity was high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring or dual fungicide application reduced Stripe rust severity in ‘CDC Osprey’ when disease severity was high.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘CDC Osprey’e0
Treatment
single spring or dual (fall and spring) applicationse0
Outcome
Stripe rust severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
when disease severity was highe0
Comparator
fall application alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stripe rust severity on the susceptible cultivars, ‘AC Bellatrix’ and ‘CDC Osprey’, and leaf spot severity on these cultivars and ‘Radiant’, was reduced by single spring or dual (fall and spring) applications, but not by fall application alone when disease severity was high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring or dual fungicide application reduced leaf spot severity in ‘AC Bellatrix’ when disease severity was high.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘AC Bellatrix’e0
Treatment
single spring or dual (fall and spring) applicationse0
Outcome
leaf spot severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
when disease severity was highe0
Comparator
fall application alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stripe rust severity on the susceptible cultivars, ‘AC Bellatrix’ and ‘CDC Osprey’, and leaf spot severity on these cultivars and ‘Radiant’, was reduced by single spring or dual (fall and spring) applications, but not by fall application alone when disease severity was high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring or dual fungicide application reduced leaf spot severity in ‘CDC Osprey’ when disease severity was high.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘CDC Osprey’e0
Treatment
single spring or dual (fall and spring) applicationse0
Outcome
leaf spot severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
when disease severity was highe0
Comparator
fall application alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stripe rust severity on the susceptible cultivars, ‘AC Bellatrix’ and ‘CDC Osprey’, and leaf spot severity on these cultivars and ‘Radiant’, was reduced by single spring or dual (fall and spring) applications, but not by fall application alone when disease severity was high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring or dual fungicide application reduced leaf spot severity in ‘Radiant’ when disease severity was high.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘Radiant’e0
Treatment
single spring or dual (fall and spring) applicationse0
Outcome
leaf spot severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
when disease severity was highe0
Comparator
fall application alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stripe rust severity on the susceptible cultivars, ‘AC Bellatrix’ and ‘CDC Osprey’, and leaf spot severity on these cultivars and ‘Radiant’, was reduced by single spring or dual (fall and spring) applications, but not by fall application alone when disease severity was high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring and dual fungicide application maintained AC Bellatrix yield potential by 16.9–229.5% versus unsprayed treatment.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘AC Bellatrix’e1
Treatment
Single spring and dual fungicide applicationse1
Outcome
yield potentiale1
Direction
maintainede1
Value
16.9–229.5%e1
Comparator
unsprayed treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“Single spring and dual fungicide applications to ‘AC Bellatrix’ maintained yield potential by 16.9–229.5% compared to the unsprayed treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain quality was maintained by spring and dual fungicide applications at some site-years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘AC Bellatrix’e1
Treatment
Single spring and dual fungicide applicationse1
Outcome
Grain qualitye2
Direction
maintainede2
Qualifier
at some site-yearse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“Single spring and dual fungicide applications to ‘AC Bellatrix’ maintained yield potential by 16.9–229.5% compared to the unsprayed treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1285 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain quality was also maintained by the same treatments at some site-years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1362 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pst virulence on Radiant carrying Yr10 differed among sites.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘Radiant’e3
Interactor
Pste3pathogen
Gene
Yr10e3
Outcome
virulence of the natural Pst populatione3
Direction
differentially expressede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e3

“virulence of the natural Pst population on ‘Radiant’ with the Yr10 resistance gene was differentially expressed among sites and therefore yield response to fungicide varied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1554 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiant yield response to fungicide varied among sites.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘Radiant’e3
Interactor
Pste3pathogen
Gene
Yr10e3
Outcome
yield response to fungicidee3
Direction
variede3
Setting
among sitese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e3

“virulence of the natural Pst population on ‘Radiant’ with the Yr10 resistance gene was differentially expressed among sites and therefore yield response to fungicide varied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moats did not benefit from fungicide application at any timing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘Moats’e4
Treatment
fungicide application at any timinge4
Outcome
benefite4
Direction
did not benefite4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e4

“The stripe rust resistant cultivar ‘Moats’ did not benefit from fungicide application at any timing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall fungicide application had no effect on disease severity across cultivars and site-years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Single fall fungicide applicatione5
Outcome
disease severitye5
Direction
no effecte5
Qualifier
any of the cultivars at any site-yearse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e5

“Single fall fungicide application had no effect on disease severity of any of the cultivars at any site-years, although it had minor effects on yield or grain quality of ‘AC Bellatrix’ at a few site-years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall fungicide had minor effects on yield of AC Bellatrix at a few site-years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘AC Bellatrix’e5
Treatment
Single fall fungicide applicatione5
Outcome
yielde5
Qualifier
at a few site-yearse5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e5

“Single fall fungicide application had no effect on disease severity of any of the cultivars at any site-years, although it had minor effects on yield or grain quality of ‘AC Bellatrix’ at a few site-years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall fungicide had minor effects on grain quality of AC Bellatrix at a few site-years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
‘AC Bellatrix’e5
Treatment
Single fall fungicide applicatione5
Outcome
grain qualitye5
Qualifier
at a few site-yearse5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e5

“Single fall fungicide application had no effect on disease severity of any of the cultivars at any site-years, although it had minor effects on yield or grain quality of ‘AC Bellatrix’ at a few site-years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual fungicide application offered no additional benefit over spring alone.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Multiple fungicide applications, in fall and again in springe6
Outcome
additional benefitse6
Direction
did not offere6
Comparator
single spring applicatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–27 · show in text ↑
e6

“Multiple fungicide applications, in fall and again in spring, did not offer additional benefits to a single spring application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–1989 · show in text ↑

fungicide · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 135 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.