Paper · 2025 · Asian Journal of Plant and Soil Sciences

Analysis of Impacts of Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance

Nenge, A. S.; Ibrahim, N.; Adaikwu, A. O.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons to assess the impact of tillage practices and integrated nutrients management systems on soil physical properties and grain yield of maize in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. Treatments were made of factorial combination of three (3) tillage practices (No Tillage (NT),Minimum tillage (MT) and 30cm Raised seed bed (RSB) and ten (10) levels of integrated nutrients management systems (No application,100 Kg NPK/ha,200 Kg NPK/ha, 300 Kg NPK/ha,100 Kg NKP + 5 t/ha PM, 100 Kg NPK + 5 t/ha CD, 200 Kg NPK + 5 t/ha CD,200 Kg + 5 t/ha PM, 10 t/ha PM and )10 t/ha CD) resulting in total of thirty (30) treatment combinations. The treatment combinations were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated three times. The tillage practices constituted the main plots while the nutrients levels were assign to the sub-plots. Three (3) composite auger soil samples were collected at 0 - 15 cm depth before planting for physico - chemical properties analysis. Ninety (90) undisturbed soil samples were also taken at 0-15 cm each in 2018 and 2019 across the experimental plots using core sampler to assess soil physical properties such as bulk density, surface soil porosity, hydraulic conductivity and soil moisture content. The maize variety Oba 2 Hybrid was planted at a spacing of 0.25 m x 0.75 m. Grain yield (t/ha) was taken at harvest to assess the effect of tillage practices and integrated nutrients management systems on maize performance. The data collected on soil physical properties and grain yield of maize were analyzed using ANOVA test based on randomized complete block design (RCBD). Results show that the soil pH of the study area was slightly acidic, low nutrients status, high bulk density (1.72 Mg/m3), low surface soil porosity (35 %,) low hydraulic conductivity in the surface horizon with sandy loam in texture. Raised seed bed tillage practice significantly (p<0.05) improved soil physical properties, and grain yields of maize in the two cropping seasons. Integrated nutrients management systems show significant (p<0.05) improvement on soil physical properties and maize performance in the two cropping seasons. Improved values of soil physical properties grain yields of maize were obtained at 200 kg/ha NPK + 5 t/ha poultry manure amendments plots follow by other plots amended with combined organic and inorganic manures relative to the control and other plots containing either single application of organic or inorganic manure. Combined use of raised seed bed + 200 kg/ha NPK + 5 t/ha poultry manure significantly (p<0.05) improved the physical properties of soil and grain yield of maize relative to other treatment combinations both in 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons. Use of raised seed bed x 200 kg/ha NPK + 5 t/ha poultry manure is recommended for sustainable maize production in the study area. Integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers is hereby, recommended for sustainable maize production in makurdi, Southern guinea Savanna Zone of Nigeria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised seed bed tillage significantly improved grain yield of maize in both seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Raised seed bed tillage practicee1
Outcome
grain yields of maizee1
Direction
improvede1
Setting
Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeriae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiments were carried out during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons to assess the impact of tillage practices and integrated nutrients management systems on soil physical properties and grain yield of maize in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–248 · show in text ↑
e1

“Raised seed bed tillage practice significantly (p<0.05) improved soil physical properties, and grain yields of maize in the two cropping seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–2069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised seed bed tillage significantly improved soil physical properties in both seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Raised seed bed tillage practicee1
Outcome
soil physical propertiese1
Direction
improvede1
Setting
Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeriae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiments were carried out during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons to assess the impact of tillage practices and integrated nutrients management systems on soil physical properties and grain yield of maize in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–248 · show in text ↑
e1

“Raised seed bed tillage practice significantly (p<0.05) improved soil physical properties, and grain yields of maize in the two cropping seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–2069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly improved soil physical properties and maize performance in both seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Integrated nutrients management systemse2
Outcome
soil physical properties and maize performancee2
Direction
improvemente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“Integrated nutrients management systems show significant (p<0.05) improvement on soil physical properties and maize performance in the two cropping seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

200 kg/ha NPK plus 5 t/ha poultry manure improved soil physical properties and maize grain yield relative to the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
200 kg/ha NPK + 5 t/ha poultry manure amendmentse3
Outcome
soil physical properties grain yields of maizee3
Direction
Improvede3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“Improved values of soil physical properties grain yields of maize were obtained at 200 kg/ha NPK + 5 t/ha poultry manure amendments plots follow by other plots amended with combined organic and inorganic manures relative to the control and other plots containing either single application of organic or inorganic manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2228–2547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised seed bed with 200 kg/ha NPK plus 5 t/ha poultry manure significantly improved soil physical properties and grain yield relative to other combinations in both seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
raised seed bed + 200 kg/ha NPK + 5 t/ha poultry manuree4
Outcome
physical properties of soil and grain yield of maizee4
Direction
improvede4
Comparator
other treatment combinationse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“Combined use of raised seed bed + 200 kg/ha NPK + 5 t/ha poultry manure significantly (p<0.05) improved the physical properties of soil and grain yield of maize relative to other treatment combinations both in 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2549–2789 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Raised seed bed with 200 kg/ha NPK plus 5 t/ha poultry manure is recommended for sustainable maize production.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse5
Treatment
raised seed bed x 200 kg/ha NPK + 5 t/ha poultry manuree5
Outcome
sustainable maize productione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e5

“Use of raised seed bed x 200 kg/ha NPK + 5 t/ha poultry manure is recommended for sustainable maize production in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2791–2919 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers is recommended for sustainable maize production.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse6
Treatment
Integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizerse6
Outcome
sustainable maize productione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e6

“Integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers is hereby, recommended for sustainable maize production in makurdi, Southern guinea Savanna Zone of Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2921–3080 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk density of the study soil was high, 1.72 Mg/m3.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
bulk densitye7
Value
1.72 Mg/m3e7
Qualifier
highe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e7

“Results show that the soil pH of the study area was slightly acidic, low nutrients status, high bulk density (1.72 Mg/m3), low surface soil porosity (35 %,) low hydraulic conductivity in the surface horizon with sandy loam in texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface soil porosity of the study soil was low, 35%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
surface soil porositye7
Value
35 %e7
Qualifier
lowe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e7

“Results show that the soil pH of the study area was slightly acidic, low nutrients status, high bulk density (1.72 Mg/m3), low surface soil porosity (35 %,) low hydraulic conductivity in the surface horizon with sandy loam in texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH of the study area was slightly acidic.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
soil pHe7
Qualifier
slightly acidice7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e7

“Results show that the soil pH of the study area was slightly acidic, low nutrients status, high bulk density (1.72 Mg/m3), low surface soil porosity (35 %,) low hydraulic conductivity in the surface horizon with sandy loam in texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface soil hydraulic conductivity of the study soil was low.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
hydraulic conductivitye7
Qualifier
lowe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e7

“Results show that the soil pH of the study area was slightly acidic, low nutrients status, high bulk density (1.72 Mg/m3), low surface soil porosity (35 %,) low hydraulic conductivity in the surface horizon with sandy loam in texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study soil had a sandy loam texture.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
texturee7
Value
sandy loame7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e7

“Results show that the soil pH of the study area was slightly acidic, low nutrients status, high bulk density (1.72 Mg/m3), low surface soil porosity (35 %,) low hydraulic conductivity in the surface horizon with sandy loam in texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study soil had low nutrient status.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
nutrients statuse7
Qualifier
lowe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tillage Practices for Integrated Nutrients Management Systems on Maize performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–105 · show in text ↑
e7

“Results show that the soil pH of the study area was slightly acidic, low nutrients status, high bulk density (1.72 Mg/m3), low surface soil porosity (35 %,) low hydraulic conductivity in the surface horizon with sandy loam in texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1923 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

other · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 221 positive, 32 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

249 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.