Paper · 2025 · Food Chemistry X

Development and application of an efficient, accurate, and environmentally friendly liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of five Alternaria toxins in wheat

Huiyuan Lang; Zengwang Guo; Yu Wu; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The contamination of Alternaria toxins poses a potential risk to human health. This study developed a rapid, efficient, and environmentally friendly method for the simultaneous determination of five types of Alternaria toxins in wheat using high-precision and stable isotope liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The comparison between dilution method and solid-phase extraction method shows that the former achieves satisfactory results with a simple and convenient sample purification method. The quantitative limit range is 0.88 to 1.68 μg/kg. The recoveries are between 81.40 % and 102.68 %, with RSD less than 11.95 %. The method was used to analyze 60 samples from the main wheat producing areas in China. The results showed that Tenuzonic acid had the highest detection rate (100 %), followed by Tentoxin (95 %), Alternariol (66.67 %), and Alternariol monomethyl ether (53.33 %). There is a certain pollution risk that needs to be taken seriously and monitoring should be strengthened. • A dilution purification method developed for Alternaria toxins determination. • Its features is high throughput, low solvent/timeconsumption, and eco-friendly. • The method was applied to 60 wheat samples from chinese major production regions in 2023. • TeA with a high occurrence in analyzed wheat samples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dilution purification method gave satisfactory results compared with solid-phase extraction.

Outcome
satisfactory resultse0
Comparator
solid-phase extraction methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alternaria toxins in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–194 · show in text ↑
e0

“The comparison between dilution method and solid-phase extraction method shows that the former achieves satisfactory results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–447 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The quantitative limit of the method ranges from 0.88 to 1.68 μg/kg.

Outcome
quantitative limite1
Value
0.88 to 1.68 μg/kge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alternaria toxins in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–194 · show in text ↑
e1

“The quantitative limit range is 0.88 to 1.68 μg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–555 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recoveries of the method were between 81.40 % and 102.68 %.

Outcome
recoveriese2
Value
81.40 % and 102.68 %e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alternaria toxins in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–194 · show in text ↑
e2

“The recoveries are between 81.40 % and 102.68 %, with RSD less than 11.95 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–632 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative standard deviation of the method was less than 11.95 %.

Outcome
RSDe2
Value
less than 11.95 %e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alternaria toxins in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–194 · show in text ↑
e2

“The recoveries are between 81.40 % and 102.68 %, with RSD less than 11.95 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–632 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tenuazonic acid had a detection rate of 100% in the 60 wheat samples from China.

Compound
Tenuzonic acide4
Outcome
detection ratee4
Value
100 %e4
Setting
Chinae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alternaria toxins in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–194 · show in text ↑
e3

“The method was used to analyze 60 samples from the main wheat producing areas in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–720 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tenuzonic acid had the highest detection rate (100 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–799 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tentoxin had a detection rate of 95% in the 60 wheat samples from China.

Compound
Tentoxine5
Outcome
detection ratee4
Value
95 %e5
Setting
Chinae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alternaria toxins in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–194 · show in text ↑
e3

“The method was used to analyze 60 samples from the main wheat producing areas in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–720 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tenuzonic acid had the highest detection rate (100 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–799 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by Tentoxin (95 %), Alternariol (66.67 %), and Alternariol monomethyl ether (53.33 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–895 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternariol had a detection rate of 66.67% in the 60 wheat samples from China.

Compound
Alternariole5
Outcome
detection ratee4
Value
66.67 %e5
Setting
Chinae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alternaria toxins in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–194 · show in text ↑
e3

“The method was used to analyze 60 samples from the main wheat producing areas in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–720 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tenuzonic acid had the highest detection rate (100 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–799 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by Tentoxin (95 %), Alternariol (66.67 %), and Alternariol monomethyl ether (53.33 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–895 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternariol monomethyl ether had a detection rate of 53.33% in the 60 wheat samples from China.

Compound
Alternariol monomethyl ethere5
Outcome
detection ratee4
Value
53.33 %e5
Setting
Chinae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alternaria toxins in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–194 · show in text ↑
e3

“The method was used to analyze 60 samples from the main wheat producing areas in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–720 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tenuzonic acid had the highest detection rate (100 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–799 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by Tentoxin (95 %), Alternariol (66.67 %), and Alternariol monomethyl ether (53.33 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–895 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Monitoring of Alternaria toxins in wheat should be strengthened because of the pollution risk.

Outcome
monitoringe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alternaria toxins in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–194 · show in text ↑
e6

“There is a certain pollution risk that needs to be taken seriously and monitoring should be strengthened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1001 · show in text ↑