Paper · 2025 · Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences

Effect of the Utilization of The Bioinsecticide Spinosad on Certain Piercing Sucking Insect Pests Attacking Okra Plants and Effect on Aphidius colemani Viereck, in Sohag Governorate

Wail A. El-Hadary; Mohamed A.M. Ali

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Okra, Abelmoschus esculentus L. (Malvaceae) is one of the most important vegetable and cash crop in Egypt. The present study was conducted to determine the effect of Spinosad on the population trends of Aphis gossypii, Bemisia tabaci and Empoasca discipiens infesting okra in relation to some weather factors during 2022 and 2023 seasons at Sohag Governorate. Data indicated that Spinosad treatment reduced the number of the three studied pests and affected on their fluctuation trends in both seasons. Spinosad reduced A. gossypii, B. tabaci and E. discipiens by 67.53%, 62.80% and 50.37%, respectively, in 2022 season, and 64.66%, 66.99% and 51.31%, respectively, in 2023 season. For the parasitism of A. gossypii by Aphidius colemani, it is clear that the parasitism percentage decreased from 12.35% and 8.87% in control to 9.56% and 7.01% in Spinosad with reduction percentage of 22.64% and 21.00% in the two seasons, respectively. In case of weather factors, results showed that the temperature and relative humidity varied in their effect depending on factor, insect and season. However, it is clear that parasitoid showed highly positive significant effect on A. gossypii activity in both treated and untreated okra in the two seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad reduced A. gossypii by 67.53% in 2022.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Interactor
A. gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
A. gossypiie0
Direction
reducede0
Value
67.53%e0
Qualifier
2022 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad reduced A. gossypii, B. tabaci and E. discipiens by 67.53%, 62.80% and 50.37%, respectively, in 2022 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad reduced B. tabaci by 62.80% in 2022.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Interactor
B. tabaciBemisia tabacie0pest
Outcome
B. tabacie0
Direction
reducede0
Value
62.80%e0
Qualifier
2022 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad reduced A. gossypii, B. tabaci and E. discipiens by 67.53%, 62.80% and 50.37%, respectively, in 2022 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad reduced E. discipiens by 50.37% in 2022.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Interactor
E. discipiense0pest
Outcome
E. discipiense0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50.37%e0
Qualifier
2022 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad reduced A. gossypii, B. tabaci and E. discipiens by 67.53%, 62.80% and 50.37%, respectively, in 2022 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad reduced A. gossypii by 64.66% in 2023.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Interactor
A. gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
A. gossypiie0
Direction
reducede0
Value
64.66%e0
Qualifier
2023 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad reduced A. gossypii, B. tabaci and E. discipiens by 67.53%, 62.80% and 50.37%, respectively, in 2022 season, and 64.66%, 66.99% and 51.31%, respectively, in 2023 season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad reduced B. tabaci by 66.99% in 2023.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Interactor
B. tabaciBemisia tabacie0pest
Outcome
B. tabacie0
Direction
reducede0
Value
66.99%e0
Qualifier
2023 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad reduced A. gossypii, B. tabaci and E. discipiens by 67.53%, 62.80% and 50.37%, respectively, in 2022 season, and 64.66%, 66.99% and 51.31%, respectively, in 2023 season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad reduced E. discipiens by 51.31% in 2023.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Interactor
E. discipiense0pest
Outcome
E. discipiense0
Direction
reducede0
Value
51.31%e0
Qualifier
2023 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad reduced A. gossypii, B. tabaci and E. discipiens by 67.53%, 62.80% and 50.37%, respectively, in 2022 season, and 64.66%, 66.99% and 51.31%, respectively, in 2023 season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad decreased parasitism of A. gossypii in both seasons.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Interactor
A. gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Second interactor
Aphidius colemaniAphidius colemanie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitism percentagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
22.64% and 21.00%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphidius colemani
Aphidius colemani · Second interactorLaura Sorrensen at Pxhere · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the parasitism of A. gossypii by Aphidius colemani, it is clear that the parasitism percentage decreased from 12.35% and 8.87% in control to 9.56% and 7.01% in Spinosad with reduction percentage of 22.64% and 21.00% in the two seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weather factor effects varied by factor, insect and season.

Outcome
effecte0
Qualifier
depending on factor, insect and seasone0
Setting
Sohag Governoratet0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the temperature and relative humidity varied in their effect depending on factor, insect and season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra Plants and Effect on Aphidius colemani Viereck, in Sohag Governorate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–181 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The parasitoid had a highly positive significant effect on A. gossypii activity.

Interactor
A. gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Second interactor
parasitoide0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
A. gossypii activitye0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“parasitoid showed highly positive significant effect on A. gossypii activity in both treated and untreated okra in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1242 · show in text ↑

spinosad · Aphis gossypii · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.