Abstract
Mung bean, one of the most important crop in terms of food and nutritional security, is often neglected in terms of soil nutrient management in cereal based cropping system, where biological properties of soil is ignored and application of chemical fertilizers is at large. Hence this study was conducted at Agronomy Farm, Far Western University, Kailali, Nepal during April-June 2022 to evaluate varieties under different biofertilizers and their combination on yield and yield attributing traits of mung bean. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The treatment consisted of 3 varieties of mung bean viz. Pratigya, Kalyan and SML-668 and 6 levels of biofertilizers viz. Rhizobium (R), Rhizobium+ Trichoderma (RT), Rhizobium+Pseudomonas (RP), Rhizobium+Trichoderma+Pseudomonas (RTP), Trichoderma+Pseudomonas (TP) and control. Growth and yield of mung bean were significantly influenced by variety, biofertilizers and their combinations but no significant interaction effects were observed. SML-668 performed better over Pratigya and Kalyan respectively in root parameters, leaf area index, yield attributing traits and yield generating 1.81 t/ha grain yield. Similarly, the combination of biofertilizers (RTP) generated significantly highest grain yield followed by RP and RT. The grain yield obtained with application of Rhizobium (R) was statistically at par with that from TP. The control plot yielded significantly lesser grain yield which was 7.6% lesser than rhizobium (R). So, the use of SML-668 variety and application of rhizobium either alone or in combination is recommended for better yield of mung bean at similar condition under rice-wheat cropping system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Variety significantly affected mung bean growth and yield.
- Taxon
- mung bean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae0 - Material
- varietye0
- Outcome
- Growth and yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Growth and yield of mung bean were significantly influenced by variety, biofertilizers and their combinations but no significant interaction effects were observed.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizers significantly affected mung bean growth and yield.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- biofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- Growth and yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth and yield of mung bean were significantly influenced by variety, biofertilizers and their combinations but no significant interaction effects were observed.”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety and biofertilizer interaction effects were not significant.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- Varietiest0
- Outcome
- interaction effectse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no significant interaction effects were observed.”
t0“Varieties and Biofertilizers on Growth and Yield of Mung Bean”
Claim · model-written summary
SML-668 exceeded Pratigya and Kalyan in root parameters, leaf area index, and yield attributes.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- SML-668e0
- Outcome
- root parameters, leaf area index, yield attributing traitse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- Pratigya and Kalyane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SML-668 performed better over Pratigya and Kalyan respectively in root parameters, leaf area index, yield attributing traits and yield generating 1.81 t/ha grain yield.”
t0“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
SML-668 grain yield was 1.81 t/ha and exceeded Pratigya and Kalyan.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- SML-668e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 1.81 t/hae0
- Comparator
- Pratigya and Kalyane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SML-668 performed better over Pratigya and Kalyan respectively in root parameters, leaf area index, yield attributing traits and yield generating 1.81 t/ha grain yield.”
t0“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
RTP generated the significantly highest grain yield among fertilizer combinations.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- RTPe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- RP and RTe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the combination of biofertilizers (RTP) generated significantly highest grain yield followed by RP and RT.”
t0“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
RP grain yield ranked below RTP and above RT.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- RPe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Comparator
- RTe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the combination of biofertilizers (RTP) generated significantly highest grain yield followed by RP and RT.”
t0“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium alone and TP produced statistically comparable grain yields.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium (R)e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- TPe0
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain yield obtained with application of Rhizobium (R) was statistically at par with that from TP.”
t0“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Control yield was significantly 7.6% lower than Rhizobium-treated yield.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- rhizobium (R)e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- lessere0
- Value
- 7.6%e0
- Comparator
- control plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The control plot yielded significantly lesser grain yield which was 7.6% lesser than rhizobium (R).”
t0“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend SML-668 and Rhizobium alone or in combination for mung bean yield under similar rice-wheat systems.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Material
- SML-668e0
- Outcome
- use of SML-668 variety and application of rhizobium either alone or in combinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of SML-668 variety and application of rhizobium either alone or in combination is recommended for better yield of mung bean at similar condition under rice-wheat cropping system.”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
119 papers more in this group
See all 123 papers →Pseudomonas · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Trichoderma · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.