Paper · 2025 · Tropical Grasslands - Forrajes Tropicales

Evaluation of herbaceous legumes for crop-livestock systems in eastern Indonesia

Kendrick Cox; Jacob Nulik; Neal Dalgliesh; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The sale of cattle presents a significant opportunity to improve livelihoods for smallholder farmers in eastern Indonesia. An opportunity was identified to grow herbaceous forage legumes either in rotation with, or sown within, staple grain crops (maize, rice) to use surplus soil moisture to produce a feed bank for (mostly penned) cattle and potentially increase nitrogen supply to the grain crops. A series of experiments was conducted on Vertisol, Alfisol and Inceptisol soils in lowland and upland districts of eastern Indonesia to identify legumes from 18 taxa suitable for integrated crop-forage systems. Clitoria ternatea and Centrosema pascuorum were found to have best potential for these systems as they established reliably using local methods, consistently ranked highly for herbage yields 2–4 months after sowing and were relatively easy to harvest. Yields were highest on the Vertisol (greatest number of sites) and Inceptisol soils. Lablab purpureus, Macroptilium bracteatum and Mucuna pruriens also ranked high for yield on Vertisol soils. Clitoria ternatea regrew consistently after cutting and forage removal providing potential for extended forage production as growing conditions allow.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clitoria ternatea was found to have the best potential among the tested herbaceous legumes for integrated crop-forage systems in eastern Indonesia.

Taxon
Clitoria ternateaClitoria ternateae0
Outcome
best potential for these systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Clitoria ternatea
Clitoria ternatea · TaxonSuyash.dwivedi · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clitoria ternatea and Centrosema pascuorum were found to have best potential for these systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–706 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Centrosema pascuorum was found to have the best potential among the tested herbaceous legumes for integrated crop-forage systems in eastern Indonesia.

Taxon
Centrosema pascuorumCentrosema pascuorume0
Outcome
best potential for these systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Centrosema pascuorum
Centrosema pascuorum · TaxonBtcpg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clitoria ternatea and Centrosema pascuorum were found to have best potential for these systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–706 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clitoria ternatea consistently ranked highly for herbage yield 2-4 months after sowing.

Taxon
Clitoria ternateaClitoria ternateae0
Outcome
herbage yieldse1
Direction
ranked highlye1
Qualifier
2–4 months after sowinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Clitoria ternatea
Clitoria ternatea · TaxonSuyash.dwivedi · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clitoria ternatea and Centrosema pascuorum were found to have best potential for these systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“consistently ranked highly for herbage yields 2–4 months after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–826 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Centrosema pascuorum consistently ranked highly for herbage yield 2-4 months after sowing.

Taxon
Centrosema pascuorumCentrosema pascuorume0
Outcome
herbage yieldse1
Direction
ranked highlye1
Qualifier
2–4 months after sowinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Centrosema pascuorum
Centrosema pascuorum · TaxonBtcpg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clitoria ternatea and Centrosema pascuorum were found to have best potential for these systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“consistently ranked highly for herbage yields 2–4 months after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–826 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clitoria ternatea regrew consistently after cutting and forage removal, offering potential for extended forage production.

Taxon
Clitoria ternateaClitoria ternateae0
Outcome
regrew consistently after cuttinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Clitoria ternatea
Clitoria ternatea · TaxonSuyash.dwivedi · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clitoria ternatea regrew consistently after cutting and forage removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume yields were highest on the Vertisol and Inceptisol soils.

Taxon
herbaceous legumest0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Vertisol (greatest number of sites) and Inceptisol soilse0

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were highest on the Vertisol (greatest number of sites) and Inceptisol soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“herbaceous legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lablab purpureus also ranked high for yield on Vertisol soils.

Taxon
Lablab purpureusLablab purpureuse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
ranked highe0
Setting
Vertisol soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lablab purpureus
Lablab purpureus · TaxonTaken by Fanghong · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lablab purpureus, Macroptilium bracteatum and Mucuna pruriens also ranked high for yield on Vertisol soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1055 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macroptilium bracteatum also ranked high for yield on Vertisol soils.

Taxon
Macroptilium bracteatumMacroptilium bracteatume0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
ranked highe0
Setting
Vertisol soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Macroptilium bracteatum
Macroptilium bracteatum · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lablab purpureus, Macroptilium bracteatum and Mucuna pruriens also ranked high for yield on Vertisol soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1055 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mucuna pruriens also ranked high for yield on Vertisol soils.

Taxon
Mucuna pruriensMucuna pruriense0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
ranked highe0
Setting
Vertisol soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mucuna pruriens
Mucuna pruriens · TaxonDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lablab purpureus, Macroptilium bracteatum and Mucuna pruriens also ranked high for yield on Vertisol soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1055 · show in text ↑