Paper · 2025 · Rhizosphere

Investigating the influence of antagonistic fungi Polydomus karssenii and Niesslia gamsii on the penetration of Heterodera filipjevi and Pratylenchus thornei in wheat

Osameh Atiya; Samad Ashrafi; Abdelfattah A. Dababat; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant parasitic nematodes (PPNs) significantly impact global wheat production. Strategies for managing PPN include developing tolerance/resistance varieties, crop rotation, and the use of nematicides. However, nematicides are highly toxic and have a non-target effect on the soil biota, emphasizing the need for safer alternatives and innovative approaches. This study investigated the suppressive effect of two nematode egg parasitic fungi, Polydomus karssenii (Ashrafi, Maciá-Vicente & Maier, 2023) and Niesslia gamsii (Ashrafi & Maier, 2017), on the penetration of the cereal cyst nematode (CCN) Heterodera filipjevi (Madzhidov, 1981) and the root lesion nematode (RLN) Pratylenchus thornei (Sher & Allen, 1953) into wheat roots. Two nematode-susceptible wheat cultivars, Bezostaya and Seri, were treated with P. karssenii and N. gamsii . Germinated seeds were dipped in a fungal suspension before being inoculated with the nematode species. Nematode penetration was evaluated at 48 h, 72 h, and 1 week after inoculation using acid fuchsin staining and microscopical examination. The results revealed that both fungal treatments reduced nematode penetration in both cultivars compared to untreated controls, with P. karssenii showing higher overall effectiveness. Polydomus karssenii reduced penetration of H. filipjevi by 91.9% and P. thornei by 85.9%, while N. gamsii reduced penetration of H. filipjevi by 76% and P. thornei by 67.3%. Additionally, fungal treatments delayed nematode penetration, no penetration was observed at 48 h in treated plants, while nematode penetration was observed in untreated plants during the same period. This study underscores the potential of P. karssenii and N. gamsii as sustainable biological agents against nematodes and emphasizes their role in integrated pest management strategies for wheat production. • Polydomus karssenii reduced nematode penetration by just over 90%. • Niesslia gamsii showed a 67-76% reduction in nematode penetration. • Both fungi delayed nematode penetration in wheat roots by 48 h. • First report of a dark septate endophyte ( Polydomus karssenii ) reducing/delaying penetration of plant parasitic nematodes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. karssenii reduced H. filipjevi penetration by 91.9%.

Treatment
Polydomus karsseniie0
Interactor
H. filipjeviHeterodera filipjevie0pathogen
Second interactor
Polydomus karsseniiPolydomus karsseniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
penetration of H. filipjevie0
Direction
reducede0
Value
91.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polydomus karssenii reduced penetration of H. filipjevi by 91.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. karssenii reduced P. thornei penetration by 85.9%.

Treatment
Polydomus karsseniie0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie0pathogen
Second interactor
Polydomus karsseniiPolydomus karsseniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
P. thorneie0
Direction
reducede0
Value
85.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polydomus karssenii reduced penetration of H. filipjevi by 91.9% and P. thornei by 85.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. gamsii reduced H. filipjevi penetration by 76%.

Treatment
N. gamsiie0
Interactor
H. filipjeviHeterodera filipjevie0pathogen
Second interactor
N. gamsiiNiesslia gamsiie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
penetration of H. filipjevie0
Direction
reducede0
Value
76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N. gamsii reduced penetration of H. filipjevi by 76%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. gamsii reduced P. thornei penetration by 67.3%.

Treatment
N. gamsiie0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie0pathogen
Second interactor
N. gamsiiNiesslia gamsiie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
P. thorneie0
Direction
reducede0
Value
67.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N. gamsii reduced penetration of H. filipjevi by 76% and P. thornei by 67.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal treatment delayed wheat-root nematode penetration, with none seen at 48 hours in treated plants.

Treatment
fungal treatmentse0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pathogen
Outcome
nematode penetratione0
Direction
delayede0
Value
48 he0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungal treatments delayed nematode penetration, no penetration was observed at 48 h in treated plants, while nematode penetration was observed in untreated plants during the same period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1641 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–166 · show in text ↑