Paper · 2024 · Interdepartmental Thematic Scientific Collection of Phytosanitary safety

Monitoring of the phytosanitary state of grape plantations in the south of Ukraine in 2022—2024

Yu. Klechkovskyi; N. Mohyliuk; K. Shmatkovska; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Goal. The protection of vineyards is based on monitoring, which provides early detection, assessment of the degree of infection and forecasting of future populations of pests, which increases the chances of avoiding economic losses from them. Phytosanitary monitoring in regulating the intensity of development and spread of phytopathogenic organisms is of undoubted economic and environmental importance. Methods of the work was to study the peculiarities of the spread and development of harmful objects and weeds in the vineyards of the South of Ukraine. The main research methods were: field — to determine the distribution, development and harmfulness of the main harmful objects of vineyards and weeds; laboratory — to study pathogens of grape diseases; visual and mathematical-statistical. The objects of monitoring were grape plantations of different planting dates and varietal assortment. Results. Field surveys in 2022—2024 revealed the spread and development of Plasmopara viticola Berl. et Toni and Uncinula necator Berk. on grape plantations in the South of Ukraine. It was found that the most favorable for Plasmopara viticola Berl. et Toni was the vegetation period of 2024, when a high degree of disease development was observed on the inflorescences and the spread in untreated areas was almost 80%, with the development of the disease 20%. It was determined that during the years of research the conditions were favorable for the manifestation of Uncinula necator Berk., the highest percentage of distribution was observed at the end of the growing season on the clusters and reached 60%, with 30% development. Pheromone monitoring conducted during the study period revealed the dynamics of Lobesia botrana Schiff. population development, the timing and duration of all stages of the pest. Observations showed a different number of males of the first generation of the butterfly per trap. The largest number of males, compared to 2023—2024, was recorded in 2022. It was found that a mixed type of weediness is observed in vineyards, namely, root and rhizome perennials, which are the most widespread and harmful weed species. Conclusions. The results of the research conducted in 2022—2024, taking into account the phytosanitary condition of vineyards in the following years, provide the basis for the development of a system of protective measures for further implementation in the technology of grape growing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plasmopara viticola spread and developed in southern Ukrainian grape plantations during 2022—2024.

Taxon
grapee0
Interactor
Plasmopara viticola Berl. et ToniPlasmopara viticolae0pathogen
Outcome
spread and developmente0
Setting
South of Ukrainee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plasmopara viticola
Plasmopara viticola · InteractorRude · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field surveys in 2022—2024 revealed the spread and development of Plasmopara viticola Berl. et Toni and Uncinula necator Berk. on grape plantations in the South of Ukraine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1080 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncinula necator spread and developed in southern Ukrainian grape plantations during 2022—2024.

Taxon
grapee0
Interactor
Uncinula necator Berk.Erysiphe necatore0pathogen
Outcome
spread and developmente0
Setting
South of Ukrainee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erysiphe necator
Erysiphe necator · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBenjamin Vanegtern · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field surveys in 2022—2024 revealed the spread and development of Plasmopara viticola Berl. et Toni and Uncinula necator Berk. on grape plantations in the South of Ukraine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1080 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In untreated areas in 2024, Plasmopara viticola spread to almost 80%.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
Plasmopara viticola Berl. et ToniPlasmopara viticolae1pathogen
Outcome
spreade0
Value
almost 80%e0
Setting
untreated arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plasmopara viticola
Plasmopara viticola · InteractorRude · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spread in untreated areas was almost 80%, with the development of the disease 20%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“most favorable for Plasmopara viticola Berl. et Toni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1155 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plasmopara viticola disease development reached 20% in untreated areas in 2024.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
Plasmopara viticola Berl. et ToniPlasmopara viticolae1pathogen
Outcome
development of the diseasee0
Value
20%e0
Setting
untreated arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plasmopara viticola
Plasmopara viticola · InteractorRude · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spread in untreated areas was almost 80%, with the development of the disease 20%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“most favorable for Plasmopara viticola Berl. et Toni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1155 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncinula necator distribution reached 60% on clusters late in the season.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
clusterse0
Interactor
Uncinula necator Berk.Erysiphe necatore1pathogen
Outcome
percentage of distributione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
60%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erysiphe necator
Erysiphe necator · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBenjamin Vanegtern · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest percentage of distribution was observed at the end of the growing season on the clusters and reached 60%, with 30% development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“manifestation of Uncinula necator Berk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1488 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncinula necator development reached 30% on clusters late in the season.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
clusterse0
Interactor
Uncinula necator Berk.Erysiphe necatore1pathogen
Outcome
developmente0
Value
30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erysiphe necator
Erysiphe necator · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBenjamin Vanegtern · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest percentage of distribution was observed at the end of the growing season on the clusters and reached 60%, with 30% development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“manifestation of Uncinula necator Berk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1488 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone monitoring revealed Lobesia botrana population dynamics and timing and duration of life stages.

Taxon
Lobesia botrana Schiff.Lobesia botranae0
Outcome
dynamics of Lobesia botrana Schiff. population development, the timing and duration of all stages of the peste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lobesia botrana
Lobesia botrana · Taxongailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pheromone monitoring conducted during the study period revealed the dynamics of Lobesia botrana Schiff. population development, the timing and duration of all stages of the pest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1808 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-generation male Lobesia botrana trap counts varied and were greatest in 2022.

Taxon
Lobesia botrana Schiff.Lobesia botranae1
Outcome
number of malese0
Direction
largeste0
Value
2022e0
Comparator
2023—2024e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lobesia botrana
Lobesia botrana · Taxongailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest number of males, compared to 2023—2024, was recorded in 2022.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1908–1981 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lobesia botrana Schiff. population development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1756 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vineyards showed mixed weediness, with root and rhizome perennials most widespread and harmful.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
root and rhizome perennialse0weed
Outcome
mixed type of weedinesse0
Qualifier
most widespread and harmful weed speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“a mixed type of weediness is observed in vineyards, namely, root and rhizome perennials, which are the most widespread and harmful weed species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2000–2144 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–58 · show in text ↑