Paper · 2025 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Chlorantraniliprole as seed treatments against the black cutworm Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) via residues in cotton ecosystem and the exposure risks to honeybees as measured in pollen

Jiangong Jiang; Rongyu Li; Xinjie Guo; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The black cutworm Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnagel) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) can damage the cotton seedlings and induce destructive yield loss. Seed coating with systemic insecticides is a cost-effective alternative to control A. ipsilon during the early stage of cotton, but the control efficacy and exposure risk to honeybees remain unclear. This study evaluated the control effects of the anthranilic diamide insecticide chlorantraniliprole on A. ipsilon in cotton crops and the corresponding exposure risks to honeybees. Field studies revealed the control efficacy of chlorantraniliprole at 2 or 4 g/kg seed was greater than 75%, which was comparable to its spray control during the seedling development stage. A residual toxicity trial revealed that chlorantraniliprole treatment had a dose-response control effect on A. ipsilon during the 19 days after sowing. The residue levels of chlorantraniliprole in the stem bases and soil were found consistent with the residual toxicity against A. ipsilon. In the cotton flowering period, the highest detection frequency and residue of chlorantraniliprole were found in pollen from the plots treated with 4 g/kg seed. By using 2 independent risk assessment approaches, the exposure risk of chlorantraniliprole seed treatments were evaluated to be acceptable to honeybees. Overall, chlorantraniliprole coated with 2 g/kg seed was an effective alternative for controlling A. ipsilon at the cotton seedling stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole seed treatment at 2 or 4 g/kg seed gave control efficacy greater than 75% against A. ipsilon in cotton in field studies, comparable to spray control during seedling development.

Treatment
chlorantraniliprole at 2 or 4 g/kg seede1
Interactor
A. ipsilonAgrotis ipsilone0pest
Outcome
control efficacye1
Direction
greatere1
Value
75%e1
Comparator
spray controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrotis ipsilon
Agrotis ipsilon · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on A. ipsilon in cotton crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–466 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control efficacy of chlorantraniliprole at 2 or 4 g/kg seed was greater than 75%, which was comparable to its spray control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole treatment had a dose-response control effect on A. ipsilon in cotton during the 19 days after sowing.

Treatment
chlorantraniliprole treatmente1
Interactor
A. ipsilonAgrotis ipsilone1pest
Outcome
dose-response control effecte1
Qualifier
19 days after sowinge1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrotis ipsilon
Agrotis ipsilon · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on A. ipsilon in cotton crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–466 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorantraniliprole treatment had a dose-response control effect on A. ipsilon during the 19 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–858 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole residue levels in cotton stem bases and soil were consistent with the residual toxicity against A. ipsilon.

Organ / stage
stem basese1
Interactor
A. ipsilonAgrotis ipsilone1pest
Outcome
residue levels of chlorantraniliprolee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrotis ipsilon
Agrotis ipsilon · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on A. ipsilon in cotton crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–466 · show in text ↑
e1

“The residue levels of chlorantraniliprole in the stem bases and soil were found consistent with the residual toxicity against A. ipsilon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–996 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the cotton flowering period the highest detection frequency and residue of chlorantraniliprole were found in pollen from plots treated at 4 g/kg seed.

Organ / stage
pollene0
Treatment
4 g/kg seede0
Outcome
highest detection frequency and residue of chlorantraniliprolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the cotton flowering period, the highest detection frequency and residue of chlorantraniliprole were found in pollen from the plots treated with 4 g/kg seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1157 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two independent risk assessment approaches evaluated the exposure risk of chlorantraniliprole seed treatments in cotton to honeybees as acceptable.

Treatment
chlorantraniliprole seed treatmentse1
Interactor
honeybeesApis melliferae1pollinator
Outcome
exposure riske1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Apis mellifera
Apis mellifera · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on A. ipsilon in cotton crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–466 · show in text ↑
e1

“the exposure risk of chlorantraniliprole seed treatments were evaluated to be acceptable to honeybees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1311 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that seed coating with chlorantraniliprole at 2 g/kg seed is an effective alternative for controlling A. ipsilon at the cotton seedling stages.

Treatment
chlorantraniliprole coated with 2 g/kg seede0
Interactor
A. ipsilonAgrotis ipsilone0pest
Outcome
effective alternative for controlling A. ipsilone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrotis ipsilon
Agrotis ipsilon · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorantraniliprole coated with 2 g/kg seed was an effective alternative for controlling A. ipsilon at the cotton seedling stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1451 · show in text ↑