Paper · 2024 · Plant Bulletin

Assessing Potential of Maize Hybrids under Varying Tillage Practices

Muahmmad Umer Hameed; Syed Aftab Wajid; Hassan Munir; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Changing tillage practices can affect soil characteristics and conditions for seed germination along with effecting crop production drastically. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted to find out the effect of different tillage practices on the potential of maize hybrids at Agronomic Research farm, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad during the 2nd week of March 2019. Two hybrids of maize (H1=YH-1898 and H2=DK-9108) were sown under four tillage practices (T0=Zero Tillage, T1=Minimum Tillage, T2=Conventional Tillage and T3=Deep Tillage. Data regarding leaf area index, leaf area duration, total dry matter, crop growth rate, plant height, cob length, yield per cob, 1000-grain weight, number of grain rows per cob, grain yield, cob height and cob girth were recorded using standard procedures. The collected data were analyzed statistically by using Fisher’s analysis of variance technique and honestly significant difference at 5% probability was used to compare the differences among treatments means. Maximum crop productivity was achieved with minimum tillage with DK-9108 hybrid in comparison to other tillage practices. An increase of 11.7% in thousand grain weight, 3.4% increase in cob girth and 17.7% increase in grain yield was observed by changing the hybrid. Whereas 34% yield increment was noticed with deep tillage in comparison to traditional practices providing 34% more profit to the farmers. However, interaction of both hybrid and tillage practices could not increase maize yield significantly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage with DK-9108 produced maximum crop productivity relative to other tillage practices.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
DK-9108e0
Treatment
minimum tillagee0
Outcome
crop productivitye0
Direction
Maximume0
Comparator
other tillage practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum crop productivity was achieved with minimum tillage with DK-9108 hybrid in comparison to other tillage practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Assessing Potential of Maize Hybrids under Varying Tillage Practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing the maize hybrid increased thousand grain weight by 11.7%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
changing the hybride0
Outcome
thousand grain weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase of 11.7% in thousand grain weight, 3.4% increase in cob girth and 17.7% increase in grain yield was observed by changing the hybrid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Assessing Potential of Maize Hybrids under Varying Tillage Practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing the maize hybrid increased cob girth by 3.4%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
changing the hybride0
Outcome
cob girthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase of 11.7% in thousand grain weight, 3.4% increase in cob girth and 17.7% increase in grain yield was observed by changing the hybrid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Assessing Potential of Maize Hybrids under Varying Tillage Practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing the maize hybrid increased grain yield by 17.7%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
changing the hybride0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase of 11.7% in thousand grain weight, 3.4% increase in cob girth and 17.7% increase in grain yield was observed by changing the hybrid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Assessing Potential of Maize Hybrids under Varying Tillage Practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage raised yield 34% relative to traditional practices.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
incremente0
Value
34%e0
Comparator
traditional practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“34% yield increment was noticed with deep tillage in comparison to traditional practices providing 34% more profit to the farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Assessing Potential of Maize Hybrids under Varying Tillage Practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage provided 34% more farmer profit than traditional practices.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
profite0
Direction
moree0
Value
34%e0
Comparator
traditional practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“34% yield increment was noticed with deep tillage in comparison to traditional practices providing 34% more profit to the farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Assessing Potential of Maize Hybrids under Varying Tillage Practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid by tillage interaction did not significantly increase maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
interaction of both hybrid and tillage practicese0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
could not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction of both hybrid and tillage practices could not increase maize yield significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1525 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.