Paper · 2025 · Plants

Effective Use of Novel Auxotrophic Agrobacterium tumefaciens Strains for Transformation and Biocontainment

Lichi Zhong; Huiting Guo; Ling Wu; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Auxotrophic strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens have been developed to address the Agrobacterium overgrowth issue in plant genetic transformation; however, their application remains limited. Here, we generated novel histidine and leucine auxotrophic strains of A. tumefaciens EHA105, namely EHA105hisD− and EHA105leuA−, as well as a dual auxotrophic strain EHA105hisD−leuA−, through gene deletion. The transient expression efficiency and survival rate of these three auxotrophic strains in Nicotiana benthamiana were significantly impaired but could be restored to wild-type EHA105 levels by supplementation with appropriate concentrations of the corresponding amino acids (CAAs). The use of these three auxotrophic strains for the genetic transformation of N. benthamiana resulted in a significant reduction in Agrobacterium overgrowth and achieved transformation efficiency comparable to wild-type EHA105, when appropriate exogenous concentrations of the CAAs were supplied during the co-cultivation stage. Furthermore, through incubation experiments on various plants and soil, it was confirmed that the incidence of surviving cells from these three auxotrophic strains was much lower than that observed for the wild-type EHA105. In summary, this study reports on the characteristics of the novel auxotrophic strains of A. tumefaciens along with the effective use of such auxotrophic A. tumefaciens strains in plant genetic transformation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Histidine-auxotrophic EHA105hisD− was generated by gene deletion.

Taxon
Agrobacterium tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefacienst0
Outcome
EHA105hisD−e0
Comparator
EHA105e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · TaxonClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“generated novel histidine and leucine auxotrophic strains of A. tumefaciens EHA105, namely EHA105hisD− and EHA105leuA−, as well as a dual auxotrophic strain EHA105hisD−leuA−, through gene deletion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agrobacterium tumefaciens Strains for Transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–87 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leucine-auxotrophic EHA105leuA− was generated by gene deletion.

Taxon
Agrobacterium tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefacienst0
Outcome
EHA105leuA−e0
Comparator
EHA105e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · TaxonClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“generated novel histidine and leucine auxotrophic strains of A. tumefaciens EHA105, namely EHA105hisD− and EHA105leuA−, as well as a dual auxotrophic strain EHA105hisD−leuA−, through gene deletion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agrobacterium tumefaciens Strains for Transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–87 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual auxotrophic EHA105hisD−leuA− was generated by gene deletion.

Taxon
Agrobacterium tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefacienst0
Outcome
EHA105hisD−leuA−e0
Comparator
Agrobacterium tumefacienst0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · TaxonClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a dual auxotrophic strain EHA105hisD−leuA−, through gene deletion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agrobacterium tumefaciens Strains for Transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–87 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transient expression efficiency of all three strains in Nicotiana was significantly impaired but restored with amino acids.

Taxon
Nicotiana benthamianaNicotiana benthamianae0
Treatment
supplementation with appropriate concentrations of the corresponding amino acids (CAAs)e0
Outcome
transient expression efficiencye0
Direction
restorede0
Comparator
wild-type EHA105e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana benthamiana
Nicotiana benthamiana · TaxonCharles Andres · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The transient expression efficiency and survival rate of these three auxotrophic strains in Nicotiana benthamiana were significantly impaired but could be restored to wild-type EHA105 levels by supplementation with appropriate concentrations of the corresponding amino acids (CAAs).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–681 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival rate of all three strains in Nicotiana was significantly impaired but restored with amino acids.

Taxon
Nicotiana benthamianaNicotiana benthamianae0
Treatment
supplementation with appropriate concentrations of the corresponding amino acids (CAAs)e0
Interactor
auxotrophic strainse0other
Outcome
survival rate of these three auxotrophic strainse0
Direction
restorede0
Comparator
wild-type EHA105e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana benthamiana
Nicotiana benthamiana · TaxonCharles Andres · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The transient expression efficiency and survival rate of these three auxotrophic strains in Nicotiana benthamiana were significantly impaired but could be restored to wild-type EHA105 levels by supplementation with appropriate concentrations of the corresponding amino acids (CAAs).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–681 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With amino acid supplementation, transformation using auxotrophic strains significantly reduced Agrobacterium overgrowth.

Taxon
N. benthamianaNicotiana benthamianae0
Treatment
these three auxotrophic strainse0
Interactor
AgrobacteriumAgrobacteriume0other
Outcome
Agrobacterium overgrowthe0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
wild-type EHA105e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana benthamiana
Nicotiana benthamiana · TaxonCharles Andres · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium
Agrobacterium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDidierFy · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of these three auxotrophic strains for the genetic transformation of N. benthamiana resulted in a significant reduction in Agrobacterium overgrowth and achieved transformation efficiency comparable to wild-type EHA105, when appropriate exogenous concentrations of the CAAs were supplied during the co-cultivation stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–1009 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With amino acid supplementation, transformation efficiency matched wild-type EHA105.

Taxon
N. benthamianaNicotiana benthamianae0
Treatment
these three auxotrophic strainse0
Outcome
transformation efficiencye0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
wild-type EHA105e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana benthamiana
Nicotiana benthamiana · TaxonCharles Andres · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of these three auxotrophic strains for the genetic transformation of N. benthamiana resulted in a significant reduction in Agrobacterium overgrowth and achieved transformation efficiency comparable to wild-type EHA105, when appropriate exogenous concentrations of the CAAs were supplied during the co-cultivation stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–1009 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxotrophic strain cell survival on plants and soil was much lower than wild-type EHA105.

Treatment
these three auxotrophic strainse0
Outcome
incidence of surviving cellse0
Direction
much lowere0
Comparator
wild-type EHA105e0
Setting
various plants and soile0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“through incubation experiments on various plants and soil, it was confirmed that the incidence of surviving cells from these three auxotrophic strains was much lower than that observed for the wild-type EHA105.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1233 · show in text ↑