Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Response of summer mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) to interactive effect of various sulphur levels and soil fertility treatments

Parul .; Harmit Singh Thind

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Summer mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) is an important legume crop with significant potential to improve soil health and nutritional outcomes. Mung bean production is lower due to factors such as shattering losses, pest and disease damage, irregular supply of nutrient fertilizers and limited resource availability. Sulphur is a critical nutrient for protein synthesis and nitrogen fixation which is often overlooked despite its importance. Although several studies have examined the effects of individual sulphur and soil fertility treatments on summer mung bean, there is a notable gap in understanding the interactive effects of varying S levels with different soil fertility treatments. Addressing this gap is crucial for developing efficient nutrient management strategies and sustainable production tailored to summer mung bean cultivation. The present investigation on the interactive effects of sulphur and soil fertility treatments is essential for optimizing nutrient management and enhancing crop productivity. The field experiment was carried out in split plot design with three sulphur levels (0, 30, 60 kg ha-1) in main plot and five soil fertility treatments in sub plot (control, consortium biofertilizer, FYM, RDF and combined application of consortium biofertilizer+ FYM+RDF) with three replications at Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab. The results revealed that there was significant increase in growth, yield attributes and yield at 60 kg S ha-1 followed by 30 kg S ha-1 and the application of FCB+FYM+RDF produced highest growth, yield attributes and yield followed by FRDF, FFYM and FCB whereas the interaction effect was significant in plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of nodules plant-1, number of seeds pod-1, stover yield and harvest index.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 60 kg S ha-1 significantly increased growth, yield attributes and yield of summer mung bean, followed by 30 kg S ha-1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
60 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
growth, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
followed by 30 kg S ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was significant increase in growth, yield attributes and yield at 60 kg S ha-1 followed by 30 kg S ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined FCB+FYM+RDF gave the highest growth, yield attributes and yield, followed by FRDF, FFYM and FCB.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
FCB+FYM+RDFe0
Outcome
growth, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
followed by FRDF, FFYM and FCBe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of FCB+FYM+RDF produced highest growth, yield attributes and yield followed by FRDF, FFYM and FCB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1621 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The sulphur by soil fertility interaction was significant for plant height, number of leaves per plant and number of nodules per plant.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
interaction effecte0
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of nodules plant-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction effect was significant in plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of nodules plant-1, number of seeds pod-1, stover yield and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1792 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The sulphur by soil fertility interaction was significant for number of seeds per pod, stover yield and harvest index.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
interaction effecte0
Outcome
number of seeds pod-1, stover yield and harvest indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction effect was significant in plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of nodules plant-1, number of seeds pod-1, stover yield and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1792 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.