Paper · 2025 · Egyptian Journal of Botany

Endophytic Yeasts as Biocontrol Agents for Common Bean White Rot Disease Caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum

Fatma Salem; Sherif Mohamed Zaki; Ahlam Mahmoud Gowily

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Common bean white-rot disease, caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is widespread and destructive, leading to economic losses. Endophytic yeasts have shown effectiveness in controlling fungal phytopathogens due to their diverse biological activities and broad-spectrum antifungal properties, making them promising candidates for application. From 11 endophytic yeasts isolated from 75 Phaseolus vulgaris plant samples, two superior yeast isolates, Cryptococcus albidus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were selected for both in-vitro and in-vivo trials. During the in-vitro phase, three biocontrol methods were employed: dual culture technique and volatile and non-volatile assays. Among these methods, C. albidus demonstrated the greatest ability to suppress S. sclerotiorum growth in the dual culture setup, achieving an inhibition rate of 48.57%. For volatile metabolites assay, both C. albidus and S. cerevisiae effectively inhibited the pathogen's growth, with rates of 53.38% and 44.24%, respectively. For the non-volatile metabolites assay, two isolates again showed the highest suppressive effects on S. sclerotiorum, with inhibition rates of 60.93% and 54.49%, respectively. Growth-chamber trials demonstrated yeast’s effectiveness in controlling pathogens on host plants. C. albidus reduced disease incidence by 43.7%, while S. cerevisiae reduced it by 31.2%. Additionally, trials showed enhanced plant growth parameters, as indicated by increases in height, and dry and fresh weight. These findings suggest that P. vulgaris plants may develop resistance against S. sclerotiorum through biological protection provided by endophytic yeasts, which could serve as novel and effective biocontrol agents.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the in-vitro dual culture, C. albidus showed the greatest ability to suppress S. sclerotiorum growth, with a 48.57% inhibition rate.

Treatment
dual culturee0
Interactor
S. sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Second interactor
C. albiduse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibition ratee0
Direction
suppresse0
Value
48.57%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“C. albidus demonstrated the greatest ability to suppress S. sclerotiorum growth in the dual culture setup, achieving an inhibition rate of 48.57%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatile metabolites of C. albidus inhibited the growth of S. sclerotiorum by 53.38%.

Treatment
volatile metabolites assaye0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
C. albiduse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pathogen's growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
53.38%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“For volatile metabolites assay, both C. albidus and S. cerevisiae effectively inhibited the pathogen's growth, with rates of 53.38% and 44.24%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatile metabolites of S. cerevisiae inhibited the growth of S. sclerotiorum by 44.24%.

Treatment
volatile metabolites assaye0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
S. cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pathogen's growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
44.24%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae · Second interactorMasur · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“For volatile metabolites assay, both C. albidus and S. cerevisiae effectively inhibited the pathogen's growth, with rates of 53.38% and 44.24%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the non-volatile metabolites assay, the first of the two isolates reached an inhibition rate of 60.93% on S. sclerotiorum.

Treatment
non-volatile metabolites assaye0
Interactor
S. sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
inhibition ratese0
Direction
suppressive effectse0
Value
60.93%e0

Not reportedTaxonSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“For the non-volatile metabolites assay, two isolates again showed the highest suppressive effects on S. sclerotiorum, with inhibition rates of 60.93% and 54.49%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the non-volatile metabolites assay, the second of the two isolates reached an inhibition rate of 54.49% on S. sclerotiorum.

Treatment
non-volatile metabolites assaye0
Interactor
S. sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
inhibition ratese0
Direction
suppressive effectse0
Value
54.49%e0

Not reportedTaxonSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“For the non-volatile metabolites assay, two isolates again showed the highest suppressive effects on S. sclerotiorum, with inhibition rates of 60.93% and 54.49%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In growth-chamber trials, C. albidus reduced disease incidence on host plants by 43.7%.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
C. albiduse1
Second interactor
C. albiduse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
reducede1
Value
43.7%e1
Setting
Growth-chambere0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Growth-chamber trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1200 · show in text ↑
e1

“C. albidus reduced disease incidence by 43.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In growth-chamber trials, S. cerevisiae reduced disease incidence on host plants by 31.2%.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
S. cerevisiaee1
Second interactor
S. cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee2
Direction
reducede1
Value
31.2%e1
Setting
Growth-chambere0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae · Second interactorMasur · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Growth-chamber trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1200 · show in text ↑
e1

“S. cerevisiae reduced it by 31.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1363 · show in text ↑
e2

“disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trials showed enhanced plant growth parameters, with increases in height and in dry and fresh weight.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
height, and dry and fresh weighte0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“trials showed enhanced plant growth parameters, as indicated by increases in height, and dry and fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1488 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that P. vulgaris plants may develop resistance against S. sclerotiorum through biological protection provided by endophytic yeasts.

Taxon
P. vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Interactor
S. sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Second interactor
endophytic yeastse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
resistance against S. sclerotiorume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“P. vulgaris plants may develop resistance against S. sclerotiorum through biological protection provided by endophytic yeasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1643 · show in text ↑

metabolite · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.