Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Study on genetic diversity in mungbean

SS Korke; DK Patil; Sujata Bhavusaheb Pawar

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted on 50 genotypes of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) obtained from the Agricultural Research Station, Badnapur. The study aimed to assess the genetic diversity among these genotypes. The genotypes were evaluated in a Randomized Block Design (RBD) with two replications during the Kharif season of 2020-21 at the same research station. Observations were recorded for ten quantitative characters: days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, plant height, number of primary branches per plant, number of secondary branches per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, 100-seed weight, seed yield per plant, and harvest index. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the treatment differences were statistically significant for most of the characters studied, indicating the presence of substantial genetic variability. The magnitude of the genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation further confirmed the existence of considerable diversity among the genotypes.Based on Mahalanobis D² statistics, the 50 genotypes were grouped into 17 distinct clusters using Tocher’s method. Cluster I was the largest, comprising 18 genotypes, followed by Cluster IV with 11 genotypes and Cluster II with 7 genotypes. The remaining clusters—III, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, XVI, and XVII—each contained a single genotype, indicating a high degree of diversity among them. The maximum intra-cluster distance was recorded for Cluster IV, followed by Cluster II and Cluster I, suggesting that the genotypes within these clusters possess considerable genetic variation. The maximum inter-cluster distance was observed between Cluster XVII and Cluster XVI, indicating that the genotypes grouped in these clusters were genetically the most divergent. Such diverse genotypes can be utilized in hybridization programs to exploit heterosis and develop superior recombinants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most quantitative characters differed significantly among genotypes.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
treatment differencese0
Qualifier
most of the characters studiede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the treatment differences were statistically significant for most of the characters studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic and phenotypic variation coefficients indicated considerable diversity.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
considerable diversity among the genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The magnitude of the genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation further confirmed the existence of considerable diversity among the genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 genotypes formed 17 clusters.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
distinct clusterse0
Value
17 distinct clusterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 50 genotypes were grouped into 17 distinct clusters using Tocher’s method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster I contained 18 genotypes, the most of any cluster.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
Cluster I was the largeste0
Value
18 genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cluster I was the largest, comprising 18 genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster IV contained 11 genotypes.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
Cluster IVe0
Value
11 genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Cluster IV with 11 genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster II contained 7 genotypes.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
Cluster IIe0
Value
7 genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cluster II with 7 genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each remaining cluster contained one genotype.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
each contained a single genotypee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The remaining clusters—III, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, XVI, and XVII—each contained a single genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster IV had the maximum intra-cluster distance.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
intra-cluster distancee0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum intra-cluster distance was recorded for Cluster IV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster II followed Cluster IV for intra-cluster distance.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
Cluster II and Cluster Ie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Cluster II and Cluster I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1547 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum inter-cluster distance was between Cluster XVII and Cluster XVI.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
inter-cluster distancee0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum inter-cluster distance was observed between Cluster XVII and Cluster XVI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose using diverse genotypes for hybridization to exploit heterosis and develop recombinants.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
utilized in hybridization programs to exploit heterosis and develop superior recombinantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Such diverse genotypes can be utilized in hybridization programs to exploit heterosis and develop superior recombinants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1940 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑