Paper · 2024 · 2024 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication, Power and Embedded System (SCOPES)

A Machine Learning-Based Framework for Drought Prediction and Resilience in Wheat Cultivation

Shaik Mahammed Haneef; D. Lita Pansy; Shaik Mabasha; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The study develops a machine learning-based framework of drought prediction and resilience for wheat cultivation that bypasses some weaknesses in traditional models reliant on outdated climate data and static statistical techniques. Currently used systems cannot adapt to changing environmental conditions and therefore lead to incorrect resource management. While the latter proposed framework, deep learning algorithms, configurations of LSTM and Random Forest, provides real-time predictions and more localized insights using comprehensive datasets. The results show an increase in accuracy (89%) over the existing systems (72 % and 78%), along with improved precision (85%) and recall (90%). Also, prediction errors for all risk categories were significantly smaller, demonstrating the validity of the framework. The user feedback reported high satisfaction with respect to usability and on-time alerts, further asserting the advantage of the model in promoting sustainability while ensuring that the farmers take informed decisions against climate variability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The framework reached 89% accuracy versus 72% and 78% for existing systems.

Outcome
accuracye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
89%e0
Qualifier
72 % and 78%e0
Comparator
existing systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in accuracy (89%) over the existing systems (72 % and 78%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Framework precision was 85%.

Outcome
precisione0
Direction
improvede0
Value
85%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved precision (85%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Framework recall was 90%.

Outcome
recalle0
Value
90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recall (90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prediction errors were significantly smaller for all risk categories.

Outcome
prediction errorse0
Direction
smallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prediction errors for all risk categories were significantly smaller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

User feedback reported high satisfaction with usability and timely alerts.

Outcome
high satisfaction with respect to usability and on-time alertse0
Value
high satisfactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The user feedback reported high satisfaction with respect to usability and on-time alerts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑