Paper · 2025 · Revista Árvore

Anatomical and physical analysis of the bark of three Amazonian tree species as a tool for species identification

Leif Armando Portal-Cahuana; Nestor Mamani-Mendoza

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Accurate species identification is crucial for conservation efforts and combating illegal logging. This study analyzes the anatomical characteristics and physical properties of the bark of three tropical species: Bertholletia excelsa, Cedrela odorata, and Eschweilera coriacea, to assess their potential for rapid species identification. The hypothesis proposed was that anatomical and physical differences in the bark would allow for effective identification. The study was conducted in the southeastern region of Peru, in the department of Madre de Dios, where nine trees from the three species were randomly selected. Bark samples were collected at breast height (DBH) from the trees. The samples were analyzed macroscopically, microscopically, and for physical properties such as moisture content, basic density, and volumetric shrinkage. The results showed that B. excelsa had the thickest (14.11 cm) and most fibrous bark, while C. odorata had thinner bark (9.33 cm), with a more regular organization. E. coriacea had the thinnest (8.83 cm) and most flexible bark. Regarding physical properties, B. excelsa exhibited the highest moisture content (68.71%), while C. odorata showed the highest basic density (740 kg/m³). This study demonstrates that anatomical and physical characteristics of bark are effective tools for the identification of tree species, contributing to conservation and the prevention of illegal logging.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. excelsa had the thickest and most fibrous bark at 14.11 cm.

Taxon
B. excelsaBertholletia excelsae0
Organ / stage
barke0
Outcome
thickest (14.11 cm) and most fibrous barke0
Direction
thickeste0
Value
14.11 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bertholletia excelsa
Bertholletia excelsa · TaxonTaken by Deathworm at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. excelsa had the thickest (14.11 cm) and most fibrous bark”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–927 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bertholletia excelsa, Cedrela odorata, and Eschweilera coriacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–276 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. odorata had thinner, more regularly organized bark at 9.33 cm.

Taxon
C. odorataCedrela odoratae0
Organ / stage
barke0
Outcome
thinner barke0
Direction
thinnere0
Value
9.33 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. odorata had thinner bark (9.33 cm), with a more regular organization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1007 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. coriacea had the thinnest and most flexible bark at 8.83 cm.

Taxon
E. coriaceaEschweilera coriaceae0
Organ / stage
barke0
Outcome
thinnest (8.83 cm) and most flexible barke0
Direction
thinneste0
Value
8.83 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“E. coriacea had the thinnest (8.83 cm) and most flexible bark.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1070 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. excelsa had the highest bark moisture content at 68.71%.

Taxon
B. excelsaBertholletia excelsae0
Outcome
moisture contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
68.71%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bertholletia excelsa
Bertholletia excelsa · TaxonTaken by Deathworm at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. excelsa exhibited the highest moisture content (68.71%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. odorata had the highest basic density at 740 kg/m³.

Taxon
C. odorataCedrela odoratae0
Outcome
basic densitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
740 kg/m³e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. odorata showed the highest basic density (740 kg/m³).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1224 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bark anatomy and physical traits were effective for identifying tree species.

Taxon
Bertholletia excelsaBertholletia excelsae1
Outcome
identification of tree speciese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bertholletia excelsa
Bertholletia excelsa · TaxonTaken by Deathworm at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anatomical and physical characteristics of bark are effective tools for the identification of tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1360 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bertholletia excelsa, Cedrela odorata, and Eschweilera coriacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–276 · show in text ↑