Paper · 2004 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Host Plant Resistance to Leafminers in Lettuce

Beiquan Mou; Yong-Biao Liu

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Leafminer ( Liriomyza spp.) is a major insect pest of many important agricultural crops including lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.). The goals of this study were to evaluate lettuce genotypes for resistance to leafminers and to estimate the heritabilities of leafminer-resistant traits in the field, to examine the association among different resistant traits, and to study the mechanism of leafminer resistance in lettuce. Seventy-eight lettuce accessions and 232 F 2 plants of crosses were evaluated for leafminer stings and the production of pupae and flies in the field in 2001 and 2002, and resistant genotypes were subjected to no-choice test. Wild species ( Lactuca serriola L., L. saligna L., and L. virosa L.) had significantly fewer stings than cultivated lettuces. Among cultivated lettuces, sting densities were lowest on leaf lettuce and highest on romaine types. The sting results from the field were highly correlated with the results from insect cages ( r = 0.770 and 0.756 for 2001 and 2002 tests, respectively), suggesting that a cage test can be used to screen for resistance in the field. Broad-sense heritability estimates for stings per unit leaf area in the field were 81.6% and 67.4% for 2001 and 2002 tests, respectively. The number of pupae produced per plant or per leaf was moderately correlated with sting density but was not correlated with leaf weight. Results suggest that both antixenosis and antibiosis exist in lettuce germplasm and resistant genotypes from choice tests remain resistant under no-choice conditions. These findings suggest that genetic improvement of cultivated lettuce for leafminer resistance is feasible.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild Lactuca species had fewer leafminer stings than cultivated lettuce.

Taxon
Lactuca serriola L., L. saligna L., and L. virosa L.Lactuca serriolaLactuca virosaLactuca salignae0
Outcome
stingse0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
cultivated lettucese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca serriola
Lactuca serriola · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca virosa
Lactuca virosa · TaxonAndreas Rockstein · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lactuca saligna
Lactuca saligna · TaxonPhilmarin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wild species ( Lactuca serriola L., L. saligna L., and L. virosa L.) had significantly fewer stings than cultivated lettuces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–769 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among cultivated lettuce, leaf types had the lowest sting density and romaine the highest.

Taxon
cultivated lettucesLactuca sativae0
Material
leaf lettucee0
Outcome
sting densitiese0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
romaine typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among cultivated lettuces, sting densities were lowest on leaf lettuce and highest on romaine types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–870 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field sting results correlated with cage results in 2001 and 2002.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
sting results from the fielde0
Direction
highly correlatede0
Value
r = 0.770 and 0.756e0
Setting
insect cagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sting results from the field were highly correlated with the results from insect cages ( r = 0.770 and 0.756 for 2001 and 2002 tests, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field sting density broad-sense heritability was 81.6% in 2001 and 67.4% in 2002.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
Broad-sense heritability estimates for stings per unit leaf areae0
Value
81.6% and 67.4%e0
Setting
in the fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broad-sense heritability estimates for stings per unit leaf area in the field were 81.6% and 67.4% for 2001 and 2002 tests, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pupae per plant or leaf correlated moderately with sting density.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
number of pupae produced per plant or per leafe0
Direction
moderately correlatede0
Comparator
sting densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of pupae produced per plant or per leaf was moderately correlated with sting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pupae production did not correlate with leaf weight.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
number of pupae produced per plant or per leafe1
Direction
not correlatede0
Comparator
leaf weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was not correlated with leaf weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1377 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of pupae produced per plant or per leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce germplasm showed antixenosis and antibiosis to leafminers.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
lettuce germplasme0
Outcome
antixenosis and antibiosise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both antixenosis and antibiosis exist in lettuce germplasm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1458 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant lettuce genotypes from choice tests remained resistant without choice.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Material
resistant genotypese0
Outcome
resistante0
Setting
no-choice conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resistant genotypes from choice tests remain resistant under no-choice conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1544 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest genetic improvement of lettuce for leafminer resistance is feasible.

Taxon
cultivated lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
genetic improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetic improvement of cultivated lettuce for leafminer resistance is feasible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1652 · show in text ↑