Paper · 2025 · Planta Animalia

Influence of Water pH on Insecticide Efficacy against Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) under Field Conditions

Sanaullah Mangi; Fahad Nazir Khoso; Arfan Ahmed Gilal; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is one of the key pests of cotton in the world. Farmers often use insecticides to control this pest, but various factors impact their effectiveness, with water quality being one of the most important yet frequently neglected. Using impure water as a solvent can significantly decrease insecticide performance due to unfavourable pH levels. To address this critical issue and the significant research gap, this study was conducted to evaluate the impact of water pH on the performance of synthetic and bio-insecticides. A field experiment was conducted using cotton variety Sindh-1. Various synthetics (Novaluron, Chlorantraniliprole, Emamectin benzoate, and Gamma-Cyhalothrin) and botanical insecticides (Azadirachta indica, Eucalyptus globulus, Calotropis procera, and Datura stramoniums) were screened for their effectiveness against P. gossypiella. Both synthetic and botanicals insecticides were dissolved with various water pH levels (4-10). All insecticides were applied at their recommended dose and data was recorded before spray, whereas subsequent observations were taken after 24, 48, 72, 96, and 168 hours of the spray. There were a total of two sprays that were done at 15 days interval. Five plants were randomly selected to record infestation of P. gossypiella from flowers, buds, twigs, and bolls. ANOVA with LSD and Correlation co-efficient were analyzed through statistical software Statistix 8.1. The results further revealed that all applied synthetic insecticides were more effective than the botanical treatments. However, among the applied botanicals, Azadirachta indica (2.00±0.19 and 1.95±0.13 larvae/plant) gave the maximum reduction in the P. gossypiella population, followed by E. globulus powder (2.20±0.17 and 2.00±0.11 larvae/plant), observed 24 hours after the first and second sprays with pH5 water, followed by pH6 water treatment, respectively, while D. stramonium and C. procera were the least effective among the botanicals. The highest corrected infestation reduction in P. gossypiella was recorded with Novaluron (83.33±0.14% and 83.12±0.14% in the first and second sprays, respectively) at 96 hours when applied with pH 7 water. In contrast, Chlorantraniliprole showed maximum reduction (71.88±0.14% and 73.40±0.14%) at 96 hours when applied with pH 6 water. However, among the applied botanicals the A. indica gave maximum reduction in P. gossypiella infestation (58.33±0.12 and 56.38±0.12 %) after first and second spray at 96 hours of application, respectively. Keeping in view the above findings, it is suggested that the application of Novaluron or Chlorantraniliprole, mixed with pH 7 and pH 6 water can be done to reduce the infestation of P. gossypiella, whereas Azadirachta indica can also be a good substitute of the synthetic insecticide for P. gossypiella to lower environmental pollution and resistance development in the pest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All synthetic insecticides were more effective than the botanical treatments against P. gossypiella.

Treatment
synthetic insecticidese1
Interactor
P. gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae2pest
Outcome
more effectivee1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
botanical treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted using cotton variety Sindh-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results further revealed that all applied synthetic insecticides were more effective than the botanical treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1616 · show in text ↑
e2

“among the applied botanicals, Azadirachta indica (2.00±0.19 and 1.95±0.13 larvae/plant) gave the maximum reduction in the P. gossypiella population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachta indica gave the maximum reduction in the P. gossypiella population, at 2.00±0.19 and 1.95±0.13 larvae/plant, after the first and second sprays with pH 5 water.

Treatment
Azadirachta indicae2
Interactor
P. gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae2pest
Outcome
P. gossypiella populatione2
Direction
maximum reductione2
Value
2.00±0.19 and 1.95±0.13 larvae/plante2
Qualifier
observed 24 hours after the first and second sprays with pH5 watere3
Comparator
applied botanicalse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“among the applied botanicals, Azadirachta indica (2.00±0.19 and 1.95±0.13 larvae/plant) gave the maximum reduction in the P. gossypiella population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1774 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted using cotton variety Sindh-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–662 · show in text ↑
e3

“observed 24 hours after the first and second sprays with pH5 water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus globulus powder followed Azadirachta indica in reducing the P. gossypiella population, at 2.20±0.17 and 2.00±0.11 larvae/plant.

Treatment
E. globulus powdere3
Interactor
P. gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae2pest
Outcome
P. gossypiella populatione2
Direction
followed bye3
Value
2.20±0.17 and 2.00±0.11 larvae/plante3
Comparator
Azadirachta indicae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“among the applied botanicals, Azadirachta indica (2.00±0.19 and 1.95±0.13 larvae/plant) gave the maximum reduction in the P. gossypiella population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1774 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted using cotton variety Sindh-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–662 · show in text ↑
e3

“followed by E. globulus powder (2.20±0.17 and 2.00±0.11 larvae/plant), observed 24 hours after the first and second sprays with pH5 water, followed by pH6 water treatment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–1960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. stramonium and C. procera were the least effective botanicals against P. gossypiella.

Treatment
D. stramonium and C. procerae4
Outcome
least effectivee4
Direction
least effectivee4
Comparator
among the botanicalse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted using cotton variety Sindh-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–662 · show in text ↑
e4

“while D. stramonium and C. procera were the least effective among the botanicals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1962–2042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Novaluron gave the highest corrected reduction in P. gossypiella infestation at 96 hours with pH 7 water.

Treatment
Novalurone5
Interactor
P. gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae5pest
Outcome
corrected infestation reductione5
Direction
higheste5
Value
83.33±0.14%e5
Qualifier
at 96 hours when applied with pH 7 watere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted using cotton variety Sindh-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–662 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest corrected infestation reduction in P. gossypiella was recorded with Novaluron (83.33±0.14% and 83.12±0.14% in the first and second sprays, respectively) at 96 hours when applied with pH 7 water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole gave the maximum reduction at 96 hours with pH 6 water.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprolee6
Outcome
reductione6
Direction
maximume6
Value
71.88±0.14%e6
Qualifier
at 96 hours when applied with pH 6 watere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted using cotton variety Sindh-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–662 · show in text ↑
e6

“In contrast, Chlorantraniliprole showed maximum reduction (71.88±0.14% and 73.40±0.14%) at 96 hours when applied with pH 6 water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2251–2379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachta indica gave the maximum reduction in P. gossypiella infestation, 58.33±0.12% at 96 hours.

Treatment
A. indicae7
Interactor
P. gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae7pest
Outcome
P. gossypiella infestatione7
Direction
maximum reductione7
Value
58.33±0.12e7
Qualifier
at 96 hours of applicatione7
Comparator
among the applied botanicalse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted using cotton variety Sindh-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–662 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, among the applied botanicals the A. indica gave maximum reduction in P. gossypiella infestation (58.33±0.12 and 56.38±0.12 %) after first and second spray at 96 hours of application, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2381–2585 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Applying Novaluron or Chlorantraniliprole in pH 7 or pH 6 water can be done to reduce P. gossypiella infestation on cotton.

Treatment
application of Novaluron or Chlorantraniliprole, mixed with pH 7 and pH 6 watere1
Interactor
P. gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Outcome
reduce the infestatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted using cotton variety Sindh-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“it is suggested that the application of Novaluron or Chlorantraniliprole, mixed with pH 7 and pH 6 water can be done to reduce the infestation of P. gossypiella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2623–2783 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachta indica can be a good substitute for synthetic insecticide against P. gossypiella on cotton.

Treatment
Azadirachta indicae1
Interactor
P. gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Outcome
a good substitute of the synthetic insecticidee1
Qualifier
to lower environmental pollution and resistance development in the peste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted using cotton variety Sindh-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“Azadirachta indica can also be a good substitute of the synthetic insecticide for P. gossypiella to lower environmental pollution and resistance development in the pest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2793–2961 · show in text ↑

novaluron · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azadirachta indica · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

insecticide · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.