Paper · 2025 · American Journal of Plant Biology

Genotypic Variation of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) for Agronomic Traits Under Low and High Soil Phosphorus Regimes

Gemechu Kumbi; Victor Adetimirin; Christian Fatokun; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) is a multi-purpose crop owing to its immense economic and ecological benefits. Genetic variability assessment for agronomic traits is a crucial step in improving the yield and yield components of the crop. Phosphorus deficiency seriously affects the yield of faba bean. The present study was conducted to evaluate the genotypic variability of faba bean for agronomic traits. Twenty and 12 genotypes, in the field and greenhouse respectively, were planted under two P fertilizer regimes (0 and 46kg/ha). Analysis of variance indicated highly significant (P<0.01) genotypic variation for most of the agronomic traits under both field and greenhouse; while grain yield (GY), days to fifty percent flowering (DFF), number of pods per plant (NPP) and days to 90% maturity (DNM) had significant genotype by location interaction. The agronomic performance of P-unfertilized (P-) treatments was significantly reduced; with the effect ranging from -4.6% for DNM to 20.3% for NPP in the field; and from -3.6% for DFF to 21.6% for shoot dry weight per plant (SDWP) in the greenhouse. Correlation analysis indicated that most traits were strongly correlated to one another; with consistently significant correlation among GY, DFF, and NPP. Biomass production per day (BPD), GY, SDWP, DNM, and NPP were the highest contributors to the genetic variation. Mean comparisons and biplot analysis results revealed that genotypes Moti, Gebelcho, Dosha, Tumsa, and Didea had superior agronomic performance under all conditions. The study revealed the availability of genotypic variation among the faba bean genotypes for agronomic traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes varied significantly for most agronomic traits in field and greenhouse conditions.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
genotypic variation for most of the agronomic traitse0
Setting
field and greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of variance indicated highly significant (P<0.01) genotypic variation for most of the agronomic traits under both field and greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield, flowering time, pods per plant and maturity had genotype by location interactions.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
grain yield (GY), days to fifty percent flowering (DFF), number of pods per plant (NPP) and days to 90% maturity (DNM)e0
Setting
locatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (GY), days to fifty percent flowering (DFF), number of pods per plant (NPP) and days to 90% maturity (DNM) had significant genotype by location interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Without phosphorus fertilizer, days to 90% maturity was reduced by 4.6% in the field.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
P-unfertilized (P-) treatmentse0
Outcome
DNMe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
-4.6%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The agronomic performance of P-unfertilized (P-) treatments was significantly reduced; with the effect ranging from -4.6% for DNM to 20.3% for NPP in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Without phosphorus fertilizer, pods per plant were reduced by 20.3% in the field.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
P-unfertilized (P-) treatmentse0
Outcome
NPPe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20.3%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The agronomic performance of P-unfertilized (P-) treatments was significantly reduced; with the effect ranging from -4.6% for DNM to 20.3% for NPP in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Without phosphorus fertilizer, days to flowering fell by 3.6% in the greenhouse.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
P-unfertilized (P-) treatmentse1
Outcome
DFFe0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
-3.6%e0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and from -3.6% for DFF to 21.6% for shoot dry weight per plant (SDWP) in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“P-unfertilized (P-) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Without phosphorus fertilizer, shoot dry weight per plant fell by 21.6% in the greenhouse.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
shoot dry weight per plant (SDWP)e0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
21.6%e0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and from -3.6% for DFF to 21.6% for shoot dry weight per plant (SDWP) in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield, flowering time and pods per plant were significantly correlated.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
correlation among GY, DFF, and NPPe0

Not reportedOrgan / stageDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with consistently significant correlation among GY, DFF, and NPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass production, grain yield, shoot dry weight, maturity and pods per plant contributed most to genetic variation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
highest contributors to the genetic variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass production per day (BPD), GY, SDWP, DNM, and NPP were the highest contributors to the genetic variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moti, Gebelcho, Dosha, Tumsa and Didea had superior agronomic performance across conditions.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Moti, Gebelcho, Dosha, Tumsa, and Dideae0
Outcome
agronomic performancee0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
under all conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes Moti, Gebelcho, Dosha, Tumsa, and Didea had superior agronomic performance under all conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑