Abstract
The timely plant disease detection is important for the sustainable environment and yield protection. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the hybrid method with the advanced deep learning (DL)methods for early detection of diseases in plants. Accurate and early diagnosis plays a crucial role in minimizing crop losses and enhancing agricultural productivity. By reducing the overuse of pesticides and enabling targeted interventions, these models contribute to more sustainable farming practices. The study highlights how intelligent disease detection can support environmental conservation by lowering chemical runoff and reducing resource waste. This study focuses on evaluating the performance of five advanced machine and DL models such as Vision Transformer (ViT), ResNet-50, EfficientNet-B5, and Xception alongside a proposed hybrid approach that combines ExtraTrees with K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) for plant disease classification. The objective is to assess each model’s classification accuracy, computational efficiency, and resource consumption for selecting the most appropriate model in agricultural applications. The proposed ExtraTrees + KNN hybrid approach shows the highest overall efficiency and delivering strong classification accuracy while maintaining minimal computational overhead. Vision Transformer (ViT) achieves competitive results in terms of accuracy but requires comparatively more resources. ResNet-50 and EfficientNet-B5 also perform well. Xception performs moderately in predictive performance. The hybrid model’s capability makes it suitable for deployment in resource-constrained agricultural environments where computational resources are not enough as required by other deep learning models. This research is also highlighting the importance of evaluating both predictive performance and resource efficiency for sustainable plant disease monitoring and management system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
The ExtraTrees and KNN hybrid had the highest overall efficiency with strong accuracy and minimal overhead.
Not reportedComparatorValue
Verbatim
e0“The proposed ExtraTrees + KNN hybrid approach shows the highest overall efficiency and delivering strong classification accuracy while maintaining minimal computational overhead”
t0“Plant Disease Detection Models”
Claim · model-written summary
Vision Transformer was competitive in accuracy but used more resources.
Not reportedValue
Verbatim
e0“Vision Transformer (ViT) achieves competitive results in terms of accuracy but requires comparatively more resources”
t0“Plant Disease Detection Models”
Claim · model-written summary
ResNet-50 and EfficientNet-B5 performed well.
Not reportedComparatorValue
Verbatim
e0“ResNet-50 and EfficientNet-B5 also perform well”
t0“Plant Disease Detection Models”
Claim · model-written summary
Xception had moderate predictive performance.
Not reportedComparatorValue
Verbatim
e0“Xception performs moderately in predictive performance”
t0“Plant Disease Detection Models”