Abstract
An experiment was conducted to screen hundred genotypes of sesame to identify the source of resistance to phyllody diseases. All the Hundred genotypes were raised during summer season 2023 at Agricultural Research Station, Darsi under unprotected field conditions, following infector row technique with YLM 66 as susceptible check. After 50 DAS, the genotypes were scored for phyllody based on 0-6 scale (Akhtar et al., 2013). Among all the genotypes screened twenty seven genotypes were expressed immune reaction to phyllody, 20 with moderately resistant and eighteen were moderately resistant, thirteen were tolerant, twelve were moderately susceptible and ten genotypes expressed susceptible reactions. Among all the genotypes, nine genotypes were expressed resistant reaction, fourteen with moderately resistant and seventy seven genotypes expressed susceptible reactions. None of the genotypes were found to be immune to powdery mildew. The identified resistant genotypes can be further utilized for development of resistant varieties and also aids in identification of marker through molecular breeding.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Twenty-seven genotypes showed an immune phyllody reaction.
Verbatim
e0“twenty seven genotypes were expressed immune reaction to phyllody”
Claim · model-written summary
The phyllody reaction listing reported 20 moderately resistant genotypes.
Verbatim
e0“20 with moderately resistant”
e1“twenty seven genotypes were expressed immune reaction to phyllody”
Claim · model-written summary
Thirteen genotypes were tolerant to phyllody.
Verbatim
e0“thirteen were tolerant”
e1“twenty seven genotypes were expressed immune reaction to phyllody”
Claim · model-written summary
Twelve genotypes were moderately susceptible to phyllody.
Verbatim
e0“twelve were moderately susceptible”
e1“twenty seven genotypes were expressed immune reaction to phyllody”
Claim · model-written summary
Ten genotypes were susceptible to phyllody.
Verbatim
e0“ten genotypes expressed susceptible reactions”
Claim · model-written summary
Nine genotypes showed a resistant reaction in the second disease listing.
Verbatim
e0“nine genotypes were expressed resistant reaction”
Claim · model-written summary
Fourteen genotypes showed a moderately resistant reaction in the second listing.
Verbatim
e0“fourteen with moderately resistant”
e1“twenty seven genotypes were expressed immune reaction to phyllody”
Claim · model-written summary
Seventy-seven genotypes showed susceptible reactions in the second listing.
Verbatim
e0“seventy seven genotypes expressed susceptible reactions”
Claim · model-written summary
No genotype was immune to powdery mildew.
Verbatim
e0“None of the genotypes were found to be immune to powdery mildew”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend resistant genotypes for breeding resistant varieties.
Verbatim
e0“identified resistant genotypes can be further utilized for development of resistant varieties”