Paper · 2025 · African Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Research

Effects of Shea Butter. (Vitellaria paradoxa) Bark Extracts as Root Dips on Root-knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne Spp) Infestation and Growth of Tomato (Lycepersicon Iycopersicum L.) in Adamawa, Nigeria

M. Y. Jada; O. A. Zirafilla; Maryam Y. M.; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The management of root-knot nematodes(Meloidogyne spp.) presents significant challenges, particularly when synthetic (artificial) chemicals are employed. These chemicals are expensive for Nigerian farmers who lack resources and pose health and environmental risks. As a result, an experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of plant extracts, which are readily soluble and may be less expensive, as a root dip. A field study was carried out using root dips for tomato seedlings to evaluate the effectiveness of shea butter bark extracts against Meloidogyne spp. infestation. The field experiments were set up in a split plot design at the Loko and Mayo Belwa locations. There were sixteen treatments that were replicated three times, with four different concentrations (control, 10, 30, and 60%) and four different exposure times (5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes). The main plot was given concentrations, and the subplots were given exposure times. Data on the number of branches, fresh and dry shoot weight (g), and plant height (cm) following transplanting (WAT) were collected from the two sites. Galling index and fresh and dry root weight (g). ANOVA was used to analyze the data, and at the five percent probability level, means were separated using the Least Significant Difference (LSD). The field experiment's establishment and growth results at the Loko and Mayo Belwa locations demonstrated that the root dip exposed to 60% concentration in shea butter bark extracts for 60 minutes produced significant results (P=0). At 4, the plant height is higher (05). At Loko, WAT is 45.92, 69.75, and 73.25 cm, while at Mayo Belwa, it is 40.00, 57.00, and 67.25 cm. Additionally, it demonstrated a highly significant (P=0.01) difference between concentration and duration at 4.8, a significant (P=0.05) interaction between location and concentration at all times (4,8, and 10 WAT), and a significant (P=0.05) interaction between location and duration at 4WAT. 10WAT in addition to a significant (P=0.05) location difference. duration and focus at 4WAT exclusively. One could draw the conclusion that V. Extracts from paradoxa promoted establishment and growth by preventing or discouraging Meloidogyne spp. from attacking the dipped roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dip in 60% shea butter bark extract for 60 minutes produced significant establishment and growth of tomato at Loko and Mayo Belwa compared with control.

Treatment
root dip exposed to 60% concentration in shea butter bark extracts for 60 minutese0
Outcome
establishment and growthe0
Comparator
controle1
Setting
Loko and Mayo Belwa locationse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Lycepersicon Iycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–177 · show in text ↑
e0

“The field experiment's establishment and growth results at the Loko and Mayo Belwa locations demonstrated that the root dip exposed to 60% concentration in shea butter bark extracts for 60 minutes produced significant results (P=0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1532 · show in text ↑
e1

“four different concentrations (control, 10, 30, and 60%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–807 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plant height at Loko was 45.92, 69.75 and 73.25 cm at successive assessments.

Outcome
plant heighte2
Value
45.92, 69.75, and 73.25 cme3
Setting
Lokoe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Lycepersicon Iycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–177 · show in text ↑
e2

“At 4, the plant height is higher (05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1571 · show in text ↑
e3

“At Loko, WAT is 45.92, 69.75, and 73.25 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1615 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plant height at Mayo Belwa was 40.00, 57.00 and 67.25 cm at successive assessments.

Outcome
plant heighte2
Value
40.00, 57.00, and 67.25 cme4
Setting
Mayo Belwae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Lycepersicon Iycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–177 · show in text ↑
e2

“At 4, the plant height is higher (05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1571 · show in text ↑
e4

“while at Mayo Belwa, it is 40.00, 57.00, and 67.25 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1670 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentration and duration of the root dip differed highly significantly (P=0.01) at 4.8.

Outcome
difference between concentration and duratione5
Value
P=0.01e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Lycepersicon Iycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–177 · show in text ↑
e5

“it demonstrated a highly significant (P=0.01) difference between concentration and duration at 4.8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1784 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between location and concentration was significant (P=0.05) at all times (4, 8 and 10 WAT).

Outcome
interaction between location and concentratione6
Value
P=0.05e6
Qualifier
at all times (4,8, and 10 WAT)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Lycepersicon Iycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–177 · show in text ↑
e6

“a significant (P=0.05) interaction between location and concentration at all times (4,8, and 10 WAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between location and duration was significant (P=0.05) at 4 WAT.

Outcome
interaction between location and duratione7
Value
P=0.05e7
Qualifier
at 4WATe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Lycepersicon Iycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–177 · show in text ↑
e7

“a significant (P=0.05) interaction between location and duration at 4WAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–1964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The location difference was significant (P=0.05) at 10 WAT.

Outcome
location differencee1
Value
P=0.05e1
Qualifier
10WATe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Lycepersicon Iycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“10WAT in addition to a significant (P=0.05) location difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1966–2029 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shea butter bark extracts promoted tomato establishment and growth by preventing or discouraging Meloidogyne spp. from attacking the dipped roots.

Treatment
Extracts from paradoxae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne sppMeloidogynee1pest
Outcome
establishment and growthe1
Qualifier
preventing or discouraging Meloidogyne spp. from attacking the dipped rootse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Lycepersicon Iycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“One could draw the conclusion that V. Extracts from paradoxa promoted establishment and growth by preventing or discouraging Meloidogyne spp. from attacking the dipped roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2244 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.