Paper · 2025 · Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems

EFFECT OF COMPLEMENTARY APPLICATION OF BIOPRODUCTS ON THE PRODUCTIVITY AND SEED QUALITY OF COWPEA (Vigna unguiculata cv. INIFAT-93)

Yoerlandy Santana-Baños; Michel Ruiz Sánchez; Sergio Carrodeguas Díaz; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Bioproducts represent a promising alternative for sustainable agriculture, notable for their ability to stimulate plant growth and development, which positions them as valuable tools in current production systems. Objective: To evaluate the effect of complementary application of EcoMic®, QuitoMax® and CBFERT bioproducts on the productivity and seed quality of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata cv. INIFAT-93). Methodology: The research was conducted in experimental plots at the University of Pinar del Río (Cuba), using a randomized complete block design with four replications. Four treatments were evaluated: 1) 100% chemical fertilization (control); 2) 50% chemical fertilization plus EcoMic®; 3) 50% chemical fertilization plus QuitoMax® + CBFERT; and 4) 50% chemical fertilization plus the combination of all three bioproducts. Atharvest, biological productivity variables, agricultural yield components, and seed quality parameters (biomass and dimensions) were measured. Results: Analyses revealed that bioproduct treatments showed significant results: they enabled a 50% reduction in chemical fertilizer use, increased dry biomass production by 24%, and achieved agricultural yields exceeding 1.2 t ha-1. Regarding seed quality, biomass increased by 20-32% while maintaining dimensional variations below 6% compared to the control treatment. Implications: It is feasible to substantially reduce chemical fertilizer use in cowpea cultivation through complementary application of bioproducts, while maintaining or even improving crop production and quality parameters. Conclusions: Application of 50% chemical fertilization in combination with either EcoMic® or QuitoMax® + CBFERT significantly increased the biological and agricultural productivity of cowpea, ensuring seed quality comparable to that obtained with complete chemical fertilization. These results demonstrate the remarkable potential of these bioproducts for implementing more sustainable and efficient agricultural production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioproduct treatments enabled a 50% reduction in chemical fertilizer use in cowpea.

Material
INIFAT-93e0
Treatment
bioproduct treatmentse1
Outcome
chemical fertilizer usee1
Direction
reductione1
Value
50%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity and seed quality of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata cv. INIFAT-93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–414 · show in text ↑
e1

“Analyses revealed that bioproduct treatments showed significant results: they enabled a 50% reduction in chemical fertilizer use, increased dry biomass production by 24%, and achieved agricultural yields exceeding 1.2 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioproduct treatments increased dry biomass production in cowpea by 24%.

Treatment
bioproduct treatmentse1
Outcome
dry biomass productione1
Direction
increasede1
Value
24%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity and seed quality of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata cv. INIFAT-93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–414 · show in text ↑
e1

“Analyses revealed that bioproduct treatments showed significant results: they enabled a 50% reduction in chemical fertilizer use, increased dry biomass production by 24%, and achieved agricultural yields exceeding 1.2 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioproduct treatments gave cowpea agricultural yields exceeding 1.2 t ha-1.

Treatment
bioproduct treatmentse1
Outcome
agricultural yieldse1
Direction
exceedinge1
Value
1.2 t ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity and seed quality of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata cv. INIFAT-93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–414 · show in text ↑
e1

“Analyses revealed that bioproduct treatments showed significant results: they enabled a 50% reduction in chemical fertilizer use, increased dry biomass production by 24%, and achieved agricultural yields exceeding 1.2 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioproduct treatments increased seed biomass in cowpea by 20-32% compared with the control.

Organ / stage
seede2
Treatment
bioproduct treatmentse1
Outcome
biomasse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
20-32%e2
Comparator
control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity and seed quality of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata cv. INIFAT-93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–414 · show in text ↑
e1

“bioproduct treatments showed significant results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1065 · show in text ↑
e2

“Regarding seed quality, biomass increased by 20-32% while maintaining dimensional variations below 6% compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioproduct treatments kept seed dimensional variation below 6% relative to the control, with no marked change.

Organ / stage
seede2
Treatment
bioproduct treatmentse1
Outcome
dimensional variationse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Value
below 6%e2
Comparator
control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity and seed quality of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata cv. INIFAT-93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–414 · show in text ↑
e1

“bioproduct treatments showed significant results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1065 · show in text ↑
e2

“Regarding seed quality, biomass increased by 20-32% while maintaining dimensional variations below 6% compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 50% chemical fertilization significantly increased cowpea biological and agricultural productivity.

Treatment
50% chemical fertilizatione3
Outcome
biological and agricultural productivitye5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity and seed quality of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata cv. INIFAT-93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–414 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of 50% chemical fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1636 · show in text ↑
e5

“significantly increased the biological and agricultural productivity of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea seed quality under 50% chemical fertilization with bioproducts was comparable to complete chemical fertilization.

Treatment
50% chemical fertilizatione3
Outcome
seed qualitye6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Comparator
complete chemical fertilizatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity and seed quality of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata cv. INIFAT-93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–414 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of 50% chemical fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1636 · show in text ↑
e6

“ensuring seed quality comparable to that obtained with complete chemical fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1860 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.